Jump to content

Golden Domers and more: CFB 2024/25 thread.


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

I mean, when your best player on offense and defense opt out, and your best DB quits at halftime, it doesn't really help. But, it is what it is, and unfortunately, that is modern day college football. It sucks honestly, but nothing we can do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Capn12 said:

I mean, when your best player on offense and defense opt out, and your best DB quits at halftime, it doesn't really help. But, it is what it is, and unfortunately, that is modern day college football. It sucks honestly, but nothing we can do.

Illinois had their best player on each side of the ball out too. 

Beamer is a tool though. Can't believe that tantrum

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Buehrle>Wood said:

Illinois had their best player on each side of the ball out too. 

Beamer is a tool though. Can't believe that tantrum

 

I'm no Beamer apologist, but if you think that wasn't warranted after lardass was mocking his substitution strategy of draining the clock, I'm not sure what else to say...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the problem with college football regarding the playoffs/championship is that there’s always like 2-5 teams that you know actually have a legitimate chance to win it all, and then a tier just below them of teams you can really only argue deserve a chance to try and fail to beat the clearly superior teams. So they keep expanding the playoffs in an effort to make it more fair for those lesser teams, but it’s still really just a race between those top couple teams.

I don’t know the answer to the problem. I just know a single championship game isn’t enough, and anything more than 8 teams in the playoffs is overkill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Milkman delivers said:

I think the problem with college football regarding the playoffs/championship is that there’s always like 2-5 teams that you know actually have a legitimate chance to win it all, and then a tier just below them of teams you can really only argue deserve a chance to try and fail to beat the clearly superior teams. So they keep expanding the playoffs in an effort to make it more fair for those lesser teams, but it’s still really just a race between those top couple teams.

I don’t know the answer to the problem. I just know a single championship game isn’t enough, and anything more than 8 teams in the playoffs is overkill.

That ASU fan shaking his head just now pretty much encapsulates the entire bowl season so far.

Then you have Oregon Ohio State rematch in the quarter finals...maybe the two best overall teams in terms of talent, and meanwhile PSU gets Boise?

Just have the Big Ten top two vs. SEC top two lol.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Sugar Bowl will not be played Wednesday following a deadly pickup truck attack in New Orleans that killed at least 15 people and injured dozens.

Sugar Bowl CEO Jeff Hundley said in a news conference that the College Football Playoff quarterfinal between Georgia and Notre Dame would be delayed by 24 hours and that other information would be released as possible.

The decision to postpone the game came after the Caesars Superdome in New Orleans underwent a security sweep after two improvised explosive devices were found at the scene of the attack in the French Quarter district.

espn.com

 

Crazy/gutsy call there with the fake punt by ASU with 4th/9 on their own 21.  Points here at least makes it a game again...especially a TD.

But Boise State and ASU kicking games let them down.

Edited by caulfield12
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arizona dominated in every category except final score. 

If the rest of the quarterfinals are this good the NCAA will be very happy and at least a couple of fans might come around to the expanded playoffs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Texsox said:

Arizona dominated in every category except final score. 

If the rest of the quarterfinals are this good the NCAA will be very happy and at least a couple of fans might come around to the expanded playoffs. 

You spoke too soon...barring a miraculous Oregon Ducks comeback.

390 to 69 in total yards and still not to halftime yet.

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, caulfield12 said:

You spoke too soon...barring a miraculous Oregon Ducks comeback.

390 to 69 in total yards and still not to halftime yet.

Great to see Big 10* teams playing well. 

*historic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The messiest final would be Georgia - Texas Part 3 if Texas would win.  A Ohio State - Penn State would also be slightly messy if Penn State would come out on top. I'm hoping for a combination in the Championship game that haven't already played this season. With the conferences consolidating it is probably impossible to limit each conference to one team. But I really don't think having two teams from the same conference, who have already played this season, is the best possible outcome. Although I do believe it is possible the two best teams in the country could be in the same conference. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Capn12 said:

I'm no Beamer apologist, but if you think that wasn't warranted after lardass was mocking his substitution strategy of draining the clock, I'm not sure what else to say...

He wasn't mocking his substitution patterns. Bert and Beamer both said as much. Beamer intentionally was using fake fair catch signals on kickoffs and Bielema took exception to that since it's a good way to get players hurt

Beamer:

"I think he was upset about something that we did on the kickoff return in regards to Juju on the throwback to Nyck Harbor. I would say he needs to check the rule book, because that's something that we cleared with the officials before the game."

Bert:

"Kickoff return is the highest percentage of injury in the sport, so one of the things that coaches began to do was everybody out of respect started T-barring. It's not an official sign. They didn't do anything illegal, but it put us in a position that we now -- the ethics of what that is got evaporated there, because our kids stopped. " 

 

Beamers reaction was insane and over the top regardless.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Texsox said:

The messiest final would be Georgia - Texas Part 3 if Texas would win.  A Ohio State - Penn State would also be slightly messy if Penn State would come out on top. I'm hoping for a combination in the Championship game that haven't already played this season. With the conferences consolidating it is probably impossible to limit each conference to one team. But I really don't think having two teams from the same conference, who have already played this season, is the best possible outcome. Although I do believe it is possible the two best teams in the country could be in the same conference. 

 

But imagine if it was Michigan/OSU Part 2?...hopefully they get at least ND to break up the Big Ten/SEC juggernaut.

The money men must have been scared to death ASU was going to crash their party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone else noticed that since NIL and everyone is paying their players, that SEC football is all of a sudden very average at best? It was ironic to hear Saban complaining about players getting paid with NIL money and teams buying players when he and Alabama (and the rest of the SEC) have been paying players illegally for years and years. 

Off google but shortened with AI: Saban worries that the current NIL landscape allows wealthier schools and alumni networks to provide significantly more lucrative deals to players, creating a "caste system" where some programs have an unfair advantage.

Again, my evidence is that the SEC has been embarrassed this year in bowl games. Why is that? Because now paying players is out in the open and everyone is paying their players, not just the SEC

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, vilehoopster said:

Has anyone else noticed that since NIL and everyone is paying their players, that SEC football is all of a sudden very average at best? It was ironic to hear Saban complaining about players getting paid with NIL money and teams buying players when he and Alabama (and the rest of the SEC) have been paying players illegally for years and years. 

Off google but shortened with AI: Saban worries that the current NIL landscape allows wealthier schools and alumni networks to provide significantly more lucrative deals to players, creating a "caste system" where some programs have an unfair advantage.

Again, my evidence is that the SEC has been embarrassed this year in bowl games. Why is that? Because now paying players is out in the open and everyone is paying their players, not just the SEC

 

It was always the SEC teams that were so against the NIL as well.  Pretty sure Dabo has a bunch of extremely shitty comments about “players don’t need to be paid, the college is payment enough” and Saban always railed against it.  And Saban steps out the side door as soon as it takes effect

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...