Jump to content

24-25 NFL Thread


Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, MexSoxFan#1 said:

Bears could've beaten GB, Minny and Detroit with an above average HC. I can't blame the rookie, Flus should have called the TO, SMH

Postgame guys were saying that this should be a 7-8 win team right now and he is the reason that are not.  There is no more indicting comment than that, from people who have played the profession.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Kyyle23 said:

Postgame guys were saying that this should be a 7-8 win team right now and he is the reason that are not.  There is no more indicting comment than that, from people who have played the profession.

We literally have three game I can remember that we had a 95%, or higher, chance of winning, which the Bears lost.  Those games alone make this a 7 win team.  Pick a game like last week or this week , and that makes 8 without any real crazy "if only" type scenarios.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, bmags said:

Jeanty is awesome but this is also a loaded RB class. Bears should consider it in round 2.

 

50 minutes ago, bmags said:

Jeanty is awesome but this is also a loaded RB class. Bears should consider it in round 2.

RB shouldn’t be anywhere on their draft boards in the Top 4 rounds. Taking a RB is putting the final touches on a complete team, almost like using a 4th on a punter…when this team is dreadfully short on OL and DL, probably the two most important positions on the field after QB…that’s where all their attention should be. This is about the least complicated draft in recent memory for the Bears. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Tony said:

 

RB shouldn’t be anywhere on their draft boards in the Top 4 rounds. Taking a RB is putting the final touches on a complete team, almost like using a 4th on a punter…when this team is dreadfully short on OL and DL, probably the two most important positions on the field after QB…that’s where all their attention should be. This is about the least complicated draft in recent memory for the Bears. 

OL

OL

OL

OL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony said:

 

RB shouldn’t be anywhere on their draft boards in the Top 4 rounds. Taking a RB is putting the final touches on a complete team, almost like using a 4th on a punter…when this team is dreadfully short on OL and DL, probably the two most important positions on the field after QB…that’s where all their attention should be. This is about the least complicated draft in recent memory for the Bears. 

Couldn’t disagree more. You should take what drafts give you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, bmags said:

Couldn’t disagree more. You should take what drafts give you.

Lions showed this too. I do think if I were them I would focus on lines - move in draft where appropriate and use free agency. Interior fixes unless a stud lt prospect is there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bmags said:

Couldn’t disagree more. You should take what drafts give you.

By that logic, in the 2025 draft, if the Bears have pick 12, Pick 35 and pick 45, and the best three players on their draft board at each selection are WR’s, they should take all 3 WR? 
 

There doesn’t have to be a hard and fast rule that you MUST either draft BPA or draft for need, it should be fluid. If the BPA at Pick 10 was a QB, that would be a mistake for the Bears, given their roster and where they are. There will be plenty of players with high draft grades that also fit a need for where the roster is weak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...