Big Ten Fiesta

[cwsox]

You keep refering to the Michigan game, but continue to realize that wasn't a good indication of how good Purdue is. If they were to play again IN WEST LAFAYETTE I think Purdue wins that game.

 

Next time don't disrespect a team you know nothing about because it will come back to bite you in the ass.

you talk just like a cubs fan. If. If. If. If. If Prior pitched. If we played at our place. If. If. If.

 

What was the final score of that game?

 

Michigan is a damn great lot better than Purdue.

 

 

I have no opinion on what Purdue's ranking should be right now. I know Michigan devastated Purdue in every area. Seldom - and I suspect that I have seen a hell of a lot more football games than you and have seen Purdue play more games than you've seen Big 10 games in person in a life time - seldom have I seen a team dominate as Michigan dominated Purdue in 2003. Didn't matter where that game was played. Not one bit.

 

Purdue will finish at best and maybe at worst the 3rd place team in the Big 10. They should get a New Years Day bowl. That sounds exactly right to me. I am not trashing them at all. But they at worst and at best the 3rd place Big 10 team. That is it. They are no more, no less.

[whitesox61382]

you talk just like a cubs fan.  If.  If.  If.  If.  If Prior pitched.  If we played at our place.  If.  If.  If.

 

What was the final score of that game? 

 

Michigan is a damn great lot better than Purdue. 

 

 

I have no opinion on what Purdue's ranking should be right now.  I know Michigan devastated Purdue in every area.  Seldom - and I suspect that I have seen a hell of a lot more football games than you and have seen Purdue play more games than you've seen Big 10 games in person in a life time -  seldom have I seen a team dominate as Michigan dominated Purdue in 2003.  Didn't matter where that game was played.  Not one bit.

 

Purdue will finish at best and maybe at worst the 3rd place team in the Big 10.  They should get a New Years Day bowl.  That sounds exactly right to me. I am not trashing them at all.  But they at worst and at best the 3rd place Big 10 team.  That is it.  They are no more, no less.

What do you expect? Your a Michigan fan whos bias is so great that it blinds you from reality. I love Purdue, but I am smart enough to view things in a realistic many, a lesson Michigan fans have yet to learn.

 

"Michigan is a damn great lot better than Purdue."

 

Is this redneck slang or do you lack the ability to put complete sentences together? At this point Michigan is better, but if you base your opinion towards Purdue on one game, than you are dumber then the above sentence would indicate. What if I pointed to Michigan's performance against Oregon, Iowa, or Minnesota(for 3 quarters) and made a decision based on their poor performances in those games? It also shows that on any given Saturday you can play your worst, and depending on your opponent lose(assuming your opponent is some 1-AA team or bottomfeeders). If you think Purdue can't beat Michigan, especailly outside the Big House, than you are high on crack, because that is nothing more then pie-in-the-sky bias.

 

"Seldom - and I suspect that I have seen a hell of a lot more football games than you and have seen Purdue play more games than you've seen Big 10 games in person in a life time - seldom have I seen a team dominate as Michigan dominated Purdue in 2003. Didn't matter where that game was played. Not one bit."

 

BS, pull your head out of your ass. Have you been drinking because you make absolutely no sense. You must not have watched much football if you think that was the most dominating performance you have seen. Hell, you saw a more dominating performance AGAINST Michigan for 3 quarters earlier in the year against Minnesota. I watched both games, and the way that Minnesota ran all over Michigan and shut them down defensively was MUCH MORE DOMINATING then what Michigan did to Purdue. The fact is that Purdue played their worst game that day and Michigan played their best. On any given Saturday things can be versed, and thats why upsets occur. Why do I waste my time, its obvious your bias is so great that it prohibits anyone from having a logical conversation with you. Continue to show your lack of knowledge on the subject by making a judgement towards a team based on one bad game and I won't have to say a thing. There is a reason why Michigan fans are considered to be some of the dumbest in this country and you help prove this.

 

"Purdue will finish at best and maybe at worst the 3rd place team in the Big 10. They should get a New Years Day bowl. That sounds exactly right to me. I am not trashing them at all. But they at worst and at best the 3rd place Big 10 team. That is it. They are no more, no less."

 

At no point did I suggest that Purdue was the best team in the country or the Big Ten for that matter(I even admitted that Michigan is probably the best team in the Big Ten) I was just pointing out that your fellow retard(I mean Michigan fan) gave Purdue no respect based on one performance, something you also did(shows your stupidity and lack of knowledge on the subject no matter how many games your old ass has seen). You also believe that if Purdue and Michigan played 10 time(5 at each place) that Michigan would win all 10, which is also not true. But like I said before you, your bias blinds you from reality and Michigan is perfect according to you. Get a life old man.

[1549]

whitesox61382 you need to relax.

 

You accuse me and CW of being blind because of our love for our team, but christ your love for Purdue has turned a simple prediction about the game into an attack against me.

 

No doubt Purdue is capable of beating michigan, but not this year, not with the way this team is playing right now. I was at a game at Purdue in 1996 when Purdue upset Michigan 9-3. I remember a game in 2000 when Purdue shut down michigan in the second half to win at Purdue. So I know Purdue can beat Michigan on occasion, as does CW. But you can't avoid the fact that Michigan tore Purdue a new one last time the two teams met.

 

Just take this conversation for what it is, a prediction that Purdue would lose badly. The prediction was false Purdue only lost by 3. Next Saturday Michigan and Ohio St. will meet in the big house to determine who is the big ten champion. Purdue lost to both of those teams and is the third best team in the big ten.

 

31-3 :finger

[cwsox]

1549 - we are dealing with a Purdue fan: "I love Purdue, but I am smart enough to view things in a realistic many..."

 

I suppose that is a typo typical of a redneck fan!

 

the classic defensiveness of a cubs fan - we have a Sox fan who us arguing cubbie style for a team that lost 31-3 and yet still wants to proclaim his team better. And of course he is smarter than us. At this point, we let him believe whatever he wants, it makes no difference and not worth the discussion. He wants to make a point that doesn't exist. So be it.

 

Probably dealing with a high school student from Danville with superior wisdom from watching games on tv rather than actually attending and has all of 2-3 years of tv viewing to draw on. Whatever.

 

He has posed some intelligent comments on the Sox so we will leave him alone in his Purdue fantasies and some day he can go back and find where we didn't say anything about Purdue but was what is true.

[whitesox61382]

"No doubt Purdue is capable of beating michigan, but not this year, not with the way this team is playing right now."

 

You are not getting it. Did Purdue win this year? No. In fact they got beat pretty bad, but that was by far the worst game that they played. Everything that could have went wrong for Purdue did. Conversely, Michigan probably played their best game, and every break seemed to go their way. I guess you can argue that their play created the breaks, but that is certainly debatable. The point is that every now and then even a good team plays s***ty. Thats why you see good teams get upset by lesser opponents AND why good teams can get beat bad by other good teams(the case of the Michigan-Purdue game). However, that is not a good indication of how good Purdue is. You said that it is easy to stop Purdue because Michigan did it, but thats what you are not getting, Michigan was the exception and not the norm. No other team has been able to do what Michigan did, and thats because Purdue is better then they showwed in Ann Arbor. The fact is that you think Michigan is perfect(the 2 loses would argue otherwise) and that if Purdue would have no chance of winning if they played again, which is a pie-in-the-sky view based on one bad game.

 

"I suppose that is a typo typical of a redneck fan! "

 

Sorry cwsox, you come off as a redneck.

 

"the classic defensiveness of a cubs fan - we have a Sox fan who us arguing cubbie style for a team that lost 31-3 and yet still wants to proclaim his team better."

 

Learn to read and comprehend before you post, and put words in my mouth. At no point did I say that Purdue was better then Michigan. In fact MUTLIPLE times I admitted that Michigan was better. My point is that Purdue is more then capable of beating Michigan and are better then you are giving them credit for. Thats not to say that they are better then Michigan though. Please learn to read and comprehend. I realize that reading skills are far from a top priority for rednecks, but its a nice skill to have.

 

"Probably dealing with a high school student from Danville with superior wisdom from watching games on tv rather than actually attending and has all of 2-3 years of tv viewing to draw on. Whatever."

 

You couldn't be any more wrong. Not only have I watched TONS of college football in my time, but I PLAYED D2 FOR 2 YEARS. Do you know what it is like to actually be on the field at the college level(and I don't mean rushing the field after a big win)? Thought not. You can watch thousands of games from the stands, but until you are a player and actually on the field you don't know s*** on the matter. You are like one of those nerdy sports writers who think they know everything even though they have never played a sport their entire life. Its a whole nother world on the field that gives you the closest and most realistic understanding of the game that you will never know about watching it on TV or in the stands. So don't think you know more about the subject.

[cwsox]

yawn