WhiteSox2023 Posted Monday at 09:19 PM Share Posted Monday at 09:19 PM (edited) 36 minutes ago, JoeC said: On some level, it would make sense. Trading for a bounceback candidate who plays a position (pitcher) where the Sox seem to at least not suck at coaching / developing. That said, Beni's 2nd half to me makes him more valuable than Walker. Not so sure on that. It’s a matter of money. I’d probably take Walker’s contract over Benintendi’s just to get out from under it a year earlier. Benintendi (3-years, $47.5M) 2025: $16.5M 2026: $16.5M 2027: $14.5M Walker (2-years, $36M) 2025: $18.0M 2026: $18.0M Edited Monday at 09:32 PM by WhiteSox2023 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted Monday at 09:22 PM Author Share Posted Monday at 09:22 PM JFC Walker was terrible last year (7.12 xERA) and his velocity was also down. Might be better gambling on Benintendi’s bouncing back that Walker. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted Monday at 09:24 PM Share Posted Monday at 09:24 PM 15 minutes ago, almagest said: Cease did not pitch like a TOR starter in 2023 and he only really showed that potential in 2022, so no matter how much fans or the White Sox valued him as one, other teams didn't. The Sox got roughly fair value for him - the question now is if they picked the right prospects to fill that value. This ignores the other option. Cease was back to a >4 WAR pitcher in 2024. His best month of the year was July, and he had a 3.42 ERA at the trade deadline, albeit in San Diego. Holding him to the trade deadline should have been an option. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSox2023 Posted Monday at 09:34 PM Share Posted Monday at 09:34 PM (edited) 14 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said: JFC Walker was terrible last year (7.12 xERA) and his velocity was also down. Might be better gambling on Benintendi’s bouncing back that Walker. They are probably both sunk costs at this point. The Sox are bad the next two years with Benintendi or Walker. I’d take the guarantee of freeing up $14.5 million in 2027. Maybe the rest of the team will have improved enough in two years that it would be nice to have that money in the offseason? Edited Monday at 09:36 PM by WhiteSox2023 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted Monday at 10:10 PM Author Share Posted Monday at 10:10 PM 38 minutes ago, WhiteSox2023 said: They are probably both sunk costs at this point. The Sox are bad the next two years with Benintendi or Walker. I’d take the guarantee of freeing up $14.5 million in 2027. Maybe the rest of the team will have improved enough in two years that it would be nice to have that money in the offseason? I don’t necessarily disagree, but adding Walker requires blocking someone like Bush, Burke, Nastrini, Adams, etc. for a half season. And honestly, I think that is a double negative whereas Benintendi is really not blocking anyone at the moment and worst case blocks one of DeLoach or Fletcher if were to add an OF or DH. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
almagest Posted Monday at 11:52 PM Share Posted Monday at 11:52 PM 2 hours ago, Balta1701 said: This ignores the other option. Cease was back to a >4 WAR pitcher in 2024. His best month of the year was July, and he had a 3.42 ERA at the trade deadline, albeit in San Diego. Holding him to the trade deadline should have been an option. That’s fair, but the Sox didn’t want to take that chance apparently. Also, not sure how the package would change with a rebound year (though still not 2022 level), but with close to 2/3rds of a season less control. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted Monday at 11:52 PM Share Posted Monday at 11:52 PM I read Bowdens article on Crochet market and here are my thoughts: 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boopa1219 Posted Tuesday at 12:36 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 12:36 AM If I’m trading Crochet,I wouldn’t want anyone over the age of 23 coming back to me in any deal. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hi8is Posted Tuesday at 05:41 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 05:41 AM 5 hours ago, bmags said: I read Bowdens article on Crochet market and here are my thoughts: Well said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timmy U Posted Tuesday at 03:22 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 03:22 PM BA just put out the O's top 10. Nothing I didn't know, but bleah. Mayo and Basallo both project as 1b. They're not giving you Kjerstad, but he's 26 and his best position is probably 1b too. Honeycutt and Fabian are highly unlikely to hit enough to get to their other tools. Beavers and Bradfield look like below average regulars/4th outfielders/pinchrunners and Chayce McDermott would be like our 10th ranked pitching prospect. I hope to God Crochet does not go to them. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
almagest Posted Tuesday at 03:42 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 03:42 PM 19 minutes ago, Timmy U said: BA just put out the O's top 10. Nothing I didn't know, but bleah. Mayo and Basallo both project as 1b. They're not giving you Kjerstad, but he's 26 and his best position is probably 1b too. Honeycutt and Fabian are highly unlikely to hit enough to get to their other tools. Beavers and Bradfield look like below average regulars/4th outfielders/pinchrunners and Chayce McDermott would be like our 10th ranked pitching prospect. I hope to God Crochet does not go to them. Wow you mean every single one of these guys won't be very good and on their roster playing different positions? You mean they have a logjam of 1B/DH types and over hyped guys/guys who didn't develop properly? So there's no reinforcements for guys who struggle or leave on their MLB roster? Boy, that's a shame. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUSTgottaBELIEVE Posted Tuesday at 11:13 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 11:13 PM 7 hours ago, Timmy U said: BA just put out the O's top 10. Nothing I didn't know, but bleah. Mayo and Basallo both project as 1b. They're not giving you Kjerstad, but he's 26 and his best position is probably 1b too. Honeycutt and Fabian are highly unlikely to hit enough to get to their other tools. Beavers and Bradfield look like below average regulars/4th outfielders/pinchrunners and Chayce McDermott would be like our 10th ranked pitching prospect. I hope to God Crochet does not go to them. People here laughed a few months ago when I said the Sox farm system is now better than the Orioles. But Orioles fans insisted Elias was going to maintain the farm system at a high standard even while the mlb team was trying to compete and they were no longer drafting in the top 5 every year lol. With Mayo likely to graduate from prospect status by June, they’ll then have just one T100 MLB prospect. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted Tuesday at 11:16 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 11:16 PM 9 minutes ago, JUSTgottaBELIEVE said: People here laughed a few months ago when I said the Sox farm system is now better than the Orioles. But Orioles fans insisted Elias was going to maintain the farm system at a high standard even while the mlb team was trying to compete and they were no longer drafting in the top 5 every year lol. With Mayo likely to graduate from prospect status by June, they’ll then have just one T100 MLB prospect. Quero and Schultz seem very likely to graduate. Montgomery will probably either graduate or will plummet. They will only be drafting 10th, which may or may not give a top 100 prospect. That leaves Smith...who MLB.com also thinks has a decent chance of graduating. How many top 100 prospects will the White Sox have after this year? Entirely depends on trades, right? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestEddy Posted Tuesday at 11:43 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 11:43 PM Red Sox pulling back, a bit? https://www.masslive.com/redsox/2024/11/timetable-for-juan-soto-decision-speeding-up-for-red-sox-other-bidders.html Quote Meanwhile, the (Red) Sox have been quiet of late in the trade talks surrounding the Chicago White Sox’ Garrett Crochet, according to an industry source. Another unidentified team has emerged as “very aggressive” with the White Sox in recent days, though it’s believed the Red Sox still view the lefthander as an attractive option. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted yesterday at 12:12 AM Author Share Posted yesterday at 12:12 AM 30 minutes ago, WestEddy said: Red Sox pulling back, a bit? https://www.masslive.com/redsox/2024/11/timetable-for-juan-soto-decision-speeding-up-for-red-sox-other-bidders.html Mystery team! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted yesterday at 12:19 AM Author Share Posted yesterday at 12:19 AM I still think he ends up on the Phillies. With the Dodgers being a legit super team, other NL contenders need to go big or go home. Miller, Crawford, and a solid third piece gets it done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaleAleSox Posted yesterday at 12:31 AM Share Posted yesterday at 12:31 AM 14 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said: I still think he ends up on the Phillies. With the Dodgers being a legit super team, other NL contenders need to go big or go home. Miller, Crawford, and a solid third piece gets it done. If it's those two then I'll gladly take Bohm from them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted yesterday at 12:47 AM Share Posted yesterday at 12:47 AM 18 minutes ago, PaleAleSox said: If it's those two then I'll gladly take Bohm from them. He does nothing for the Sox with 2 years of control. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSox2023 Posted yesterday at 12:49 AM Share Posted yesterday at 12:49 AM 38 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said: Mystery team! Haha, was about to say it. These rumors are playing out as they usually do. So lame… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenSox Posted yesterday at 12:49 AM Share Posted yesterday at 12:49 AM 39 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said: Mystery team! Giants Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaleAleSox Posted yesterday at 12:49 AM Share Posted yesterday at 12:49 AM 4 minutes ago, Bob Sacamano said: He does nothing for the Sox with 2 years of control. You'd be getting two top 50 prospects along with him, and you can move him for more whenever you'd like. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSox2023 Posted yesterday at 12:50 AM Share Posted yesterday at 12:50 AM 4 minutes ago, Bob Sacamano said: He does nothing for the Sox with 2 years of control. Yeah, but Miller and Crawford would be two good headlining prospects. Then deal Bohm to some other team for a couple lesser, but still good, prospects. Wouldn’t be a bad deal. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted yesterday at 12:56 AM Share Posted yesterday at 12:56 AM If it’s 2 top MLB prospects and Bohm then sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenSox Posted yesterday at 12:58 AM Share Posted yesterday at 12:58 AM 40 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said: I still think he ends up on the Phillies. With the Dodgers being a legit super team, other NL contenders need to go big or go home. Miller, Crawford, and a solid third piece gets it done. The challenge is how to get Philly to give up Miller Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaleAleSox Posted yesterday at 01:10 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:10 AM If there actually is a mystery team, I could see it being the Cubs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.