Jump to content

Non-Tender Day


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, WestEddy said:

The only way I see Benny moving before October 2027 is if he continues his strong 2024 2nd half into 2026, and even then, only if the White Sox eat some of the remaining money. 

Agreed, but he at least showed it may be possible with his stellar second half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, WhiteSox2023 said:

And as expected, @TaylorStSox slinks back into the shadows (a.k.a. his parents’ basement).  No surprise there…

The only thing scarier than @Harold's Leg Lift’s trade rumors is @TaylorStSox drinking a couple beers at night and accusing every other Sox fan of being racist and a bad Sox fan.  🤣

Some people call it "going to sleep."

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, WhiteSox2023 said:

And you responded to my response 4 minutes later, fellow “incel”.  I know you have said in the past that you’re the CEO of your own business, but I would venture to guess that you are full of sh1t.  I’ll post my LinkedIn if you do the same and we can let SoxTalk decide who is full of sh1t.

The funny thing is that only @Harold's Leg Lift has been pushing the idea of including Benintendi in trades of Robert and Crochet for salary relief.  The majority on this board don’t want to make those trades because they know it will neuter the prospect return.

Anyways, I’m actually surprised you aren’t accusing me of being racist as well, as that is your usual game.

What do you say?

Post your LinkedIn, bro. Wtf? 😆I didn't think the incel post would hit home like that. Sorry man. I run a paper route. It's about to take off. I feel it.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, JoeC said:

Sorry. What’s “incel?”

I feel like it’s something I am expected to know, but I feel like asking the question here would be more entertaining than Googling it.

When’s he’s not yelling at any poster who questions the talent of a Sox prospect, he accuses posters of being racist and calls them “incels”.  He also likes to make fun of people for posting too much on a message board, yet here he is posting as well.  It’s been his gimmick for some time now.

Edited by WhiteSox2023
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WhiteSox2023 said:

When’s he’s not yelling at any poster who questions the talent of a Sox prospect, he accuses posters of being racist and calls them “incels”.  He also likes to make fun of people for posting too much on a message board, yet here he is posting as well.  It’s been his gimmick for some time now.

…but what does it mean?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, JoeC said:

Sorry. What’s “incel?”

I feel like it’s something I am expected to know, but I feel like asking the question here would be more entertaining than Googling it.

Involuntarily Celibate. Can't get a girlfriend. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, WestEddy said:

If a sports writer actually "reported" a push to move Benny, even in a Crochet trade, I'd call that smoke. That doesn't seem like something somebody would make up, like so many trade rumors. 

However, it does feel like Getz thought there'd be more desperate interest in acquiring Crochet at the deadline, and could have floated multiple ideas, none of which came to fruition. 

That doesn't say to me that "Getz is definitely trying to package Benny with Crochet", but that doesn't make it clear he wasn't. 

I tend to see admins flogging the package rumor as them trying to whip up comments.

I am not sure if it is worse that you would believe this, or that you would be playing right into our greedy hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, WhiteSox2023 said:

Not sure how accurate this is but maybe it will help?

https://www.spotrac.com/mlb/chicago-white-sox/payroll/_/year/2025

$66,990,000 ?

SoxMachine was saying just shy of $60M, but they may have been missing some retained / dead salary.  I would anticipate a final payroll in the $75M to $80M range, so perhaps we still add a veteran bat and reliever later on in the offseason.  But outside of a Crochet trade and some smaller moves, I think the bulk of the roster is in place.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

SoxMachine was saying just shy of $60M, but they may have been missing some retained / dead salary.  I would anticipate a final payroll in the $75M to $80M range, so perhaps we still add a veteran bat and reliever later on in the offseason.  But outside of a Crochet trade and some smaller moves, I think the bulk of the roster is in place.

Good God. If that is the case, and Montgomery and Quero start the year in the minors, this team could lose 130 games.

  • Paper Bag 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/22/2024 at 6:34 PM, Timmy U said:

Madrigal is a non-tender. Maybe Detroit will pick him up to reunite him with Benetti 


What a terrible trade that was for both sides Chicago.
 
“Rangers re-signed RHP Codi Heuer to a minor league contract.“
Edited by WhiteSox2023
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Chimpton said:

Another great first round pick by the White Sox. Those first round picks of Madrigal and Vaughan who were supposed to be can't miss picks are sure looking bad 5/6 years later.

That's why 'tank' is a four-letter word.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Timmy U said:

Good God. If that is the case, and Montgomery and Quero start the year in the minors, this team could lose 130 games.

Sox aren't trying to win which should be against baseball's rules. Sox should be FINED A LOT of money for disrespecting the game of baseball. The team has no plan and is not trying to win. Reinsdorf should be so ashamed but he's not. Sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, greg775 said:

That's why 'tank' is a four-letter word.

Greg, for the 525,600th time: The Sox were literally barred by the league from tanking last year. They cannot draft higher than #10 despite having lost 121 games.

This isn't tanking. This is simply not trying.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Quin said:

This isn't tanking. This is simply not trying.

Thought provoking. However I dunno. The Sox may be so dumb and misguided they think No. 10 is a nice draft pick to tank for. It's outrageous what is going on in the Sox organization. Is this team really going to do nothing to improve before April 1? Insanity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, greg775 said:

Thought provoking. However I dunno. The Sox may be so dumb and misguided they think No. 10 is a nice draft pick to tank for. It's outrageous what is going on in the Sox organization. Is this team really going to do nothing to improve before April 1? Insanity.

What did you watch the last two seasons,  FFS pay closer attention.  Jerry sucks and is cheap, the end.  Nothing you say about throwing money at problems will help.  This situation is what it is, you keep suggesting the same stupid things that will never happen and the rest of us are merely hoping that someone will draft or sign someone internationally that can possibly be competent for the entire short tenure with the major league club before they are deemed too expensive 

every time you do that stupid “just win, baby” it’s like you are standing in front of a car with no engine telling it “just drive, baby”.  IT DOESNT WORK BECAUSE IT DOESNT HAVE THE RIGHT PARTS AND THE OWNER DOESNT WANT TO BUY THEM OR MAINTAIN THEM

  • Fire 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...