Jump to content

White Sox Top 10 Prospects (BA)


Chicago White Sox

Recommended Posts

  On 12/13/2024 at 4:25 AM, TaylorStSox said:

I still like Gonzalez. He's still only 22. It's too early to call him a bust. I would bet a large sum that at least 2 of those IF's between 15 and 19 will be MLB regulars. That's a really strong top 20. 

Expand  

I started paying attention to him because I like his name. with an 80 grade name like Wikelman, he's destined for success. but really excellent stuff, unfortunately he walks 5 guys per 9.

Oh you're talking about Jacob. I liked him out of college, felt it was a good pick, but I thought he would be more advanced by now. I think he looks better than Colson at SS at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/12/2024 at 3:12 AM, caulfield12 said:

Jacob Gonzalez all the way down to #15.

Meidroth acquisition a direct shot across the bow as he profiled more as a 2B in terms of tools.

Expand  

What a catastrophe that pick was. I hate playing the game of "Look who was drafted after him!!" (Bradfield, Lombard, Aiden Miller, Brice Matthews, BTW), but I'm curious who Mike Shirley was focused on when Jeremy Haber allegedly made the call on Gonzo.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/15/2024 at 6:58 PM, WestEddy said:

What a catastrophe that pick was. I hate playing the game of "Look who was drafted after him!!" (Bradfield, Lombard, Aiden Miller, Brice Matthews, BTW), but I'm curious who Mike Shirley was focused on when Jeremy Haber allegedly made the call on Gonzo.

Expand  

I thought they were taking Arjun Nimmala if Blake Mitchell was off the board. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

"Is Drew Thorpe eligible for this list? I saw him on the list of 204 that received votes. He had 44 innings pitched last year, which is less than the 50 inning rule for ROY if I’m not mistaken. Wondering where he would land. I think he was top 50 before making his MLB debut. He was on the MLB active roster for about 50 days though, not sure if BA goes by the 45 day rule?"

BA.com

Drew Thorpe fell into the others receiving votes category for the BA Top 100...quite the descent from last year.

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/24/2025 at 9:12 PM, WhiteSox2023 said:

A bit ridiculous for Montgomery to be at #39 and for Quero to miss the list altogether.

Expand  

If Quero remains healthy, he'll hit better than 95% of all catchers. His defense isn't a sure thing yet either. Still, not

making the list is silly. He could move to another position and still be very valuable. Hit for average and solid power 

with a ton of walks plays just about anywhere.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/7/2025 at 6:11 PM, Autumn Dreamin said:

BA's Just MIssed (31-40): https://www.baseballamerica.com/stories/10-white-sox-prospects-to-know-beyond-the-top-30-in-2025/

  • Samuel Zavala, OF
  • Tyler Schweitzer, LHP
  • Casey Saucke, OF
  • Ronny Hernandez, C
  • Prelander Berroa, RHP
  • Seth Keener, RHP
  • Nick McClain, OF
  • Luis Reyes, RHP
  • Javier Mogollon, SS
  • Adisyn Coffey, RHP
Expand  

That’s the best 31 to 40 I can remember in at least over a decade.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/8/2025 at 2:19 PM, Y2Jimmy0 said:

The system is really good. I know, shocker haha. 

Expand  

I knew it was much deeper, but seeing some of these names does really reinforce that point.  Zavala would firmly be a top 15 to 20 prospect in most years for us and he’s not even making the top 30.  Imagine if we actually had a LatAm pipeline to supplement the prospects we already have in place.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The Sox have 3 pitchers with legitimate #1 starter stuff. How many teams can say that? If you guessed none you're right.

It's the only bright spot in the organization. If all are pitching well in June, Getz could trade one for 3-4 legit prospects and 

diversify their portfolio. Aces only come around  once in a blue moon. Injuries happen all the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/18/2025 at 10:58 PM, zisk said:

The Sox have 3 pitchers with legitimate #1 starter stuff. How many teams can say that? If you guessed none you're right.

It's the only bright spot in the organization. If all are pitching well in June, Getz could trade one for 3-4 legit prospects and 

diversify their portfolio. Aces only come around  once in a blue moon. Injuries happen all the time. 

Expand  

Counterpoint:  they had EVEN MORE in the 2017-2019 (plus Rodon) and 1998-2000 prospect cycles.

It took the Contreras and Freddy Garcia moves in 2004 to put them over the top coming into the 2005 season.

Odds are that at least 25-33% of pitching prospects will get injured, it's just an irrefutable fact in this age of super max velo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/19/2025 at 2:41 AM, caulfield12 said:

Counterpoint:  they had EVEN MORE in the 2017-2019 (plus Rodon) and 1998-2000 prospect cycles.

It took the Contreras and Freddy Garcia moves in 2004 to put them over the top coming into the 2005 season.

Odds are that at least 25-33% of pitching prospects will get injured, it's just an irrefutable fact in this age of super max velo.

Expand  

These two sentences next to each other are wild.  "Fact", but numbers pulled firmly out of no where.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/19/2025 at 3:09 AM, southsider2k5 said:

These two sentences next to each other are wild.  "Fact", but numbers pulled firmly out of no where.

Expand  

Fine, how confident are you that Schultz, Smith and Taylor won't get hurt in the next 5-7 years?

I suppose there's some study out there that PTAC has access to that we can put an actual number to it...if we can agree to an official date when "max velo" pitching actually started.

 

Then in July of 2013 Will Carroll came out with an article stating that 33% of opening day Major League pitchers had undergone the surgery. I, however, found the study problematic, which I discussed in my previous article.

In March of 2014, Jeff looked at players who threw a pitch 100MPH or harder and found that 25% of them had the surgery. And finally at this year’s Sloan Sports Analytics Conference, Dr. Glenn Fleisig found that 16% of all pitchers had Tommy John, 15% of Minor Leaguers had Tommy John, and 25% of Major Leaguers fell under the knife.

So how does this relate to velocity? Well in my previous article I found that 32% of pitchers who threw 95+ MPH on average had the surgery. If we are to believe Will Carroll’s findings then really there isn’t any significant risk of throwing harder. If we, however, choose to look Dr. Fleisig’s results then throwing harder does increase your chances of having Tommy John.

https://community.fangraphs.com/velocity-and-the-likelihood-of-tommy-john-surgery/

That was almost a decade ago...so the numbers surely have increased from that isolated point in time..

 

"Since the introduction of pitch tracking in 2008, Major League fastball velocities -- and the velocities of other pitch types -- have climbed higher and higher. That increase in velocity has correlated with the increase in pitcher injuries over the same time period."Dec 17, 2024
 

But it's not just fastballs. Pitchers are now chasing "stuff" -- velocity, spin and movement -- on all their pitches, especially with all the tracking technology now available to them. Teams value pitches with higher stuff grades, so pitchers work to attain certain measurables, both during the year with their MLB team and often in the offseason with independent pitch development labs. That also might be increasing stress on pitchers' arms.

"With all the modeling of pitches that goes on now, it’s very binary that higher velo with a better shape is going to yield more positive outcomes. It’s hard for guys to step off the gas because it’s me versus you, and if I’m going to give less than my best effort, and if you hit it over the fence, I’ll be kicking myself because I know I could’ve done more," said a pitching development executive from one MLB team.

Pitchers throwing as hard as they can, or their nastiest breaking ball, with maximum effort every pitch is the combination that the experts surveyed agreed was the likeliest cause of arm injuries. That consensus will help MLB focus its research going forward.

"If we interviewed 200 people, I was concerned that we'd get 200 different answers," Fleisig said. "The fact that there was agreement in this report -- that most people think the No. 1 issue is velocity -- is great. The survey does not prove what the issues are, but it shows us what people [in baseball] think the issues are. So it gives us a gameplan or roadmap for what we should try to solve."

https://www.mlb.com/news/mlb-releases-report-on-pitcher-injuries-2024

.

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...