Jump to content

Winter Meetings Catch-all


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, caulfield12 said:

Who are you moving to 2B to bump Sosa…Vargas?  Ramos?  Baldwin?

You really believe in Montgomery at short?  Or 3B?

I think the lineup eventually moves to this:

 

  1. Tauchman*, RF
  2. Vargas, 3B
  3. Robert, CF
  4. Benintendi*, LF
  5. Vaughn, 1B
  6. Mongomery*, SS
  7. Ramos, DH
  8. Quero#, C
  9. Baldwin#, 2B

Montgomery probably moves off SS eventually, but doesn’t happen right away unless Brooks looks great there and/or we get someone like Mayer in return for Crochet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

I actually don’t hate it.  It’s obviously going to be terrible, but for year 2 of the rebuild and without any of the players we acquire for Crochet & Robert I can live with it.  But I’m also a big Ramos & Baldwin fan admittedly.

It at least has youth in it that has some potential. Especially once whatever OFers we get from trades. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chicago White Sox said:

It’s not moving to the OF…it’s about enhancing his utility.  I actually was thinking about this over night and I actually kind of like this plan for Ramos.  He already plays 3B and 2B, the former fairly well, but will be limited in getting playing time at those spots due to other in-house options.  However, as our primary DH who can fill in at those spots when while also playing some LF, he should be able to get significant playing time next year.  It also strengthens his value long-term if he proves capable in the OF.

Let him learn to play multiple infield positions well. That will provide more than enough utility if he can play 2b and 3b competently while putting up a .700 OPS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

I think the lineup eventually moves to this:

 

  1. Tauchman*, RF
  2. Vargas, 3B
  3. Robert, CF
  4. Benintendi*, LF
  5. Vaughn, 1B
  6. Mongomery*, SS
  7. Ramos, DH
  8. Quero#, C
  9. Baldwin#, 2B

Montgomery probably moves off SS eventually, but doesn’t happen right away unless Brooks looks great there and/or we get someone like Mayer in return for Crochet.

I’d prefer Ramos at 2b, Baldwin at SS, Montgomery at 3b. I’ve seen enough of Vargas and Sosa in the infield. They can DH and super sub multiple positions.

  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chicago White Sox said:

Right now, I think we end up with a lineup this:

  1. Tauchman*, RF
  2. Vargas, 3B
  3. Robert, CF
  4. Benintendi*, LF
  5. Vaughn, 1B
  6. Ramos, DH
  7. Baldwin#, SS
  8. Sosa, 2B
  9. Lee, C

Initial bench of Amaya, Slater, DeLoach*, and a veteran catcher.  Montgomery & Quero called up by May or June, forcing Amaya off the roster and Sosa into a backup IF role.  Prospects from a Crochet trade could also be in the mix.

There aren't enough puke emojis for 2025.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chicago White Sox said:

Right now, I think we end up with a lineup this:

  1. Tauchman*, RF
  2. Vargas, 3B
  3. Robert, CF
  4. Benintendi*, LF
  5. Vaughn, 1B
  6. Ramos, DH
  7. Baldwin#, SS
  8. Sosa, 2B
  9. Lee, C

Initial bench of Amaya, Slater, DeLoach*, and a veteran catcher.  Montgomery & Quero called up by May or June, forcing Amaya off the roster and Sosa into a backup IF role.  Prospects from a Crochet trade could also be in the mix.

I pretty much agree, but it is still early. I was hoping Ramos could stick at 3B because he looks like a big dude that could mash. Ideally if the Sox would sign a decent power hitting DH to a short term deal that would really strengthen the line-up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chicago White Sox said:

Sure, everyone would, but there is a pecking order to these things and right now it appears that Vargas is ahead of Ramos in the eyes of Sox leadership.

Is there any obvious reason for "Vargas to be ahead of Ramos" other than "Getz acquired one of these and not the other, so Getz needs to be made to look good"?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

I think the lineup eventually moves to this:

 

  1. Tauchman*, RF
  2. Vargas, 3B
  3. Robert, CF
  4. Benintendi*, LF
  5. Vaughn, 1B
  6. Mongomery*, SS
  7. Ramos, DH
  8. Quero#, C
  9. Baldwin#, 2B

Montgomery probably moves off SS eventually, but doesn’t happen right away unless Brooks looks great there and/or we get someone like Mayer in return for Crochet.

Straight up question, with all the outfielders they've added, and Ramos being OF'd, you really think both Robert and Benintendi remain on this roster? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Balta1701 said:

Is there any obvious reason for "Vargas to be ahead of Ramos" other than "Getz acquired one of these and not the other, so Getz needs to be made to look good"?

Good question.  Vargas looked awful in the majors last year when I watched him with poor Statcast data supporting that view, but he also put up crazy numbers in AAA that go well beyond just being PCL inflated.  Ramos on the other hand had a very disappointing year at all levels, partially driven by a slow start at AA, but showed more from a tools standpoint (to me at least) to believe he can adjust and become an impactful contributor in the majors.  Both are big question marks at the moment.

However, it’s very unclear to me what Watson and crew saw in Vargas when initially scouting him.  We know he has elite plate discipline, which is a huge plus, but his hit tool did not like within the stratosphere of being a 60 and he looked incredibly weak to me.  Getz did say yesterday that Vargas lost a lot of strength when coming to the White Sox.  No idea how or why, but I guess that could be a thing.  Regardless, Vargas has nothing left to prove in AAA and he should probably be ahead of Ramos in the pecking order for that reason alone.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

“Chandler Rome of The Athletic reports that the the trade talks between Kyle Tucker and the Cubs involve Seiya Suzuki and Isaac Paredes.

Suzuki has recently been mentioned as a potential trade candidate by the Cubs, in part because of his desire to not be a designated hitter. Tucker heading to Chicago would open up right field for him. Meanwhile, Paredes would slide into third base if Alex Bregman was to leave the Astros. There would almost certainly be prospects headed Houston’s way, but this would be a way to move Tucker and not take a massive step backwards for 2025 and 2026. Interesting.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Balta1701 said:

Straight up question, with all the outfielders they've added, and Ramos being OF'd, you really think both Robert and Benintendi remain on this roster? 

That I’m not sure of.  I originally thought the addition of Tauchman meant that one of Robert or Benintendi would likely be traded, but that was before I heard Getz’s cold comments on Fletcher.  No doubt I think they are trying to move them, but I still can’t fathom any team giving up an appropriate package for Robert at this time.  As for Benintendi, he can only be moved in a bad contract for bad contract swap.  The fact that Tauchman just got $2M shows you how little Andrew would be worth if a free agent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Chicago White Sox said:

Right now, I think we end up with a lineup this:

  1. Tauchman*, RF
  2. Vargas, 3B
  3. Robert, CF
  4. Benintendi*, LF
  5. Vaughn, 1B
  6. Ramos, DH
  7. Baldwin#, SS
  8. Sosa, 2B
  9. Lee, C

Initial bench of Amaya, Slater, DeLoach*, and a veteran catcher.  Montgomery & Quero called up by May or June, forcing Amaya off the roster and Sosa into a backup IF role.  Prospects from a Crochet trade could also be in the mix.

Worst. Offense. Ever. Which is saying something after last season.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bob Sacamano said:

Wait, I may have jumped the gun here. I thought MLBN said that he signed. My bad.

Ah, still. Crochet, Fried, the above pillaging and Burnes departure.

Ironically, it looks like a trade for Dylan Cease may be their best hope.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Quin said:

Ah, still. Crochet, Fried, the above pillaging and Burnes departure.

Ironically, it looks like a trade for Dylan Cease may be their best hope.

Yep.  I also wouldn’t be surprised if another team decides to put a cheap unknown starter on the trade block after seeing the White Sox return for Crochet.  However, I doubt the Orioles will ante up like the Red Sox did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, WhiteSox2023 said:

Yep.  I also wouldn’t be surprised if another team decides to put a cheap unknown starter on the trade block after seeing the White Sox return for Crochet.  However, I doubt the Orioles will ante up like the Red Sox did.

If the Astros are actually able to get good value for Tucker from The Cubs I’d almost guarantee they’d trade Valdez as well. That’s the kind of reliable, playoff experienced, innings eating arm Baltimore could use, and the Astros really need 1b help.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...