Jump to content

Cody bellinger to yankees


Whisox05

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Squirmin' for Yermin said:

What a silly trade for a massive market team. You get junk, just to shed a contract (that's not terrible), even though youre 'going for it' this year.

Agreed. I feel like there was room at 1B with him Busch at DH. But then you'd have to move either Happ or Suzuki, who I think both have full no-trade clauses.

Edited by Bob Sacamano
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PaleAleSox said:

Cubs are just as disgraceful as the Sox from a team running standpoint. They should be battling with the big boys and they are pulling this type of stuff? 

They might be clearing his salary to go after another big bat, along with Luzardo and Yates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, PaleAleSox said:

Cubs are just as disgraceful as the Sox from a team running standpoint. They should be battling with the big boys and they are pulling this type of stuff? 

Yeah, not quite.  They just acquired a top ten hitter in baseball.  Meanwhile, the Red Sox use us to groom aces for them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, WhiteSox2023 said:

Yeah, not quite.  They just acquired a top ten hitter in baseball.  Meanwhile, the Red Sox use us to groom aces for them.

They haven't spent any actual money yet and haven't been in on any of these big guys the last few years. But sure man, defend them if you want. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not quite buying the Cubs as Central favorites over Milwaukee, not yet at least...

The odds of keeping Tucker must be like 20-25% at best.

Is this the new Central definition of "all in"?

 

Francona and the Reds would be the team to watch for me.

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, WhiteSox2023 said:

Yeah, not quite.  They just acquired a top ten hitter in baseball.  Meanwhile, the Red Sox use us to groom aces for them.

But the Cubs mostly fill their stadium every game. They should be spending more being the top team in one of the biggest markets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, PaleAleSox said:

They haven't spent any actual money yet and haven't been in on any of these big guys the last few years. But sure man, defend them if you want. 

The Cubs also haven’t been the laughingstock of baseball the past two seasons and didn’t set the modern era loss record.  They have won 83 games in back-to-back seasons.  Not good enough but not historically awful either.  The Cubs had the ninth highest opening day payroll in the MLB last year and just acquired a “big guy”.  Now they get to see if they can re-sign him.  But have the Sox ever even acquired their version of Kyle Tucker?  I’m not defending them, as I am not a Cubs fan, but the truth is that the Cubs are in a far better place than the Sox are.

Edited by WhiteSox2023
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WhiteSox2023 said:

The Cubs also haven’t been the laughingstock of baseball the past two seasons and didn’t set the modern era loss record.  They have won 83 games in back-to-back seasons.  The Cubs had the ninth highest opening day payroll in the MLB last year and just acquired a “big guy”.  Have the Sox acquired their version of Kyle Tucker?  I’m not defending them, as I am not a Cubs fan, but the truth is that the Cubs are in a far better place than the Sox are.

The Cubs should be in a far better place than the Cubs are. That's what I'm saying. For what their resources are in the division they play in, they are clowns too.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, SoxBlanco said:

But we just acquired a top 8 bat in all of baseball with Meidroth.

@Chicago White Sox

Kiley McDaniel did say Meidroth has a 70 grade hit tool / 70 grade plate discipline and that sometimes guys like that turn into surprise superstars.  I personally think he will be a poor man’s Jose Ramirez if he can fatten up a bit and add some power.

  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bob Sacamano said:

Agreed. I feel like there was room at 1B with him Busch at DH. But then you'd have to move either Happ or Suzuki, who I think both have full no-trade clauses.

Is Busch a 1B/DH only nowadays? I was assuming the Cubs would try to get away with him at 2B with Bellinger at 1B. 
No idea how the D would work out, but would for sure have given them 1 hell of a lineup

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TheFutureIsNear said:

Is Busch a 1B/DH only nowadays? I was assuming the Cubs would try to get away with him at 2B with Bellinger at 1B. 
No idea how the D would work out, but would for sure have given them 1 hell of a lineup

 

Agreed and from memory, he’s below average at 3B and has seen a little 2B. Not sure he’s really an option. Would also free them up to use Nico as a trade piece.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cubs fans should be pissed that with all of the financial advantages they have over all of the small market teams in their division they are choosing to be cheap af.  Keep Bellinger AND pay for pitching.   The Cubs are an ATM that prints money.  I wouldn't have thought the Ricketts would be so cheap, but here we are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He kinda sucks at hitting and doesn't really fit anywhere except center field. A good team probably wants a better-hitting first baseman and they have PCA to play center. Perfect fit on the Yankees, I love this for them, they look to be a better team despite losing Soto. 

Think the Cubs definitely could've gotten more than a reliever/salary dump though. I'd be more upset about not retaining a lot more of his salary (they gave Yankees $5m) to get back an actually good player. Maybe they spend it on a player. Unlikely. Why am I getting the feeling that Yoan Moncada will be their starting third baseman?

Edited by nrockway
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TheFutureIsNear said:

Is Busch a 1B/DH only nowadays? I was assuming the Cubs would try to get away with him at 2B with Bellinger at 1B. 
No idea how the D would work out, but would for sure have given them 1 hell of a lineup

 

To put it into perspective, Busch was bad enough at 2b that the Dodgers tried Vargas there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Bob Sacamano said:

Agreed and from memory, he’s below average at 3B and has seen a little 2B. Not sure he’s really an option. Would also free them up to use Nico as a trade piece.

You witnessed Morel trying to hold down a defensive position, I assume...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...