Jump to content

Sox Acquire Tyler Gilbert for Aaron Combs, DFA Braden Shewmake


Heads22

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, PaleAleSox said:

He was the 229th pick. Most of those picks have glaring issues. Come on. 

Oh, sure. But the Sox drafted him for some reason and to trade him for an old AAA reliever is silly.

Especially cause a good front office clearly thinks they're making the better move. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, fathom said:

Stop trading younger players for old, lefty relievers 

Dude maybe he can be ok and then we can flip him at the deadline for an Aaron Combs type guy!

 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Harold's Leg Lift said:

Last year they traded 32 year old left handed reliever Tanner Banks for a player better than Aaron Combs.  

Banks had some history of success in three straight seasons with the Sox before he was traded.  Gilbert hasn’t been good since his rookie season in 2021.

Edited by WhiteSox2023
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:

Apparently the new market inefficiency the Sox have found is old and inexperienced relievers.  So much better than experienced relievers. 

I think you mean 'So much cheaper than experienced relievers'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A 23-year-old 8th round, right-handed reliever that can’t throw strikes. I wonder why you’d select a guy like that to begin with. Who cares. This is only annoying because there are already 1000 pitchers on the team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Quin said:

Oh, sure. But the Sox drafted him for some reason and to trade him for an old AAA reliever is silly.

Especially cause a good front office clearly thinks they're making the better move. 

Philadelphia put Gilbert through waivers. The White Sox claimed him. Instead of pulling him back, the Phillies took a low-A ball bullpen arm in trade. I'm not sure what is silly about picking up a seasoned arm that could be a solid bullpen piece this season rather than developing a college arm for 3 years, taken in what has always been referred to as a weak draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SoxTalk: There are absolutely ZERO prospects in our system. And what does it matter?!? We couldn't even develop them if we had them. 

Also SoxTalk: OMFG!! How could we trade a guy I didn't even know existed until this moment?!? He's clearly a Hall-of-Famer!!

Thanks for the laugh, everyone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like a lot of the guys they've brought in, he's throws a cutter. That seems to be a Bannister trademark. I think this is all about the Sox trying to create value out of essentially fringe players, and flip at the deadline like Tanner Banks last season. Low-risk move. You can always find additional Combs profile-players all across the minors and during the draft - he wasn't even in the top 30.

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, nrockway said:

A 23-year-old 8th round, right-handed reliever that can’t throw strikes. I wonder why you’d select a guy like that to begin with. Who cares. This is only annoying because there are already 1000 pitchers on the team. 

I don't think anyone is gnashing their teeth over losing an 8th round pick, its the trading a 23 year old for a 31 year old who doesn't bring back experience or leadership or any tangible contribution for the use of a 40 man spot. It's just strange.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tnetennba said:

I don't think anyone is gnashing their teeth over losing an 8th round pick, its the trading a 23 year old for a 31 year old who doesn't bring back experience or leadership or any tangible contribution for the use of a 40 man spot. It's just strange.

Stop making sense or you’ll summon westeddy to derail the thread. 

  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, WestEddy said:

Philadelphia put Gilbert through waivers. The White Sox claimed him. Instead of pulling him back, the Phillies took a low-A ball bullpen arm in trade. I'm not sure what is silly about picking up a seasoned arm that could be a solid bullpen piece this season rather than developing a college arm for 3 years, taken in what has always been referred to as a weak draft. 

Cause "seasoned" is the best compliment you can give a bad, old reliever and Getz's entire FO revamp has been stressing his ability to develop guys internally?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Quin said:

Cause "seasoned" is the best compliment you can give a bad, old reliever and Getz's entire FO revamp has been stressing his ability to develop guys internally?

I'd rather keep the low-A bullpen arm honestly, even if he never amounts to anything. Which, knowing the GM's track record for development, seems pretty likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Quin said:

Cause "seasoned" is the best compliment you can give a bad, old reliever and Getz's entire FO revamp has been stressing his ability to develop guys internally?

How do you come to the conclusion that he's "bad"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...