CaliSoxFanViaSWside Posted Sunday at 01:26 AM Share Posted Sunday at 01:26 AM 6 minutes ago, Baron said: I don't think there's a rush. But let's be real these two are going to push the issue. Their stuff is good enough to punish minor league bats. Timetables change and I don't think late 2026 is realistic for those two in their minds. I never said late 2026 I said the beginning of 2026 perhaps . That way you get the whole off-season to play with the roster and remaining options left and who you might want to trade . I'm hoping a lot of the arms are not so marginal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted Sunday at 01:31 AM Share Posted Sunday at 01:31 AM 7 minutes ago, CaliSoxFanViaSWside said: I'm hoping a lot of the arms are not so marginal. Your going to be dissappointed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted Sunday at 01:36 AM Share Posted Sunday at 01:36 AM 7 hours ago, Timmy U said: Bannister likes to give starters some exposure to mlb out of the bullpen when they have basically reached their innings limit a la Iriarte last year. They are not putting Schultz and Smith on the Sale/Crochet plan. Yep, it will be a way to get experience with keeping the innings down. Just a few appearances similar to iriarte this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUSTgottaBELIEVE Posted Sunday at 01:57 AM Share Posted Sunday at 01:57 AM And this here is why I want them to start signing quality free agents now. As usual, if they’re going to start the clock on all but one of their top 7 prospects in 2025, the window to start competing again just got pulled forward. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted Sunday at 02:38 AM Share Posted Sunday at 02:38 AM 1 hour ago, southsider2k5 said: Smith is experienced at pitching late into games, and is a much more polished pitcher than Schultz. In a scenario where he progresses and destroys Charlotte for a couple of months, I would entertain the idea for a Hagen call up, but only after forcing the issue. We don't need to Carlso Rodon him so he spends years at the MLB level learning how to pitch to MLB hitters. Dutch still has so much conditioning and game situations to learn through the early part of his window should be mid to late 26. He has literally never worked with starters stuff. He has literally never thrown more than 68 pitches in a single outing since at least high school or summer leagues in 2022. He didn't thrown any more than 64 pitches in a 2024 outing. Learning to pitch to 100+ pitch outings is every bit as important as how many innings he throws. Carlos Rodon was a normal Hahn callup. A guy who clearly hadn’t shown he was ready at any minor league level but who was called up based on prospect status to save a big league rotation. If we are talking about calling these guys up on April 15th, Rodon is the comp. Midseason, or later, if they’ve actually had a dozen strong starts? Very, very different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harold's Leg Lift Posted Monday at 04:43 PM Share Posted Monday at 04:43 PM On 1/4/2025 at 1:08 PM, Y2Jimmy0 said: I think Schultz makes big league starts in 2025 agreed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
46DidIt Posted Monday at 06:29 PM Share Posted Monday at 06:29 PM I hope that late growth spurt doesn’t throw off Schulz, but seems like it could result in problematic mechanical issues to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliSoxFanViaSWside Posted Monday at 11:25 PM Share Posted Monday at 11:25 PM On 1/4/2025 at 5:31 PM, Baron said: Your going to be dissappointed. It's the reason why the farm is ranked as high as it is. There's at least 5 guys not even in our top 30 who had good RP years in AA and AAA .Some older (26) like McGough and Schoenle . I know the recycle bin is pretty full too so we'll see what happens . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliSoxFanViaSWside Posted Monday at 11:29 PM Share Posted Monday at 11:29 PM On 1/4/2025 at 5:36 PM, ptatc said: Yep, it will be a way to get experience with keeping the innings down. Just a few appearances similar to iriarte this year. It could happen with Schultz. Doubtful on Hagen Smith. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliSoxFanViaSWside Posted Monday at 11:31 PM Share Posted Monday at 11:31 PM On 1/4/2025 at 5:57 PM, JUSTgottaBELIEVE said: And this here is why I want them to start signing quality free agents now. As usual, if they’re going to start the clock on all but one of their top 7 prospects in 2025, the window to start competing again just got pulled forward. They can always get that time back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliSoxFanViaSWside Posted Monday at 11:38 PM Share Posted Monday at 11:38 PM 5 hours ago, 46DidIt said: I hope that late growth spurt doesn’t throw off Schulz, but seems like it could result in problematic mechanical issues to me He seemed to do pretty well while it was happening .Sometimes there is pain or other issues with late growth spurts but it's probable he grew in the off-season and had no trouble with it in season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted yesterday at 04:50 AM Share Posted yesterday at 04:50 AM 5 hours ago, CaliSoxFanViaSWside said: It could happen with Schultz. Doubtful on Hagen Smith. I think ot does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WBWSF Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago Both Tanner Scott and Jeff Hoffman are still free agents. They would improve the White Sox bullpen. Looks like the front office has no interest in signing either one or improving the team. This losing on purpose is terrible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago 4 minutes ago, WBWSF said: Both Tanner Scott and Jeff Hoffman are still free agents. They would improve the White Sox bullpen. Looks like the front office has no interest in signing either one or improving the team. This losing on purpose is terrible. Is accidentally being historically bad any better? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUSTgottaBELIEVE Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago 8 minutes ago, WBWSF said: Both Tanner Scott and Jeff Hoffman are still free agents. They would improve the White Sox bullpen. Looks like the front office has no interest in signing either one or improving the team. This losing on purpose is terrible. Not just that but they’re viable flip candidates for the endless rebuilding cycle. They don’t cost anything other than money and are only “blocking” Justin Anderson from closing. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSox2023 Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago 27 minutes ago, WBWSF said: Both Tanner Scott and Jeff Hoffman are still free agents. They would improve the White Sox bullpen. Looks like the front office has no interest in signing either one or improving the team. This losing on purpose is terrible. Neither guy will be coming here… “Matt Gelb of The Athletic reports that free agent right-hander Jeff Hoffman is seeking a contract in the same range as the three-year, $38 million deal that Clay Holmes signed with the Mets.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago 1 hour ago, WBWSF said: Both Tanner Scott and Jeff Hoffman are still free agents. They would improve the White Sox bullpen. Looks like the front office has no interest in signing either one or improving the team. This losing on purpose is terrible. Ownership is just not spending that type of money this offseason 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago 2 hours ago, JUSTgottaBELIEVE said: Not just that but they’re viable flip candidates for the endless rebuilding cycle. They don’t cost anything other than money and are only “blocking” Justin Anderson from closing. To be fair, guys have to want to come here. I don’t see why Scott would unless you did something so stupid it negates a lot of his value. Maybe there is a better chance with Hoffman because you tell him you’ll commit three to four months of starting without any risk of moving to the bullpen, but again, a better team might offer him the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted 10 hours ago Share Posted 10 hours ago (edited) 23 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said: To be fair, guys have to want to come here. I don’t see why Scott would unless you did something so stupid it negates a lot of his value. Maybe there is a better chance with Hoffman because you tell him you’ll commit three to four months of starting without any risk of moving to the bullpen, but again, a better team might offer him the same. Say...San Diego if they miss on Sasaki? Already familiar/comfortable with NL West. Edited 10 hours ago by caulfield12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUSTgottaBELIEVE Posted 10 hours ago Share Posted 10 hours ago 1 hour ago, Y2Jimmy0 said: Ownership is just not spending that type of money this offseason Or next offseason…or the one after that… 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago 54 minutes ago, JUSTgottaBELIEVE said: Or next offseason…or the one after that… You really can’t wrap your head around the idea that paying market value for free agents when you are multiple years from competing is a bad idea as they will likely be bad when the rest of the team is good. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WBWSF Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 41 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said: You really can’t wrap your head around the idea that paying market value for free agents when you are multiple years from competing is a bad idea as they will likely be bad when the rest of the team is good. A team becomes better with better players. When JR bought the team he bought a bad team. He went out and signed Fisk and Luzinski. Those signings made the team better. Now I realize he's not going to sign anybody decent. He wants a low payroll. If this team ever gets a new owner I would expect he would sign some free agents for some big money just to let fans know that better days are coming. Also, has anybody noticed that JR has completely disappeared from the media? He's probably afraid to meet with the media and answer questions about the White Sox. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestEddy Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 18 minutes ago, WBWSF said: A team becomes better with better players. When JR bought the team he bought a bad team. He went out and signed Fisk and Luzinski. Those signings made the team better. Now I realize he's not going to sign anybody decent. He wants a low payroll. If this team ever gets a new owner I would expect he would sign some free agents for some big money just to let fans know that better days are coming. Also, has anybody noticed that JR has completely disappeared from the media? He's probably afraid to meet with the media and answer questions about the White Sox. I mean, if people are so desperate for Reinsdorf to spend money, maybe hang outside of Alinea on the odd chance JR takes his family there for dinner, and they can watch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snopek Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 42 minutes ago, WBWSF said: A team becomes better with better players. When JR bought the team he bought a bad team. He went out and signed Fisk and Luzinski. Those signings made the team better. Now I realize he's not going to sign anybody decent. He wants a low payroll. If this team ever gets a new owner I would expect he would sign some free agents for some big money just to let fans know that better days are coming. Also, has anybody noticed that JR has completely disappeared from the media? He's probably afraid to meet with the media and answer questions about the White Sox. If the Sox were "normal bad," this might make more sense. But since they went out and made themselves historically bad, it becomes a completely different scenario. They've dug such a deep hole for themselves that signing these players, while it would make the team marginally better in the very short term, would not get the team any closer to contention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, WBWSF said: A team becomes better with better players. When JR bought the team he bought a bad team. He went out and signed Fisk and Luzinski. Those signings made the team better. Now I realize he's not going to sign anybody decent. He wants a low payroll. If this team ever gets a new owner I would expect he would sign some free agents for some big money just to let fans know that better days are coming. Also, has anybody noticed that JR has completely disappeared from the media? He's probably afraid to meet with the media and answer questions about the White Sox. I mean if we want to get right down to it, the Sox signed Carlton Fisk and The Bull after a 90 loss season. The Sox would have to improve 31 whole games to improve to the point where they were as bad as when the Sox signed Fisk and Bull. In that year they moved up to a team that was 2 games over .500 when the strike happened, but make that an entire season, and they are 82-80, or 10 games better than they were the previous year. Are a lot of people running out to buy tickets for this as a 111 loss team instead of a 121 loss team? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.