Jump to content

Vaughn and Sox avoid arbitration: $5.85 million


Bob Sacamano

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, chitownsportsfan said:

I don't care if he was getting paid a dollar. He's not worth a single fucking cent to this team. Maybe he has value as the wrong side of a platoon on a team that is so loaded they can carry a RH DH on the occasional need for a pinch hitter.

The amount of money this sad sack team has spent on worthless players when they could have spent the same on fewer actual good players is mind boggling.

No matter how many times they get burnt, they just keep on doing the same.

The White Sox way for eternity.  Quantity is always better than quality.  Sign as many vet scrubs as you can.  Multiple vet bums that total $20 million for one year is always better than one good player for $20 million.  Getz is and will be using the same playbook as Hahn.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, tray said:

I do not blame the organization for Vaughn's offensive issues which have been the same, year after year.

AV is a short, stout hitter that loads up with a high leg kick to generate power. OK but all too often  he steps in the proverbial bucket and whiffs or comes up short on outside sliders that he can't reach as his left leg is off the ground or in the bucket. Since the Sox are not going to sign a FA power hitter like Santander, Vaughn is probably worth what they have agreed upon.

You don’t blame the very organization that drafted the bust first baseman in the first place?  Your description of AV should have been in the Sox scouting reports when they decided to draft him third overall.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WhiteSox2023 said:

You don’t blame the very organization that drafted the bust first baseman in the first place?  Your description of AV should have been in the Sox scouting reports when they decided to draft him third overall.

Andrew Vaughn was a consensus top 5 draft pick.  Anything else is BS hindsight.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get why most are done with AV. But its not like Sox have any other great options between 1B/DH after Vargas.  May as well give him one more shot to turn into a tradeable asset.  $5.85M is nothing in baseball terms.  If he sucks again, you simply non-tender for 2026 and move along. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WestEddy said:

A "bust" doesn't put up league average production. Andrew Vaughn is a league average hitter. Yes, he needed to be a superstar, being drafted at #3. Calling him a complete bust is silly. 

True to some extent.  But discussing whether a #3 overall pick is worth $6 million or should be DFA after only four seasons at age 26 is pretty damn bad.

Edited by WhiteSox2023
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, WestEddy said:

A "bust" doesn't put up league average production. Andrew Vaughn is a league average hitter. Yes, he needed to be a superstar, being drafted at #3. Calling him a complete bust is silly. 

Except you don't look for your 1B to be "league average".  Their primary job is offense.  You look for "league average" hitters at non-offensive positions.  Your 1B is there to create runs.

Of 1B's last year with 400 or more PAs, his 97 RC+ ranked 29th of 36 hitters.  Factor in his below average 1B defense, he drops to 31st best at 1B.  I mean I guess you can say they picked better than 2nd round pick Gavin Sheets, who is dead last, right?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WestEddy said:

A "bust" doesn't put up league average production. Andrew Vaughn is a league average hitter. Yes, he needed to be a superstar, being drafted at #3. Calling him a complete bust is silly. 

Andrew Vaughn is not a league average 1b offensively though.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:

Except you don't look for your 1B to be "league average".  Their primary job is offense.  You look for "league average" hitters at non-offensive positions.  Your 1B is there to create runs.

Of 1B's last year with 400 or more PAs, his 97 RC+ ranked 29th of 36 hitters.  Factor in his below average 1B defense, he drops to 31st best at 1B.  I mean I guess you can say they picked better than 2nd round pick Gavin Sheets, who is dead last, right?

Obviously. Courtney Hawkins was a bust. Zach Collins was a bust. Andrew Vaughn isn't what he's supposed to be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, WestEddy said:

A "bust" doesn't put up league average production. Andrew Vaughn is a league average hitter. Yes, he needed to be a superstar, being drafted at #3. Calling him a complete bust is silly. 

It will be interesting if a new manager affects some of these guys through better usage, 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Balta1701 said:

They changed that rule? Do you have the new text linkable?

My understanding is if Vaughn went to arbitration, the contract could be voided and he could be released. But, if you agree to a contract with him to avoid arbitration, that contract is guaranteed. Am I mistaken?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Timmy U said:

My understanding is if Vaughn went to arbitration, the contract could be voided and he could be released. But, if you agree to a contract with him to avoid arbitration, that contract is guaranteed. Am I mistaken?

I believe this is correct. By avoiding arb, you're signing them to a guaranteed contract.

Same would go for Penn Murfee, who may didn't have penciled into the pen, and close to the chopping block.  Though his deal would be a much cheaper one to swallow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:

Except you don't look for your 1B to be "league average".  Their primary job is offense.  You look for "league average" hitters at non-offensive positions.  Your 1B is there to create runs.

Of 1B's last year with 400 or more PAs, his 97 RC+ ranked 29th of 36 hitters.  Factor in his below average 1B defense, he drops to 31st best at 1B.  I mean I guess you can say they picked better than 2nd round pick Gavin Sheets, who is dead last, right?

 

26 minutes ago, Balta1701 said:

Andrew Vaughn is not a league average 1b offensively though.

I was going to say, league average is a lower bar than offense at exclusively 1B.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, WestEddy said:

A "bust" doesn't put up league average production. Andrew Vaughn is a league average hitter. Yes, he needed to be a superstar, being drafted at #3. Calling him a complete bust is silly. 

I think it’s all relative to expectations, draft position, etc.

If Vaughn was a fourth round pick, he clearly wouldn’t be a bust. But he was a consensus top 5 pick and seen as a polished hitter who would be a difference maker offensively.

When the results are league average production after that, that’s bust territory IMO.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ChiSox59 said:

I get why most are done with AV. But its not like Sox have any other great options between 1B/DH after Vargas.  May as well give him one more shot to turn into a tradeable asset.  $5.85M is nothing in baseball terms.  If he sucks again, you simply non-tender for 2026 and move along. 

Who knows, maybe he'll be a late bloomer. I doubt it, but you never know.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...