Jump to content

Vaughn and Sox avoid arbitration: $5.85 million


Bob Sacamano

Recommended Posts

I don't care if he was getting paid a dollar. He's not worth a single fucking cent to this team. Maybe he has value as the wrong side of a platoon on a team that is so loaded they can carry a RH DH on the occasional need for a pinch hitter.

The amount of money this sad sack team has spent on worthless players when they could have spent the same on fewer actual good players is mind boggling.

No matter how many times they get burnt, they just keep on doing the same.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JUSTgottaBELIEVE said:

So, we’re up to $14.35M between Rojas, Vaughn, and Perez. That’s about one year of Ha-Seong Kim. Personally, I’d rather have Kim than those three and give Vargas/Elko a look at 1b.

The goal is $30M for 0 or less WAR.  

  • Paper Bag 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will go to the grave believing if Andrew Vaughn was drafted and developed by a better organization, he's a totally different, and better MLB hitter than he is today. What a waste. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Tony said:

I will go to the grave believing if Andrew Vaughn was drafted and developed by a better organization, he's a totally different, and better MLB hitter than he is today. What a waste. 

And he is far from alone.  It is amazing how little we have gotten out of our player development, especially in our high offensive picks.  Andrew Vaughn was a consensus top 5 pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Tony said:

I will go to the grave believing if Andrew Vaughn was drafted and developed by a better organization, he's a totally different, and better MLB hitter than he is today. What a waste. 

I wouldn't quite go that far but if you look at his swing from when he came in to what it was most of last year it's like what the f*** did they have this guy working on. Not only did they manage to introduce a looping load mechanism they also altered his approach it appears so that he never, ever really goes into an AB looking to pull first pitch fastball and hit it hard.

It's like they tried to turn him into a different profile hitter. Obviously the player bares a lot of the blame as well but our coaching sucks and guys regress all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, chitownsportsfan said:

I wouldn't quite go that far but if you look at his swing from when he came in to what it was most of last year it's like what the f*** did they have this guy working on. Not only did they manage to introduce a looping load mechanism they also altered his approach it appears so that he never, ever really goes into an AB looking to pull first pitch fastball and hit it hard.

It's like they tried to turn him into a different profile hitter. Obviously the player bares a lot of the blame as well but our coaching sucks and guys regress all the time.

If not for Torkelson...he would have faced even more criticism, seemingly.

Seems one of the most popular criticisms has been the lack of competition in the Pac-12 compared to say the SEC...and feasting on the subpar/non weekend pitchers for the most part.  And then he went from a disciplined NCAA walk machine to a chaser/guess hitter with a lot of the same characteristics as Luis Robert.

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, JUSTgottaBELIEVE said:

So, we’re up to $14.35M between Rojas, Vaughn, and Perez. That’s about one year of Ha-Seong Kim. Personally, I’d rather have Kim than those three and give Vargas/Elko a look at 1b.

Yeah, that $14M could be put to better use.  Unfortunately, Getz believes the 5th time will be the charm in terms of Vaughn figuring out how to hit major league pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tony said:

I will go to the grave believing if Andrew Vaughn was drafted and developed by a better organization, he's a totally different, and better MLB hitter than he is today. What a waste. 

Skipping the entire upper minors and then being forced to play a position you never played before may be a poor developmental strategy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could make a helluva exciting highlight film with several of Vaughn's at bats. "Sometimes" he whacks beautiful doubles in the gap. Sometimes he actually puts together a few good games in a row. ... But to me most of the time he looks so pained at the plate. Like he's nervous or something. This has to be it for him. Is he a fine hitter or not? If he has another mediocre season he's probably shown the door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Tony said:

I will go to the grave believing if Andrew Vaughn was drafted and developed by a better organization, he's a totally different, and better MLB hitter than he is today. What a waste. 

Not a fan of drafting a 1B not named Frank Thomas.

Vaughn has no speed to play another position for swipe a base.  It's the typical KW pick hoping offense will ignore the other weaknesses.

Here's hoping Getz will make better picks instead of picks from other farm systems.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...