WHarris1 Posted November 29, 2003 Share Posted November 29, 2003 Saw it on ESPN.com. This f***ing pisses me off: Rose Baxter Marshall -For- Antonio Davis Jerome Williams Chris Jefferies It would've been ok to trade Jalen but why trade Donny, Donny is good. And Baxter is a hell of a lot better than Chris Jefferies! Who the f*** is Chris Jefferies. This is a sad day. :fyou Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASHWOUND Posted November 29, 2003 Share Posted November 29, 2003 Saw it on ESPN.com. This f***ing pisses me off: Rose Baxter Marshall -For- Antonio Davis Jerome Williams Chris Jefferies It would've been ok to trade Jalen but why trade Donny, Donny is good. And Baxter is a hell of a lot better than Chris Jefferies! Who the f*** is Chris Jefferies. This is a sad day. :fyou Uhh...I sorta think we got taken on this trade.. I don't mind ridding of Rose, but this doesn't look like a winner..And did we have to get rid of Marshal...he was a solid scorer and rebounder..and who's gonna be scoring for this team? We may have maybe boosted up our D, but we don't have any scorers on this team.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted November 29, 2003 Author Share Posted November 29, 2003 Yeah, I know. Why the hell did we trade Marshall? Jefferies amounts to abseloutly nothing. So we basically just get two rebounders in Davis and Williams. I guess we are gonna have to live with Pippen and Fizer and guys like that to score. (Please excuse me while I got puke) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted November 29, 2003 Author Share Posted November 29, 2003 Here is the link: http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=1673879 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiff Posted November 29, 2003 Share Posted November 29, 2003 They had to match salaries. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 29, 2003 Share Posted November 29, 2003 We got hosed. This was simply to get rid of Rose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danman31 Posted November 29, 2003 Share Posted November 29, 2003 And no Mo Pete in the deal. The one guy I wanted to see for Rose would be Mo Pete because we need a shooter on this team. Paxson hasn't shown me much so far, this worries me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASHWOUND Posted November 29, 2003 Share Posted November 29, 2003 And no Mo Pete in the deal. The one guy I wanted to see for Rose would be Mo Pete because we need a shooter on this team. Paxson hasn't shown me much so far, this worries me. Yeah, the deal may have sounded better with Mo pete.....we got shanked.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 29, 2003 Share Posted November 29, 2003 And no Mo Pete in the deal. The one guy I wanted to see for Rose would be Mo Pete because we need a shooter on this team. Paxson hasn't shown me much so far, this worries me. Well this is only his first move... unless you count Skiles, which I like that move. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubsSuck1 Posted November 29, 2003 Share Posted November 29, 2003 :fyou Paxon, we need a real GM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiff Posted November 29, 2003 Share Posted November 29, 2003 No way they trade Peterson, he's young, good, and still has a year left on his low-salary contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted November 29, 2003 Share Posted November 29, 2003 I do not mind trading Rose in a deal , but ALL they got back were roleplayers, I do not see where they improved 1 tenth of 1% on this deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AssHatSoxFan Posted November 29, 2003 Share Posted November 29, 2003 i am pissed about this deal especially after what we gave up to get rose in the first place Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 29, 2003 Share Posted November 29, 2003 i am pissed about this deal especially after what we gave up to get rose in the first place Good point. how much better would this team be with Brad Miller and Ron Artest. Two guys who know how to play defense and hustle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 29, 2003 Share Posted November 29, 2003 I do not mind trading Rose in a deal , but ALL they got back were roleplayers, I do not see where they improved 1 tenth of 1% on this deal. All this was, was addition by subtraction. The whole league knew that Paxson was desparate to get rid of Rose, and we got hosed for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Showtime Posted November 29, 2003 Share Posted November 29, 2003 People on crack, I love it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Showtime Posted November 29, 2003 Share Posted November 29, 2003 Good point. how much better would this team be with Brad Miller and Ron Artest. Two guys who know how to play defense and hustle. Brad Miller with the Bulls, or the Brad Miller who played with actual NBA players with the Pacers and Kings? See, Brad Miller couldn't play dead for the Bulls, you put him on a team with great players on the floor around him and he's good. Artest is one hell of a player, who is finally on medication after being a ticking timebomb for years. Other teams would kill to have him now, but before everyone was afraid to touch him. Point is this, salaries have to match folks. Dollar for Dollar. Marshall and Rose we're both cancers in that locker room. You bring in two guys who play defense and bring it every night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted November 29, 2003 Share Posted November 29, 2003 Brad Miller with the Bulls, or the Brad Miller who played with actual NBA players with the Pacers and Kings? See, Brad Miller couldn't play dead for the Bulls, you put him on a team with great players on the floor around him and he's good. Artest is one hell of a player, who is finally on medication after being a ticking timebomb for years. Other teams would kill to have him now, but before everyone was afraid to touch him. Point is this, salaries have to match folks. Dollar for Dollar. Marshall and Rose we're both cancers in that locker room. You bring in two guys who play defense and bring it every night. Guys they got back DO NOT bring it every night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molto Posted November 29, 2003 Share Posted November 29, 2003 Williams and Davis are known for being guys who "bring it" every night. I don't think this trade was good as the Bulls should have gotten more, but as bad as this team has played this year, a change needed to happen, which is what it all comes down too. The players the Bulls gave up really weren't of much value to the team and the guys they are bringing in will likely bring a better attitude and effort. I know i'm happy to see Rose gone and I'm looking foward to seeing Williams play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greasywheels121 Posted November 29, 2003 Share Posted November 29, 2003 As a Pacers fan, this just makes me even happier that we got rid of Rose. We got Artest in that deal, and he's been a stud. The Pacers are at a league best 14-2 and Artest has no technical or flagrant fouls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted November 30, 2003 Share Posted November 30, 2003 Williams and Davis are known for being guys who "bring it" every night. I don't think this trade was good as the Bulls should have gotten more, but as bad as this team has played this year, a change needed to happen, which is what it all comes down too. The players the Bulls gave up really weren't of much value to the team and the guys they are bringing in will likely bring a better attitude and effort. I know i'm happy to see Rose gone and I'm looking foward to seeing Williams play. That is not what Toronto newspaper had to say about them, they were classified as both lazy and aloof . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 30, 2003 Share Posted November 30, 2003 That is not what Toronto newspaper had to say about them, they were classified as both lazy and aloof . Of course not. That is what the papers said about Everett and Alomar before they got traded here too. They are just spinning it to make it look good for their own hometown teams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted November 30, 2003 Share Posted November 30, 2003 Of course not. That is what the papers said about Everett and Alomar before they got traded here too. They are just spinning it to make it look good for their own hometown teams. These comments were on Wednesday to the Paper by a Raptor official about the 2 guys we got. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danman31 Posted November 30, 2003 Share Posted November 30, 2003 Well this is only his first move... unless you count Skiles, which I like that move. Kirk Hinrich was another s*** move by Paxson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerbaho-WG Posted November 30, 2003 Share Posted November 30, 2003 Kirk Hinrich was another s*** move by Paxson. f*** yes. T.J. Ford anyone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.