Jump to content

KW Should Sign


jasonxctf

Recommended Posts

Julian Tavarez to a minor league deal with an invite to spring training. Could he be the Loaiza of 2004?

 

10 Wins in 95, 11 in 2000, 10 in 2001, 10 in 2002.

 

 

PITCHING STATS

 

Year Team W L ERA G GS CG SHO SV SVO INN H R ER HR HBP BB SO

1993 CLE 2 2 6.57 8 7 0 0 0 0 37.0 53 29 27 7 2 13 19

1994 CLE 0 1 21.60 1 1 0 0 0 0 1.2 6 8 4 1 0 1 0

1995 CLE 10 2 2.44 57 0 0 0 0 4 85.0 76 36 23 7 3 21 68

1996 CLE 4 7 5.36 51 4 0 0 0 0 80.2 101 49 48 9 1 22 46

1997 SF 6 4 3.87 89 0 0 0 0 3 88.1 91 43 38 6 4 34 38

1998 SF 5 3 3.80 60 0 0 0 1 6 85.1 96 41 36 5 8 36 52

1999 SF 2 0 5.93 47 0 0 0 0 2 54.2 65 38 36 7 8 25 33

2000 COL 11 5 4.43 51 12 1 0 1 1 120.0 124 68 59 11 7 53 62

2001 CHC 10 9 4.52 34 28 0 0 0 0 161.1 172 98 81 13 11 69 107

2002 FLA 10 12 5.39 29 27 0 0 0 1 153.2 188 100 92 9 15 74 67

2003 PIT 3 3 3.66 64 0 0 0 11 14 83.2 75 37 34 1 5 27 39

TOTAL 63 48 4.52 491 79 1 0 13 31 951.1 1047 547 478 76 64 375 531

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure winodj might disagree with you....

 

 

But I agree, if he can keep his homophobic rants down to a minimum, I'd take a flyer on him for 2004.  Not as a starter though--he always seemed more effective out of the 'pen.

"always seem more effective out of the bullpen" is they key there ghost. When you look back at '95, that was his "breakout" year as far as his 1st time in the bullpen. That was also his best year. Loaiza was mostly a starter anyway in his career. Even hawk said in the broadcast (when loaiza was with the blue jays) that when loaiza figures his stuff out or learns a "new pitch" he is going to be something special. He already had the stuff. He just didn't harnest it. Tarvarez dosen't have the stuff for a starter. His wins compared to Loaizas (before this year.) was almost the same, but that dosent mean anything. Tarverez is the next Jose Lima. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd take him out of the bullpen, but not as a starter. I doubt he'd be much more productive than Cotts, Diaz, Rauch, etc. I'd take him over Schoenweiss, though.

 

 

 

By the way I've decided writing Schoenweiss is too hard so from now on we should all refer to him as "The Show."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd take him out of the bullpen, but not as a starter. I doubt he'd be much more productive than Cotts, Diaz, Rauch, etc. I'd take him over Schoenweiss, though.

 

 

 

By the way I've decided writing Schoenweiss is too hard so from now on we should all refer to him as "The Show."

I just call schoenweiss eigher "shoe" or "shoey"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...