DBAHO Posted January 14, 2004 Share Posted January 14, 2004 From TSN and ESPN Mag, Hou really likes Sean Taylor, but it is unknown if they would try to move up for him. Both Cle and Atl want an OT, especially Gallery, and the winner of the coin flip may get him. If not, they may take the other OT, Andrews and leave the other team wanting one. If Dal cuts Gallaway, and Oak starts to rebuild, Tim Brown said he wants to be dealt to Dal. D. Green mentioned the top QB's in the draft as exciting him. McCown said they could stand on the sideline with a clipboard like Palmer. NYG's have talked about taking a QB #4 in order to get Collins, 1yr 7mil left, to agree to a lower $$$ extention. Caughlin would prefer to bring in a Vet QB to back up/compete with Collins and use the pick on a DT or OT. Wash needs a TE but does not want to take Winslow at 5. They would consider trading down for him or Troupe if no DL warrants the pick. Det likes what they saw of Prinner, and will cut lose Stewart before he is due his bonus. Still unknown if they'll draft a RB or DB at 6. Jacksonville did not think they'd get a WR at 9, and were sad. But then their FA CB dissed them to the media, and they don't plan on offering him a deal at all. Darius will also be a FA, and they may tag him again. If Fitz comes out, a WR should fall to 9. They will have to decide whether a WR, CB or S like Taylor is best. Buf wants a TE, Winslow or Troupe and have dumped coaches to improve offensive, but don't plan on taking a WR to start for them. They may have to let their good CB go for money reasons. Pit may let Washington and Scott go, or just Washington, and will probably let Bettis or Amos leave. So RB or CB are the top priorities. NY plans to use Tag on Abraham if needed, but he'll lose 1.5mil a year since it will be based on LB money, not DE. Chi is considering using their 12 mil cap space on a top CB and releasing RW McQuarters or on a DT if a young one is available. Then they could draft an OT. Dungy is going to make a pitch for Sapp, though TB will be making him an offer apon Grudens insistance, just not a large one. They want an OT as well if Chi passes on Dorsey. If Peterson wants more than Arringtons 18 mil bonus, they will have to tag him. CB may go to Cin if SF does not offer more than 4mil a year. Cowboys want to resign Ekuban and CB FA's, but as back-ups. May try to offer low pick for Dillon or Martin, which would free up money in NY. Bill wants to bring in a Vet QB, but not Warner or Brunnell, a young, strong arm guy like Delhome sp?, Billy Volek sp? from Ten. Hou and Min may give up 1/3 picks for Ogunleye if tagged. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted January 14, 2004 Share Posted January 14, 2004 As long as the Bears get someone in one of the lines (O or D) I will be happy. And to me that could either be a big name FA or their #1 pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baggio202 Posted January 14, 2004 Share Posted January 14, 2004 since it seems like we might have our QB of the future (crossing my fingers on that one) i would go with the o - line first..give this kid every chance to suceed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted January 14, 2004 Share Posted January 14, 2004 Well there are some really good corners via FA, so I'd be pretty happy with that. Oline is probably a good pick early, but if Andrews/Gallery aren't there, it seems like you could hold to the 2nd and the talent level is very similar in the 2nd round OT's as the other 1st round OT's. I'd probably then go DT in the first and OT in the 2nd, CB in FA, WR/RB in the 3rd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted January 14, 2004 Share Posted January 14, 2004 By the Bills good CB, do they mention which one? Because both Clements and Winfield are pretty damn good CBs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Honda Civic Posted January 14, 2004 Share Posted January 14, 2004 Dungy is going to make a pitch for Sapp, though TB will be making him an offer apon Grudens insistance, just not a large one. They want an OT as well if Chi passes on Dorsey. Somebody explain this to me please. Is Dorsey an OT??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted January 14, 2004 Share Posted January 14, 2004 Somebody explain this to me please. Is Dorsey an OT??? Ya, Nat Dorsey, he's supposed to be the 3rd best tackle in the draft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.