aboz56 Posted January 27, 2004 Share Posted January 27, 2004 http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/americas/01/...e.ap/index.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan420 Posted January 28, 2004 Share Posted January 28, 2004 thats why you go to canada, alot better product and the people are not hardcore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1549 Posted January 28, 2004 Share Posted January 28, 2004 thats why you go to canada, alot better product and the people are not hardcore. Of course the safest choice would just be to avoid drugs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan420 Posted January 28, 2004 Share Posted January 28, 2004 Of course the safest choice would just be to avoid drugs nah canadians are harmless Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrimsonWeltall Posted January 28, 2004 Share Posted January 28, 2004 you werent supposed to find those Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1549 Posted January 28, 2004 Share Posted January 28, 2004 btw, does anyone else think that the anti-drug commercials are ridiculously reaching for a reason why people shouldn't do drugs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan420 Posted January 28, 2004 Share Posted January 28, 2004 btw, does anyone else think that the anti-drug commercials are ridiculously reaching for a reason why people shouldn't do drugs? yea that baby drowning because you where high is pretty lame!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowerCaseRepublican Posted January 28, 2004 Share Posted January 28, 2004 Commissioned by President Nixon in 1972, the National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse concluded that "Marihuana's relative potential for harm to the vast majority of individual users and its actual impact on society does not justify a social policy designed to seek out and firmly punish those who use it. This judgment is based on prevalent use patterns, on behavior exhibited by the vast majority of users and on our interpretations of existing medical and scientific data. This position also is consistent with the estimate by law enforcement personnel that the elimination of use is unattainable." And modern science has just shown more medicinal usages for marijuana that make this entire war a complete failure of federal funds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted January 28, 2004 Share Posted January 28, 2004 Chicago is still the murder capitol of the US. Murders have been few here on the Texas - Mexico border. McAllen is a city of 115,000 and I believe we had 1 murder in town last year. Within the past couple of years the Rio Grande Valley has seen a few multiple homicides, always linked to the drug trade. But for the most part the Mexico border towns are much safer than many Chicago neighborhoods. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan420 Posted January 28, 2004 Share Posted January 28, 2004 Chicago is still the murder capitol of the US. Murders have been few here on the Texas - Mexico border. McAllen is a city of 115,000 and I believe we had 1 murder in town last year. Within the past couple of years the Rio Grande Valley has seen a few multiple homicides, always linked to the drug trade. But for the most part the Mexico border towns are much safer than many Chicago neighborhoods. chicago sounds like fun to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxin' Posted January 28, 2004 Share Posted January 28, 2004 Chicago is still the murder capitol of the US. But Gary has the most per capita. It is a very scary place to go through because everyone just looks at you funny. So many people do drugs from Gary at my school it is almost sickening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxy Posted January 28, 2004 Share Posted January 28, 2004 Commissioned by President Nixon in 1972, the National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse concluded that "Marihuana's relative potential for harm to the vast majority of individual users and its actual impact on society does not justify a social policy designed to seek out and firmly punish those who use it. This judgment is based on prevalent use patterns, on behavior exhibited by the vast majority of users and on our interpretations of existing medical and scientific data. This position also is consistent with the estimate by law enforcement personnel that the elimination of use is unattainable." And modern science has just shown more medicinal usages for marijuana that make this entire war a complete failure of federal funds. Sideshow, I believe Nixon never actually read that report--he heard a summary of it and threw it away as it contradicted what he thought about the weed.. And I agree with whomever said the go to Canada for it. We're getting all of our other drugs (prescription stuff) from Canada so why not "marihuana" too. Plus, I've "heard" they have better stuff up there... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan420 Posted January 28, 2004 Share Posted January 28, 2004 Sideshow, I believe Nixon never actually read that report--he heard a summary of it and threw it away as it contradicted what he thought about the weed.. And I agree with whomever said the go to Canada for it. We're getting all of our other drugs (prescription stuff) from Canada so why not "marihuana" too. Plus, I've "heard" they have better stuff up there... canada is nicer and better product i can verify that for a fact from dealing with both of them. the prices are a little higher but worth every penny of it if your gonna be in that stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.