Jump to content

Mel Gibson


cwsox

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 374
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I was also born and raised Catholic but, I got over it.  (Hi. my name is Flaxx, I am a recovering Catholic and I have been clean for 19 years.)

 

Go back and dig into the now-infamous Palistinian-Israeli thread (if you dare), to see cw's and Soxy's educated responses to these claims.

 

John Dominic Crossan is a former priest who has written 3 books on the historical, rather than the mythical, Jesus.  His most recent book is Who Killed Jesus ?: Exposing the Roots of Anti-Semitism in the Gospel Story of the Death of Jesus. It is controversial in that it flatly calls the Gospels' insistence on Jewish responsibility for Jesus' death "Christianity's longest lie."

 

But the fact that Crossan is focusing extensively on the historical facts and not the Gospel's claims makes it a hard book to refute on any grounds other than faith-based grounds.  He drives home the point that the Gospels are "prophesy historicized" and not accurate history, they look at the prophesies of the Old Testament and then make the current events of the day fit in with those prophesies.  He points out that the early Christians were persecuted by the more numerous Jews, so a healthy dose of anti-Semitism tossed into the Gospels is not hard to understand.  Crossan's chief contention is that it was the Romans that did the deed out of fear of civil unrest Jesus and his followers would bring to Judea.  I started into the book sitting at Barnes and Noble one day last month and need to go buy it and read it through.

thank you for emntioning the graet Bible scholar Crossan -

 

your summary of his writings is excellent indeed

 

and that is what I believe

 

it was Rome that killed Jesus

 

Rome

 

When the 2nd generation Christians wanted to be recognised by Rome and after Rome had destroyed Jerusalem in 70 AD the Jews were made scapegoats to absolve Rome

 

The conflict that killed Jesus was to whom is highest allegiance owed: Rome, Ceasar, OR God. Render to Ceasar... render to God...

 

Because Ceasar literaly claimed to be the Son of God, Jesus had to go.

 

And the Romans did it in about 30 CE (aka 30 AD).

 

After 70 AD - when the Gospels were written - it was prudent to blame someone other than Rome. And so it happened.

 

But it is still in the accounts - the place where the phgrase "you are no friend of Ceasar" and "we have no king but Ceasar" are Roman words, not Jewish words - and that is why Rome killed Jesus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jewish/Hebrew is an ethnicity (probably what whoever that was, was trying to say rather than race). You can be a Jew who doesn't practice Judaism. Einstein, for example.

Ok, I should have clarified for the rubes: it's a SUB-race (or rather, sub-division of a race), ethnicity.

 

Semites, on the other hand, are a full-fledged RACE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jews , romans..i think its a pretty safe bet to say both had a hand in jesus ending up on the cross...but wasnt that reason jesus was sent to earth??...to be sacrificed for our sins??..if the romans , the jews , or whoever one wants to lay blame on who killed jesus didnt do it...we wouldnt be saved...

 

it doesnt matter to me whether it was the romans or the jews who killed jesus...it was all part of God's plan so that we could walk with Him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't go to the movies to learn about faith or history. We go for entertainment.

Ok, you were speaking for yourself and yourself only. Got it. Since you only consider YOUR perspective/motives for wanting to see Passions.....I will spare you the whole Triumph of the Will/ propaganda/ fueling millenium-long religious and ethnic hatred lecture. You're welcome.

 

Then again, whether you LEARN from or are AFFECTED by a movie is NOT up to YOU to decide. Your sub- and super-consciousness, over which we have little control, do most of the work for you. Reality check-- that's how the complex human psyche works. You can go in out of pure entertainment motives and leave totally transfixed and/or f***ed-up for life. :lol:

 

And for such an escapist-minded person, you sure as hell picked the WRONG kind of a movie. It's VERY serious thematically, it's VERY real in how it depicts violence, etc, etc, etc.

 

I would recommend, renting a Wedding Planner instead. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there are ways to tell the story without inferring "the Jews" killed Jesus and there are ways of telling it in a antiSemitic hate version and by all accouin ts of the script Gibson has gone for the latter way which is his andf his father's long held personal theology

 

1. There wouldn't much fun in being a hard-core Catholic if you couldn't tell the other side (jews, muslims, atheists, more moderate factions, etc) how morally wrong and historically f***ed-up they are, pesky facts and immoral truth-stretching be damned (npi). Without huge relevant controversy, why would people want see the movie, right? Last Temptation of Christ by that Greek dork had a VERY poor BO. It was no Braveheart epic. :nono

 

2. Mel Gibson's father could give Aunuld's father a run for his money in the slimey-f*** department.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jews , romans..i think its a pretty safe bet to say both had a hand in jesus ending up on the cross...but wasnt that reason jesus was sent to earth??...to be sacrificed for our sins??..if the romans , the jews , or whoever one wants to lay blame on who killed jesus didnt do it...we wouldnt be saved...

 

it doesnt matter to me whether it was the romans or the jews who killed jesus...it was all part of God's plan so that we could walk with Him...

thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't spare me - what was this movie all about?

on my list of best films ever - recent thread - also on most critics lists -

 

it is about Nazis and the Nuremberg rallies of Hitler

 

it is great cinema and revolutionized movie making with its shots and angles and other techniques

 

it is about dreadful evil and hate and glorifies it

 

it was on my list with those caveats to say the least

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jews , romans..i think its a pretty safe bet to say both had a hand in jesus ending up on the cross...but wasnt that reason jesus was sent to earth??...to be sacrificed for our sins??..if the romans , the jews , or whoever one wants to lay blame on who killed jesus didnt do it...we wouldnt be saved...

 

it doesnt matter to me whether it was the romans or the jews who killed jesus...it was all part of God's plan so that we could walk with Him...

 

exactly,

 

The point isn't who killed Him, but that He died. if we start arguing about who is responsible and for what reasons then you missed the point of the whole thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jews , romans..i think its a pretty safe bet to say both had a hand in jesus ending up on the cross...but wasnt that reason jesus was sent to earth??...to be sacrificed for our sins??..if the romans , the jews , or whoever one wants to lay blame on who killed jesus didnt do it...we wouldnt be saved...

 

it doesnt matter to me whether it was the romans or the jews who killed jesus...it was all part of God's plan so that we could walk with Him...

Excellent, Bags! :headbang

 

You put to words what I was thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

on my list of best films ever - recent thread - also on most critics lists -

 

it is about Nazis and the Nuremberg rallies of Hitler

 

it is great cinema and revolutionized movie making with its shots and angles and other techniques

 

it is about dreadful evil and hate and glorifies it

 

it was on my list with those caveats to say the least

Yeah, but the quesiton is, is it as good as Zelig?

 

 

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh oh, we disagree :ph34r:

 

Triumph of the Will

 

 

Triumph was the Nuremburg rallies -

 

the 1936 Olympics was her movie "Olympiad" equally brilliant and horrible

No I know, you're right, that fourth article was a total brain fart on my part. It should be replaced with the N-rallies.

 

Jesse Ownes was pretty good, eh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...