baggio202 Posted February 21, 2004 Share Posted February 21, 2004 just heard on the news that ralph nader is seriously considering entering the race for the presidency in '04....report also says that leading democrats are furiouswith him as they blame him for gore's defeat in '00... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldmember Posted February 21, 2004 Share Posted February 21, 2004 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted February 21, 2004 Share Posted February 21, 2004 Maybe Dean will run with Nader as his running mate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baggio202 Posted February 21, 2004 Author Share Posted February 21, 2004 Maybe Dean will run with Nader as his running mate or the good rev al Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted February 21, 2004 Share Posted February 21, 2004 It's a dirty underhanded republican trick! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Critic Posted February 21, 2004 Share Posted February 21, 2004 Nader may actually be a Republican operative, sent in to destroy the chances of any threatening Democratic presidential candidate. How very clever, indeed - disguise a Republican spy as a political outsider, have him appeal to the undecided and disenfranchised voters, sway them AWAY from the Democratic candidate and ensure 4 more years for GW. ....it ALLLLLLLL makes sense to me now...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baggio202 Posted February 21, 2004 Author Share Posted February 21, 2004 i think its funny democrats keep whinning about nader stealing the '00 election from gore...thats a bunch of bull...the people who voted for nader voted for him because they didnt feel either major party candidate offer them a viable option...so what makes the democrats think gore was entitled to those votes...he didnt earn them or those people would have voted for him its the same with republicans in '92 when they say perot cost GHW the election...i voted for perot and i did so because neither candidate from the major parties appealed to me...neither main candidate earned my vote.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted February 21, 2004 Share Posted February 21, 2004 I'll say this, if a good third party candidate was out there, I wouldn't vote for Bush. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted February 21, 2004 Share Posted February 21, 2004 I'll say this, if a good third party candidate was out there, I wouldn't vote for Bush. I would agree and say Ralph Nader isn't it! Guliani or McCain would be guys I would think about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowerCaseRepublican Posted February 21, 2004 Share Posted February 21, 2004 He's such a self serving douche. Even most Green party affiliates are mobilizing with Dem candidates under the banner of ousting Bush from office. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandoFan Posted February 21, 2004 Share Posted February 21, 2004 Nader may actually be a Republican operative, sent in to destroy the chances of any threatening Democratic presidential candidate Yep, with his 45-yo voting record and activist platforms, how could anyone not believe he's a GOP plant. *Apu chorus* Nader's such a douche Anyone but Bush! Some people still can't get over the fact that it's wasn't Ralph Nader who squandered the 2000 election for the Dems. It wasn't even Katharine Harris. It was ALL AL GORE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted February 21, 2004 Share Posted February 21, 2004 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowerCaseRepublican Posted February 21, 2004 Share Posted February 21, 2004 Yep, with his 45-yo voting record and activist platforms, how could anyone not believe he's a GOP plant. *Apu chorus* Nader's such a douche Anyone but Bush! Some people still can't get over the fact that it's wasn't Ralph Nader who squandered the 2000 election for the Dems. It wasn't even Katharine Harris. It was ALL AL GORE. I know it was all Al Gore. I'm just stating now that even Greens and Dems can agree (well most of them at that) that Bush needs to go and the Greens can focus on 2008 especially since they are nowhere close to getting the 5% threshhold to get federal matching funds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.