Texsox Posted March 31, 2004 Author Share Posted March 31, 2004 Did anyone consider the families of his victims? How do you think they would have felt knowing that the person who murderered their family members is (was) allowed to function in society? Maybe by lying about his past, he denied a position to someone else who could have been an excellant professor and NOT have been a murderer. If you would like to debate the length of his sentence, I would agree he got out earlier than I think was fair. I used him as an example of someone who was rehabilitated and was a functioning, contributing member of society. I believe he is no longer a threat to anyone. I also believe other criminals have also been rehablitated. Should someone who serves his sentence be allowed to earn a living and just how good of a living should it be? Should we tell them they have forfeited their right to hold any position? If he was a janitor, would you argue he took the job away from someone who would be a great janitor and hadn't committed a crime? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queen Prawn Posted March 31, 2004 Share Posted March 31, 2004 A. Innocent until proven guilty. B. Just because someone is accused of a crime, doesn't mean they forfeit their rights. C. Just because someone is innocent doesn't mean they should forfeit their rights. Which statement of mine where you quoting? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted March 31, 2004 Author Share Posted March 31, 2004 Which statement of mine where you quoting? I wasn't. I goofed and hit quote instead of reply. Let me fix that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.