Spiff Posted April 2, 2004 Share Posted April 2, 2004 NAME G AB R H 2B 3B HR TB RBI BB SO SB CS BA OBP SLG OPS Bradley 101 377 61 121 34 2 10 189 56 64 73 17 7 .321 .421 .501 .923 Rowand 93 157 22 45 8 0 6 71 24 7 21 0 0 .287 .327 .452 .780 I am a Rowand fan but there's no way you can say he's better than Bradley. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSteve Posted April 2, 2004 Share Posted April 2, 2004 While I usaully dont, I agree 100% with Josh on this one. This team has been hitting the s*** out the ball during ST, no need to bring a new, big name guy, who is also known as a cancer around the league. Dont screw around with something that is broken. Big name guy? We all know who Milton Bradley is, well I assume most of us. The Tribe do not have any big name guys, I think CC is going to be real good though. I would take him, but we do not need him. If he came here, I would not be sad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted April 2, 2004 Share Posted April 2, 2004 NAME G AB R H 2B 3B HR TB RBI BB SO SB CS BA OBP SLG OPS Bradley 101 377 61 121 34 2 10 189 56 64 73 17 7 .321 .421 .501 .923 Rowand 93 157 22 45 8 0 6 71 24 7 21 0 0 .287 .327 .452 .780 I am a Rowand fan but there's no way you can say he's better than Bradley. There is one way. Milton Bradley is a terrible CF. He is lazy, doesn't pay attention, and gets terrible breaks on the ball. I remember last year watching him turn two fly outs into triples in one game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WillieHarris2 Posted April 2, 2004 Share Posted April 2, 2004 i dont think having bradley on the team would do us any good. i would much rather have someone who's the lesser player but gives his all day in and day out instead of a superstar who doesnt give his all day in and day out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted April 2, 2004 Share Posted April 2, 2004 NAME G AB R H 2B 3B HR TB RBI BB SO SB CS BA OBP SLG OPS Bradley 101 377 61 121 34 2 10 189 56 64 73 17 7 .321 .421 .501 .923 Rowand 93 157 22 45 8 0 6 71 24 7 21 0 0 .287 .327 .452 .780 I am a Rowand fan but there's no way you can say he's better than Bradley. Regardless. I don't want someone who thinks he's too damn good to hustle over someone who'll crash into walls to catch a flyball. No thanks. Keep ARow and to hell with gameboy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Chappas Posted April 2, 2004 Share Posted April 2, 2004 Didn't the Sox win a game because he stopped running and a great relay got him at the plate. I beleive it was late in teh game and he was the tying or go ahead run and it changed the whole momentum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Controlled Chaos Posted April 2, 2004 Share Posted April 2, 2004 I remember screaming...MILTON BRADLEY YOU SUCK. GO DIRECTLY TO JAIL...DO NOT PASS GO DO NOT COLLECT $200.00!!!!!! and I do recall him f***in up an easy pop up that game that resulted in a triple. I'm not sure if this is the same instance SS2K is referring too. I'll stick with Rowand. I just want so bad for this kid to get a legitimate shot. He impresses every time he is given a chance ...except beginning of last year and I beleive he was still injured at that time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted April 2, 2004 Share Posted April 2, 2004 I remember screaming...MILTON BRADLEY YOU SUCK. GO DIRECTLY TO JAIL...DO NOT PASS GO DO NOT COLLECT $200.00!!!!!! and I do recall him f***in up an easy pop up that game that resulted in a triple. I'm not sure if this is the same instance SS2K is referring too. I'll stick with Rowand. I just want so bad for this kid to get a legitimate shot. He impresses every time he is given a chance ...except beginning of last year and I beleive he was still injured at that time. BINGO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSF Posted April 2, 2004 Share Posted April 2, 2004 I'm curious as to why the Mets would rather have Bradley in center than Cameron. Could you please explain your logic? Apparently I was on to something: Mets GM Jim Duquette confirmed yesterday that he has interest in acquiring Milton Bradley to play right field. The Mets likely will offer Aaron Heilman or Tyler Yates and perhaps one of their second-tied offensive prospects for Bradley. Scott Kazmir and David Wright figure to be off limits. Source: New York Times I could see the New Yorkers booing him on a daily basis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queen Prawn Posted April 2, 2004 Share Posted April 2, 2004 I gotta ask the same question as Bighurt52235: why would the Mets rather have Bradley in center than Cameron? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSF Posted April 2, 2004 Share Posted April 2, 2004 I gotta ask the same question as Bighurt52235: why would the Mets rather have Bradley in center than Cameron? I'm too lazy to re-type: It's not as much as they would prefer Bradley in center, but more that he would probably cover more ground than Cameron. Honestly, either could play center and the other would be fine in right. I also thought the Mets might prefer to have Cameron and his strong throwing arm in RF. That's my logic, at least. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queen Prawn Posted April 2, 2004 Share Posted April 2, 2004 My reading abilities are slipping like crazy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSteve Posted April 2, 2004 Share Posted April 2, 2004 I gotta ask the same question as Bighurt52235: why would the Mets rather have Bradley in center than Cameron? Who says that is the case? Maybe he would become their 4th OF. Or, maybe he would move to left. I dont think even the Mets have any idea what they are doing, they just see a skilled, yet lazy, player they can get for cheap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queen Prawn Posted April 2, 2004 Share Posted April 2, 2004 I can't believe any GM would want that guy. He is trouble with a capital 'T.' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xero Posted April 4, 2004 Share Posted April 4, 2004 They decided now to option him to AAA Buffalo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSF Posted April 4, 2004 Share Posted April 4, 2004 They decided now to option him to AAA Buffalo. That's what they were doing. Not anymore: Frankli Gutierrez - OF - CLE Apr. 4 - 3:37 pm et Indians aquired outfielder Franklin Gutierrez and a player to be named from the Dodgers for outfielder Milton Bradley. The Indians managed to get another quality young outfielder in return for Bradley. Gutierrez, 21, has excellent power potential, and although he still swings at too many bad pitches, he has a better idea of what he's doing than most tools prospects his age. He could become the Indians' right fielder in the second half of 2005 or in 2006. Milton Bradley - OF - LA Apr. 4 - 3:34 pm et Dodgers acquired troubled outfielder Milton Bradley from the Cleveland Indians on Sunday for Franklin Gutierrez and a player to be named. Bradley is wearing Dodger Blue. Pray for Jim Tracy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted April 4, 2004 Share Posted April 4, 2004 Wow, they actually got a good prospect for him. Very good trade for the Indians. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted April 4, 2004 Share Posted April 4, 2004 DBAHO, you should move to Vegas! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted April 4, 2004 Share Posted April 4, 2004 How the hell, did they get Guiterez out of that deal. The tribe was giving up on the guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.