Jump to content

Aaron Miles


DonkeyKongerko

Recommended Posts

I can't understand that about Juan either.  To me he's looked great with the stick so far this year and also out in Tucson.  I am just waiting patiently until we start to discover the D'Angelo Jimenez qualities about him... :ph34r:

Shhhhh.... :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The current distances of the fence are already longer than most ballparks.  So your "6%" is already accounted for.

 

If Coors will make Miles such a great hitter, then why didn't it do the same for Uribe??

No they aren't that's what my post said. 400 plus the 6% is 424, not 415 like it is now, ect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No they aren't that's what my post said.  400 plus the 6% is 424, not 415 like it is now, ect.

I'm no mathemetician, but I would think that the total area of the outfield of Coors Field is close to 6% larger than the average park.

 

An even bigger outfield would have an adverse affect on pitching and cause even more runs to be scored. As recently as a few years ago, they were considering moving the fences in, figuring it would cut down on runs scored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rex is right with the outfield situation.

 

To sum it up, Coors Field has a Park Factor of 1.126, highest of any park in the majors. To break it down mathematically, say that the average park gives up, say 500 runs, just to be easy with the math. With a PF of 1.126, that can translate into Coors scoring 112.6% of runs in a "neutral park".

 

So 500 x 1.126 = 563 runs, 63 runs more than a neutral park.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm no mathemetician, but I would think that the total area of the outfield of Coors Field is close to 6% larger than the average park. 

 

An even bigger outfield would have an adverse affect on pitching and cause even more runs to be scored.  As recently as a few years ago, they were considering moving the fences in, figuring it would cut down on runs scored.

That was exactly what I said if you read my post again. That you can't move the fence because more runs would be scored on doubles and triples, but that the guy who says it's easier to hit home runs, has a valid point physics wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was exactly what I said if you read my post again.  That you can't move the fence because more runs would be scored on doubles and triples, but that the guy who says it's easier to hit home runs, has a valid point physics wise.

so we agree or disagree? im confused........ lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...