SoxAce Posted May 31, 2004 Share Posted May 31, 2004 Here they are: Randy Johnson Tom Glavine Steve Trachsel Joe Kennedy Freddy Garcia Kaz Ishii Odalis Perez Kip Wells Toma Ohka Al Leiter Jeff Weaver Jamie Moyer Shawn Estes Kris Benson We could get anyone of these pitchers. Some might cost more than others, and some we shouldn't even get , but all of them are theoretically avaliable. I would like to hear which guy any of you would go after and why. I will post mine in a bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T R U Posted May 31, 2004 Share Posted May 31, 2004 I doubt the Mets would trade anyone right now Same with LA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted May 31, 2004 Share Posted May 31, 2004 Randy Johnson-I would love to have him, too much to give up I think. Tom Glavine-Yes please. Steve Trachsel-Having a solid year, I would take him. Joe Kennedy-Also have a decent year, could be servicable. Freddy Garcia-Yes. Kaz Ishii-Yep, LA may want a lot, I dunno. Odalis Perez-Yes. Kip Wells-No. Toma Ohka-Intriging, could be a dependable 5th. Al Leiter-YES! Jeff Weaver-Nope. Jamie Moyer-Sure Shawn Estes-Hell no. Kris Benson-Nope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammerhead johnson Posted May 31, 2004 Share Posted May 31, 2004 Here they are: Randy Johnson Tom Glavine Steve Trachsel Joe Kennedy Freddy Garcia Kaz Ishii Odalis Perez Kip Wells Toma Ohka Al Leiter Jeff Weaver Jamie Moyer Shawn Estes Kris Benson We could get anyone of these pitchers. Some might cost more than others, and some we shouldn't even get , but all of them are theoretically avaliable. I would like to hear which guy any of you would go after and why. I will post mine in a bit. Randy Johnson and Tom Glavine (to a lesser degree) are the only two that would improve our chances of winning a World Series. I have my eyes on the prize, although I'm not so sure about others if all this Freddy Garcia talk is any indication. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSGuy406 Posted May 31, 2004 Share Posted May 31, 2004 Tom Glavine - I would love to have him. He'd bring playoff experience, and he's been awesome thus far. I wouldn't mind a playoff rotation of Buerhle-Loaiza-Glavine. Freddy Garcia-I think he would be a great fit here in Chicago. He and Ozzie are buddies, so I think Oz would find a way to get the best out of him. He has awesome stuff, he just tends to be mentally unstable up on the mound sometimes, which is where I think Oz would help out. Kip Wells - I'd love to have Kipper back. He's been solid with the Bucs, but I dunno if he would be able to help in the playoffs. That's why I tend to like Glavine/Garcia more, but then again, I don't know his mentality. He could be just as good in the playoffs as a Garcia would be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 Actually, Trachsel has proven that he can be effective in NY, so he can handle "the spotlight". He may be someone that we can pick up reasonably cheap if we don't want to pay the price for a #1 or #2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmmmmbeeer Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 Randy Johnson and Tom Glavine (to a lesser degree) are the only two that would improve our chances of winning a World Series. I have my eyes on the prize, although I'm not so sure about others if all this Freddy Garcia talk is any indication. Agreed, those are the two that would take us to the promised land. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighHeat45 Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 LA is in first in the NL West, why would they be willing to give up their starters Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 Agreed, those are the two that would take us to the promised land. Garcia is better then Glavine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 LA is in first in the NL West, why would they be willing to give up their starters I agree, and if LA would trade anyone, Odalis Perez and Wilson Alvarez would be better options than Weaver IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxman352000 Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 Shawn Estes-Hell no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beck72 Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 I added another name to the list on another thread--Tony Armas, Jr. He's making his first major league start in over a year today. With his $2.1 mill salary, he should be theoretically available from Montreal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmmmmbeeer Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 Garcia is better then Glavine. I think we'll have to disagree there. In 17 years Glavine has only had 5 years with an ERA over 4 and has never allowed more than 30HRs in a season. Not to mention the huge amount of postseason experience he's had (194IP). He didn't pitch great last season, but he didn't exactly pitch poorly either. Looked more like an off year considering he was 18-11 with a 2.96ERA in 2002. Garcia on the other hand has 3 seasons with an ERA over 4.00 in just 5 years of pitching. He's allowed more than 30HRs twice in that 5 year span, this should be a concern considering the Cell is a hitter's park. Garcia has only pitched 34 innings of postseason ball. Glavine would have a tremendous impact on Buehrle and Schoe, showing them the ropes. Freddy Garcia wouldn't help anyone on our staff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IlliniKrush Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 Who would be a better playoff pitcher, Garcia (power) or Glavine (finesse)? Something to think about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beck72 Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 Who would be a better playoff pitcher, Garcia (power) or Glavine (finesse)? Something to think about. I'd be more partial to the Sox getting a power pitcher rather than a finesse pitcher myself, even if the names aren't Garcia and Glavine. Esp. as the Sox are lacking the former and have two LH finesse pitchers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 How about this for a couple of crazy theoretical names. Matt Clement and/or Kerry Wood. What if the Cubs injuries continue and they freefall out of the race. Both Wood and Clement are eligible for free agency after this season, and the Cubs don't sound like they are going to bring back Clement. Would one of these guys be someone we should deal for, and who should we give up for them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 The Cubs aren't going to fall out of the race soon enough for that. They believe when they get healthy, they'll be right in the thick of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmmmmbeeer Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 Who would be a better playoff pitcher, Garcia (power) or Glavine (finesse)? Something to think about. If I wanted power pitcher I'd go after Big Unit. Freddy Garcia is not the answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IlliniKrush Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 I'd say there's a snowball's chance in hell of that happening. They will compete with a healthy squad. They are hanging in as is. Let's say they did fall completely out and were looking to deal. Do you think they'd trade someone of Wood's status to the other side of town? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Godfather Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 Of all the players on that list many of them are not even close to the radar screen for the sox. The sox dont want to take on guys who have HUGE contracts for more then one year ala Randy Johnson / Tom Glavine forget about it wont happen. We should be loooking more on the line of Freddy Garcia who makes like 6 mil but seattle would pick up some of his pay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 If I wanted power pitcher I'd go after Big Unit. Freddy Garcia is not the answer. Johnson will finish the season with the D'Backs. Book it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammerhead johnson Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 I think we'll have to disagree there. In 17 years Glavine has only had 5 years with an ERA over 4 and has never allowed more than 30HRs in a season. Not to mention the huge amount of postseason experience he's had (194IP). He didn't pitch great last season, but he didn't exactly pitch poorly either. Looked more like an off year considering he was 18-11 with a 2.96ERA in 2002. Garcia on the other hand has 3 seasons with an ERA over 4.00 in just 5 years of pitching. He's allowed more than 30HRs twice in that 5 year span, this should be a concern considering the Cell is a hitter's park. Garcia has only pitched 34 innings of postseason ball. Glavine would have a tremendous impact on Buehrle and Schoe, showing them the ropes. Freddy Garcia wouldn't help anyone on our staff. The playoff rotation would be set up like this: 1. Glavine (194 IP in the playoffs!) 2. Loaiza 3. Buehrle (home opener against the Yankees) 4. Garland Works for me! As opposed to: 1. Buehrle 2. Loaiza 3. Garcia (home opener against the Yankees?) 4. Garland I say hell no! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KevHead0881 Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 Personally, I think Freddie Garcia will be the best "available" in that I don't think half of those guys listed are going anywhere. Although, if I thought that the Mets were truly shopping Glavine around, he'd move to the top on my list. You might want to add Livan Hernandez to the list. I'm not exactly high on him, but he's posted some pretty solid numbers for a horrible Montreal team. He's also been a stud in the playoffs, which believe it or not, hold some importance now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
striker Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 I say don't gamble and get someone that isn't consistent. Get someone that is awesome and let's run with this division. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 Steve Tracshel is a head case. You dont need some guy being brought in here for half the year and start s***. NO for Traschal Ok ... I'm listening. Why is Trachsel a head case? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.