cwsox Posted June 26, 2004 Share Posted June 26, 2004 This is a thread to discuss Republican public virtues! Dear, please lower your shoulder a litttle, the camera can't pick up the Vote Republican button on your right nipple! we need to do something about Janet Jackson! Indecent language on the airwaves! We believe in family values! Pass a law! f*** you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubKilla Posted June 26, 2004 Share Posted June 26, 2004 Not as bad as getting your cock sucked in the Oval Office, while you're married. And both Democrats and Republicans are hypocrites. Deal with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
israel4ever Posted June 26, 2004 Share Posted June 26, 2004 Sexual "indiscretions" , or whether a candidate smoked pot while they were in college has nothing to do with whether or not an individual makes a good President, Senator, whatsoever! The sooner we as Americans get this through our (Puritanical) heads, the better off we will be! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxman352000 Posted June 26, 2004 Share Posted June 26, 2004 Not as bad as getting your cock sucked in the Oval Office, while you're married. And both Democrats and Republicans are hypocrites. Deal with it. Exactly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowerCaseRepublican Posted June 26, 2004 Share Posted June 26, 2004 When a candidate (or party) runs on moral purity and creates the idea that the opposition is a group of cultural hedonists, then it is most appropriate for items like Neil Bush getting herpes in Hong Kong in his orgy romps with prostitutes while married etc. When the GOP demands that they want to "protect the sanctity of marriage", they should look no further than Rush Limbaugh or Newt Gingrich etc. etc. etc. ad nauseaum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1549 Posted June 26, 2004 Share Posted June 26, 2004 When a candidate (or party) runs on moral purity and creates the idea that the opposition is a group of cultural hedonists, then it is most appropriate for items like Neil Bush getting herpes in Hong Kong in his orgy romps with prostitutes while married etc. When the GOP demands that they want to "protect the sanctity of marriage", they should look no further than Rush Limbaugh or Newt Gingrich etc. etc. etc. ad nauseaum. That was nicely put. I don't think the republican voter cares about the morales of the politicians they elect, as long as the laws they pass are considered moral or christian or whatever you want to call it. If I was married to Gerri Ryan, I would want people to see me having sex with her too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IlliniBob72 Posted June 26, 2004 Share Posted June 26, 2004 This is a thread to discuss Republican public virtues! Dear, please lower your shoulder a litttle, the camera can't pick up the Vote Republican button on your right nipple! we need to do something about Janet Jackson! Indecent language on the airwaves! We believe in family values! Pass a law! f*** you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1549 Posted June 26, 2004 Share Posted June 26, 2004 that should not count as a post Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IlliniBob72 Posted June 26, 2004 Share Posted June 26, 2004 that should not count as a post Why Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IlliniBob72 Posted June 26, 2004 Share Posted June 26, 2004 that should not count as a post not Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IlliniBob72 Posted June 26, 2004 Share Posted June 26, 2004 that should not count as a post ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1549 Posted June 26, 2004 Share Posted June 26, 2004 thats one way to boost the old post count Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sox4lifeinPA Posted June 26, 2004 Share Posted June 26, 2004 so a republican secretly devoid of values and pandering to the christian vote is worse than a Democrat booster pretending to be a Christian minister that secretly seeks to remove any power from the message of the Cross by undermining clearly stated moral guidelines in the Bible? ok, just checking. ...just saying Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted June 26, 2004 Share Posted June 26, 2004 What the hell is the point of this thread? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted June 26, 2004 Share Posted June 26, 2004 What the hell is the point of this thread? Give 'em inch and they take a mile.. :headshake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
israel4ever Posted June 26, 2004 Share Posted June 26, 2004 When a candidate (or party) runs on moral purity and creates the idea that the opposition is a group of cultural hedonists, then it is most appropriate for items like Neil Bush getting herpes in Hong Kong in his orgy romps with prostitutes while married etc. When the GOP demands that they want to "protect the sanctity of marriage", they should look no further than Rush Limbaugh or Newt Gingrich etc. etc. etc. ad nauseaum. Right on, Apu!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sox4lifeinPA Posted June 26, 2004 Share Posted June 26, 2004 What the hell is the point of this thread? Give 'em inch and they take a mile.. who started this thread? I couldn't see on my computer? *cough* *cough* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandoFan Posted June 26, 2004 Share Posted June 26, 2004 so a republican secretly devoid of values and pandering to the christian vote is worse than a Democrat booster pretending to be a Christian minister that secretly seeks to remove any power from the message of the Cross by undermining clearly stated moral guidelines in the Bible? ok, just checking. ...just saying Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSteve Posted June 26, 2004 Share Posted June 26, 2004 Huh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cwsox Posted June 27, 2004 Author Share Posted June 27, 2004 When a candidate (or party) runs on moral purity and creates the idea that the opposition is a group of cultural hedonists, then it is most appropriate for items like Neil Bush getting herpes in Hong Kong in his orgy romps with prostitutes while married etc. When the GOP demands that they want to "protect the sanctity of marriage", they should look no further than Rush Limbaugh or Newt Gingrich etc. etc. etc. ad nauseaum. thank you someone asked the point of the thread? On the same day the Senate Republicans push a bill in the Senate to get touch on dirty words on the radio and Janet Jackson dancing at the Super Bowl -- the vice president of the US, who is under the constitution the president of the senate, is saying f*** you to a US Senatior, Patrick Leahy of Vermont, and of course this is the same Cheney who ran with Bush to supposedly bring civility to the political process - and as researched, that has never been said by a vice president to a senator on the Senate floor in US history so it is a new low - been said off the floor, but civility and decorum seem to be lacking in the administration that pledged itself to that based on what the Senate passed, a radio or tv station could be fined severly for quoting accurately the vice president of the US on the same day the Republican nominee for the US Senate in Illinois is dealing with his sex cluib scandalsand ain't that a tad hypocritical for someone who has run as a moral beacon in a party that is open to that charge of hypocrasy as Apu has pointed out - all the "moral denuniciations" on this board only seem to go one way and it gets tiring and tiresome and I posted to green to use satire, not to attack, a distinction lost on some Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted June 27, 2004 Share Posted June 27, 2004 Much ado about one candidate in one race. Every party has members who would switch parties in a heartbeat if they thought it would give them an edge in getting elected. Maybe this guy could run as a Democrat? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox_Sonix Posted June 27, 2004 Share Posted June 27, 2004 who started this thread? I couldn't see on my computer? *cough* *cough* Guess Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.