CubsSuck1 Posted June 30, 2004 Share Posted June 30, 2004 Chicago White Sox: Freddy Garcia, Mark Buehrle, Esteban Loaiza 20-12, 328.2 Innings Pitched, 88 Walks, 235 Strikeouts, 152 Earned Runs, 339 hits, 1.30 WHIP, 4.16 ERA Oakland Athletics: Tim Hudson, Mark Mulder, Barry Zito 21-10, 312.2 Innings Pitched, 95 Walks, 198 Strikeouts, 117 Earned Runs, 304 hits, 1.28 WHIP, 3.37 ERA Boston Red Sox: Curt Schilling, Pedro Martinez, Derek Lowe 24-14, 297 Innings Pitched, 83 Walks, 237 Strikeouts, 133 Earned Runs, 303 Hits, 1.30 WHIP, 3.42 ERA New York Yankees: Javier Vazquez, Mike Mussina, Kevin Brown 25-10, 285 Innings Pitched, 61 Walks, 193 Strikeouts, 128 Earned Runs, 291 Hits, 1.24 WHIP, 4.04 ERA Houston Astros: Roger Clemens, Wade Miller, Roy Oswalt 23-15, 293.2 Innings Pitched, 103 Walks, 266 Strikeouts, 106 Earned Runs, 265 Hits, 1.25 WHIP, 3.25 ERA Chicago Cubs: Carlos Zambrano, Matt Clement, Greg Maddux 21-15, 302 Innings Pitched, 86 Walks, 268 Strikeouts, 112 Earned Runs, 279 Hits, 1.21 WHIP, 3.34 ERA Food for thought Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greasywheels121 Posted June 30, 2004 Share Posted June 30, 2004 Tastes good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mac9001 Posted June 30, 2004 Share Posted June 30, 2004 There's a reason why our ERA is so high; our guys have stayed in games to take some beatings (which also explains the IP gap). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Chappas Posted June 30, 2004 Share Posted June 30, 2004 This is nice but one of the guys has never thrown a pitch for us. Please enter Garland into this and compare. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted June 30, 2004 Share Posted June 30, 2004 I think the point of the thread was to show how our newly improved pitching staff compares to everyone else. Putting Garland into that would make no sense, as we already know that we are not as good as the other top 3 when he is there. No need to beat a dead point. SB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSGuy406 Posted June 30, 2004 Share Posted June 30, 2004 I think the point of the thread was to show how our newly improved pitching staff compares to everyone else. Putting Garland into that would make no sense, as we already know that we are not as good as the other top 3 when he is there. No need to beat a dead point. SB We've also had some really, really poor outings (sans yesterday) out of Buerhle/Loaiza lately, that wasn't really normal. Overall, I think our Top 3 ERA will improve to right around four, give or take a couple of points. And I'd be happy if it could stay around four, too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted July 1, 2004 Share Posted July 1, 2004 With USCF surrendering more HR's than even Coors Field, you'd have to expect our ERA's to be somewhat higher. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted July 1, 2004 Share Posted July 1, 2004 With USCF surrendering more HR's than even Coors Field, you'd have to expect our ERA's to be somewhat higher. Yup Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yoda Posted July 1, 2004 Share Posted July 1, 2004 Did I see Maddux in there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish Posted July 1, 2004 Share Posted July 1, 2004 With USCF surrendering more HR's than even Coors Field, you'd have to expect our ERA's to be somewhat higher. Just a question, but does anyone think that the home run totals at our park has more to do with our lineup than the park itself. I mean it does seem like the ball is flying out a lot more this year than in previous years, however we seem to hit home runs no matter where we play. If we played in the Metrodome I am sure that would become one of the best home run parks. Just a question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammerhead johnson Posted July 1, 2004 Share Posted July 1, 2004 Just a question, but does anyone think that the home run totals at our park has more to do with our lineup than the park itself. I mean it does seem like the ball is flying out a lot more this year than in previous years, however we seem to hit home runs no matter where we play. If we played in the Metrodome I am sure that would become one of the best home run parks. Just a question. Do some research, mang. Buehrle, Loaiza, Garland, and Schoeneweis all have ERAs between 3.40 and 3.80 ON THE ROAD. Garcia was at 3.90 ON THE ROAD before yesterday's game. And what are their overall ERAs? Between 4.20 and 4.75, correct? And what does this indicate to you? Comiskey Park is a freaking hellhole now. One of my least favorite parks without question, right up there with Arlington and Coors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulokis Posted July 1, 2004 Share Posted July 1, 2004 It's just good to finally have good 3 starting pitchers that you can compare to the best rotation in the league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.