southsider2k5 Posted July 6, 2004 Share Posted July 6, 2004 http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/06/...y.vp/index.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted July 6, 2004 Share Posted July 6, 2004 I like John Edwards. If the ticket were reversed, I would vote for him. How screwy is that? And, Cheney - Edwards debates ought to be interesting! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baggio202 Posted July 6, 2004 Share Posted July 6, 2004 should have picked hillary..it was a gaurenteed winning ticket...now if bush can get cheney to step down gracefully and put colin powell on the ticket..its a slam dunk for the GOP.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted July 6, 2004 Share Posted July 6, 2004 should have picked hillary..it was a gaurenteed winning ticket...now if bush can get cheney to step down gracefully and put colin powell on the ticket..its a slam dunk for the GOP.. Neva, NEVA, happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted July 6, 2004 Share Posted July 6, 2004 I'm surprised no "no more Dick in the White House" jokes have surfaced... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Posted July 6, 2004 Share Posted July 6, 2004 Now that Edwards is running with him, can't he just see the future and see if they win? If not, Kerry could save $$$. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuskyCaucasian Posted July 6, 2004 Share Posted July 6, 2004 WOW! big suprise there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxman352000 Posted July 6, 2004 Share Posted July 6, 2004 Kerry made the right choice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 6, 2004 Author Share Posted July 6, 2004 Edwards email announcement text Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted July 6, 2004 Share Posted July 6, 2004 By the way, doesn't this remind you of Dan Quayle in '88 as a pick? A Jr. Senator, who has little experience? But I bet your bottom dollar that Edwards won't get crucified like Quayle did... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
israel4ever Posted July 6, 2004 Share Posted July 6, 2004 should have picked hillary..it was a gaurenteed winning ticket...now if bush can get cheney to step down gracefully and put colin powell on the ticket..its a slam dunk for the GOP.. I disagree! Colin Powell is an asshole! Bush would be better off without him! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowerCaseRepublican Posted July 6, 2004 Share Posted July 6, 2004 By the way, doesn't this remind you of Dan Quayle in '88 as a pick? A Jr. Senator, who has little experience? But I bet your bottom dollar that Edwards won't get crucified like Quayle did... That all depends if Edwards knows how to spell potato. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted July 6, 2004 Share Posted July 6, 2004 I knew that was coming from somewhere out there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 6, 2004 Author Share Posted July 6, 2004 You spell potatoe, I spell potato... I spell tomato, you spell tomatoe... Lets call the whole thing off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greasywheels121 Posted July 6, 2004 Share Posted July 6, 2004 Where in IN was Quayle from? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted July 6, 2004 Share Posted July 6, 2004 Huntington. I was there for when they showed up, GWHB and Quayle, in front of the courthouse because my dad worked at the building across the street at the time. What a circus. The media tore him a new one that day... That was really my first experience in remembering the bias of the media. I would have been 15. It all came together that day... Here was a guy with humble background just getting his ass kicked over, even at 15, what I thought was stupidity. But, I guess I could have looked at it differently... but that wouldn't be any fun, would it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
israel4ever Posted July 6, 2004 Share Posted July 6, 2004 Quayle was (is) a dumbass, but, he was 100% right about the need for Tort Reform. Way too many frivilous lawsuits in this country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 6, 2004 Author Share Posted July 6, 2004 Where in IN was Quayle from? You live in Ft Wayne and you haven't been down to the Dan Quayle Muesuem in lovely Huntington IN? For shame Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greasywheels121 Posted July 6, 2004 Share Posted July 6, 2004 You live in Ft Wayne and you haven't been down to the Dan Quayle Muesuem in lovely Huntington IN? For shame Am I missing out, or am I missing out? Do we get a complimentary bag of Seyfert's potatoe chips for visiting? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted July 6, 2004 Share Posted July 6, 2004 You couldn't hold Dan Quayle's jock on a bad day, to quote, "dumbass". The man is VERY intelligent, but he was not a good speech person - hence where everyone smacks him down. He had a ton of good ideas, and was one of the best intended folks I can remember in Washington, before all the crap with the media caught up to him. Tort reform Family issues, which Clinton championed, were largely brought to the forefront by Quayle. He was a "true" conservative, not what we have in the White House today, that's for darn sure. I could go on, but I better get something accomplished since I have piddled half the day away... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox_Sonix Posted July 6, 2004 Share Posted July 6, 2004 I really dont mind Edwards that much. If the ticket was reversed i really dont know who i would vote for Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
israel4ever Posted July 6, 2004 Share Posted July 6, 2004 You couldn't hold Dan Quayle's jock on a bad day, to quote, "dumbass". The man is VERY intelligent, but he was not a good speech person - hence where everyone smacks him down. He had a ton of good ideas, and was one of the best intended folks I can remember in Washington, before all the crap with the media caught up to him. Tort reform Family issues, which Clinton championed, were largely brought to the forefront by Quayle. He was a "true" conservative, not what we have in the White House today, that's for darn sure. I could go on, but I better get something accomplished since I have piddled half the day away... Don't equate conservativism with intelligence! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted July 6, 2004 Share Posted July 6, 2004 I didn't, you just did. Each stands alone, in this case. Why does "liberalism" have to equate intelligence? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 6, 2004 Author Share Posted July 6, 2004 I didn't, you just did. Each stands alone, in this case. Why does "liberalism" have to equate intelligence? I would have to say narrowmindedness would be much more anti-intelligent than either side of US politics... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Be Good Posted July 6, 2004 Share Posted July 6, 2004 KERRY AND EDWARDS IN '04!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.