southsider2k5 Posted August 30, 2004 Share Posted August 30, 2004 In exchange for arranging meets for Chinese nationals with the SEC. http://www.judicialwatch.org/3800.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted August 30, 2004 Share Posted August 30, 2004 shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... the media can never know this! Oh wait, even if they do, they won't report it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted August 30, 2004 Author Share Posted August 30, 2004 shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... the media can never know this! Oh wait, even if they do, they won't report it. These reports have been around forever. Basically when they connected Clinton with Chung, they knew who else had taken money, Kerry being one of them. The information about Kerry setting them up in front of the SEC came about a little later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowerCaseRepublican Posted August 30, 2004 Share Posted August 30, 2004 Judicial Watch is good people. They're the ones that sued Cheney for his Energy documents when he had that meeting with big members of Enron etc. to decide Energy policy. After they won the court case, Cheney appealed and lost again. Then he put the documents under the vast blanket of "executive privilege". Only problem is the idea of a polygraph test to determine if this guy is telling the truth? In 1997, an FBI agent by the name of Drew Richardson who had dealt with polygraphs for 25 years as an agent. He stated under oath in the Senate Judiciary Committee about using polygraphs to question people in sensitive positions: "It is completely without any theoretical foundation and has absolutely no validity. Although there is disagreement among scientists about the use of polygraph testing in criminal matters, there is almost universal agreement that polygraph screening is completely invalid and should be stopped. As one of my colleagues frequently says, the diagnostic value of this type of testing is no more than that of astrology or tea-leaf reading. If the test had any validity, which it does not, both my own experience and published scientific research has proven that anyone can be taught to beat this type of polygraph exam in a few minutes." Needless to say he was told not to speak on the topic again and the FBI has refused him from speaking about it. I didn't wanna threadjack but just found that was really interesting about polygraph testing. As for this Kerry thing...it wouldn't surprise me at all if these claims are substantiated. Remember, the media is there to debate Kerry's hair, not make investigate breakthroughs like they did with the Pentagon Papers (back when the media had balls) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted August 30, 2004 Share Posted August 30, 2004 ROTFLMAO Apu, your sig. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted August 30, 2004 Author Share Posted August 30, 2004 ROTFLMAO Apu, your sig. That is excellent. Thank god he is sticking to the debate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammerhead johnson Posted August 30, 2004 Share Posted August 30, 2004 ROTFLMAO Apu, your sig. I'd be interested to find out just how many people will find this site based on the keywords in Apu's signature. That is hilarious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox_Sonix Posted August 30, 2004 Share Posted August 30, 2004 ROTFLMAO Apu, your sig. LMAO i just thought the same thing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinnesotaSoxFan Posted August 30, 2004 Share Posted August 30, 2004 Someone is running away with the lead in the Fight of The Week Thread for SST. It might be clear about this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxman352000 Posted August 30, 2004 Share Posted August 30, 2004 Which politician hasn't accepted illegal donations. Even my guy W has on numerous occasions I'm sure Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.