Chisoxfn Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 How people deny he had weapons is popostorious to me. Heck, he's used some of the banned weapons already, yet people act as if he hasn't. they have been lobbing scuds at kuwait since this started Exactly Baggs, but wait, he doesn't have those weapons Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cwsox Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 There has been much discussion as whether these are scuds. Of course I am getting that news from BBC and not Fox. And what are the numbers of whatever has been lobbed? Are we looking at 3 or 4 or hundreds? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubKilla Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 Are we looking at 3 or 4 or hundreds? Does it matter? Saddam said he had, and according to the UN-resolution was supposed to have, 0. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 There has been much discussion as whether these are scuds. Of course I am getting that news from BBC and not Fox. And what are the numbers of whatever has been lobbed? Are we looking at 3 or 4 or hundreds? 4 of them and that is according to Fox, CNN, ABCNEWS, and many other stations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 US should stay in UN , by future power of UN may never be the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cwsox Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 Are we looking at 3 or 4 or hundreds? Does it matter? Saddam said he had, and according to the UN-resolution was supposed to have, 0. it does matter in that 3 -4 non scud missiles are hardly the teports we had of scuds raining down on Kuwait BBC has very hesitant to call them scuds, thus my wondering if they are. If they weren't scuds then the violation you cite doesn't exist. I am listening to BBC now and hope to hear more on this and will let you know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubKilla Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 Are we looking at 3 or 4 or hundreds? Does it matter? Saddam said he had, and according to the UN-resolution was supposed to have, 0. it does matter in that 3 -4 non scud missiles are hardly the teports we had of scuds raining down on Kuwait Sorry cw..... but why does it matter when Saddam is supposed to have ZERO? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.