soxfan420 Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 i will use the word f***** all i want, but please dont take offense to it because i dont mean it to offend gay's infact its perfectly fine if you are gay, just dont tell me about your storys. pls dont use the word peace it really offends me and if u use you are not the person i thought u where I will use the word f***** a lot too, for you. Why not bring that tube of KY over here and I will show you how it is used, my little piece friend. nah thats for my girls not any guys sorry go find someone else to have butt sex with Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubKilla Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 I guess it bears repeating that use of words like "gay" or "f*****" to describe something that one dislikes or hates is highyl offensive to a lot of people, including those who post here who are gay, and trust me, we have posters who are gay. Not that it is anyone's business. But no one should be bashed like that. Those are derogatory terms and I humbly again request people to not use words that are homophobic. The language is so much richer - but even if the vocabulary escapes one, just use words like "f***ed up" as it "sounds like you guys are f***ed up." It will say what you want to say and not be defaming towards people. Please. Please. This message brought to you by the poster with Eminem in his avatar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan420 Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 i was wondering the same thing he had to explain how f***** doesnt mean your gay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowerCaseRepublican Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 so are we suppose to sit back and watch him kill his own people? We didn't mind when he did it in the 1980s. And we watched lots of other dictators kill their own people and we did nothing. I really can't believe the "humanitarian" aspect when we helped Pinochet, Roberto D'Aubuisson, Hugo Banzer Suarez, etc. etc. etc. who have slaughtered more people than Saddam could have ever hoped to. Oh yeah, and how many countries condemned the gassing of the Kurds when it happened? Yeah, that's right ZERO. There are non-war ways to oust him from power. I mean we've already lost 12 troops in one helicopter accident, 7 more missing and presumed dead from two UK helicopters crashing into each other, 4 more troops dead from rocket launched grenade fire, 2 killed in a firefight, and the journalist killed in the car bomb explosion. Not to mention the deaths on the Iraqi side. And this is only the beginning of the conflict. And now we "accidentally" launched a tomahawk missile into Iran. SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, SEND THEM HOME. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowerCaseRepublican Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 And nobody give me the "I don't support the troops" BS. I support the troops a lot more than a lot of people because I want them to be safe and not to go off and be forced to fight/die in an illegal war against a country that has never harmed us. They shouldn't have to be out their risking, and for those that died, losing their lives just because Dubya (that f***ing chickenhawk) wants better approval ratings and oil fields. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan420 Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 so are we suppose to sit back and watch him kill his own people? We didn't mind when he did it in the 1980s. And we watched lots of other dictators kill their own people and we did nothing. I really can't believe the "humanitarian" aspect when we helped Pinochet, Roberto D'Aubuisson, Hugo Banzer Suarez, etc. etc. etc. who have slaughtered more people than Saddam could have ever hoped to. Oh yeah, and how many countries condemned the gassing of the Kurds when it happened? Yeah, that's right ZERO. There are non-war ways to oust him from power. I mean we've already lost 12 troops in one helicopter accident, 7 more missing and presumed dead from two UK helicopters crashing into each other, 4 more troops dead from rocket launched grenade fire, 2 killed in a firefight, and the journalist killed in the car bomb explosion. Not to mention the deaths on the Iraqi side. And this is only the beginning of the conflict. And now we "accidentally" launched a tomahawk missile into Iran. SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, SEND THEM HOME. im all ears on this no war resoultion would you mind telling me how you plan on doing this with a mad man. its not like he is in his right mind and we can compermise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan420 Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 so are we suppose to sit back and watch him kill his own people? We didn't mind when he did it in the 1980s. And we watched lots of other dictators kill their own people and we did nothing. I really can't believe the "humanitarian" aspect when we helped Pinochet, Roberto D'Aubuisson, Hugo Banzer Suarez, etc. etc. etc. who have slaughtered more people than Saddam could have ever hoped to. so because he hasnt killed has many has others that makes it ok????? so much for that peace thing huh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 you guys are saying give peace a chance, well that can never happen with suddan in power of iraqi, it seems like you guys are over looking the fact that he kills his on civilions, athletes in the olympics that dont win. or use weapons of mass destruction on his own people. How can you say we should just sit back and watch inocent people die????? Give peace a chance sounds like you guys only care about what happens to you. We tryed the none violent way by telling him to leave he didnt so now we are forcing him to leave. How is that wrong idk???? you tell me why we shouldnt help people in need??? Why couldn't the Bush regime prove the case to the international community then? Lied in UN reports Plagiarized info from 1991 and tried to make it look like it was current Did their best attempts to railroad the UN inspectors Lied about Iraqi links to Al Qaeda They have done every possible thing imaginable to get us into this war. In the Nuremburg Tribunals, the Nazis claimed that their empire was going to face "possible invasion" so that is how they justified their invasions of Poland, etc. That was deemed a "crime against peace", the worst crime to be committed because it entailed crimes against humanity and war crimes. PRE-EMPTIVE STRIKES ARE ILLEGAL! We didn't think Saddam was so evil when we sold him the weapons he used to gas the Kurds! We didn't think he was so evil when we knew he was a maniac and we armed him anyway! Arming psychopaths and these short term orgies of feel good violence are only paving the way for more members of Al Qaeda and more terrorists. FIGHTING FOR PEACE IS LIKE f***ING FOR VIRGINITY. first we have proved it and what will the un do if saddam says f*** you. not a thing. we back saddam before the first gulf war and since them, have we given them any more weapons? so lyou are taking agruements from over 20 yrs and using them now. in that region we have f*** up many times and it goes back to reagan era of backing the wrong group to neutralize a know enemy. now we have to clean up this mess. maybe we will learn from our mistakes. but we needed to take him out now. before he uses these weapon on nations who dared to do anything to him. jewish and arabs nations alike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowerCaseRepublican Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 so because he hasnt killed has many has others that makes it ok????? so much for that peace thing huh I am saying that the "humanitarian" aid mentality smacks of hypocricy. Special ops like the aforementioned "Operation Wrath of God" could do the trick. Or even better, how about letting the UN inspectors ACTUALLY DO THEIR JOB AND NOT PUT TIM LIMITS ON DIPLOMACY! Blix said he was getting compliance and destroying the few weapons they were finding. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan420 Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 because he has to big of a military to get close to him without using missles or losing 1,000's of soilders Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan420 Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 UN inspectors ACTUALLY DO THEIR JOB AND NOT PUT TIM LIMITS ON DIPLOMACY and how many times did the un inspectors get kicked out of the iraq while suddan moves his stash:( i do the same thing with my stash with my dad kick him out hide it, kick him out hide it in a different spot it goes on and on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowerCaseRepublican Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 first we have proved it and what will the un do if saddam says f*** you. not a thing. we back saddam before the first gulf war and since them, have we given them any more weapons? so lyou are taking agruements from over 20 yrs and using them now. in that region we have f*** up many times and it goes back to reagan era of backing the wrong group to neutralize a know enemy. now we have to clean up this mess. maybe we will learn from our mistakes. but we needed to take him out now. before he uses these weapon on nations who dared to do anything to him. jewish and arabs nations alike did we prove it with the 12 year old plagiarized information? did we prove it with the lying of Iraq's links to Al Qaeda? The Bush administration has lied to us a lot and been called on it. They didn't prove a case that Iraq is an immediate threat...hell, even the neighboring nations are not afraid of his ass, but for some reason "the world's only superpower" is shaking in their boots. Actually we sold them weapons as late as 1988. And private corporations continued to sell them weapons into the 90s as well. I concur that our foreign policy in the region has been piss poor. But haven't we learned that governmental overthrows in the region to install US friendly regimes always backfire as well. I will be in the elections that Iraq will pick somebody the US won't like and we'll have to go in and overthrow that guy like we did to Allende. And if we want to get technical about nations who violate the most UN resolutions....the clear cut winner is actually ISRAEL...by a longshot. Only problem is whenever the rest of the UN brings resolutions condeming Israel or wanting to crack down on them for human rights violations, etc....the US vetos the resolutions no matter what. Then again, this war in Iraq violates the UN CHARTER. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doubleM23 Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 i will use the word f***** all i want, but please dont take offense to it because i dont mean it to offend gay's infact its perfectly fine if you are gay, just dont tell me about your storys. pls dont use the word peace it really offends me and if u use you are not the person i thought u where If you have no problem with gays, then why would you use the word "f**gots" as a term of condemnation? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowerCaseRepublican Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 and how many times did the un inspectors get kicked out of the iraq while suddan moves his stash:( i do the same thing with my stash with my dad kick him out hide it, kick him out hide it in a different spot it goes on and on. Actually in 1998, the UN inspectors were demanded to leave by the UNITED NATIONS NOT IRAQ. I've talked to Ritter and Rokke, both were heads of the UN inspections teams during that time, so I know what I am talking about but thanks for playing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan420 Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 iraq has refused to let them in several times i also know what im talking about thanks for playing though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.