Goober Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 If you have it so you cant win awards if you are in the hall are we gunna get rid of the best admin award we had last year, because that would leave us to chose from Aboz, Spiff and Kap. :puke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danman31 Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 I'm saddened that cw is getting this. I disliked him before he left. I would like to know the rationale of why people are voting him over actually good posters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSteve Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 I'm saddened that cw is getting this. I disliked him before he left. I would like to know the rationale of why people are voting him over actually good posters. Naw, I liked cw alot. He is a good guy. We always had fun with the Michigan-Michigan State stuff. Always asked about wrestling and what not. He is a good guy. He deserves it too. He was an admin for the longest time, and he was one of the more active admins on the boards. I don't know if/how much he did behind the scenes, but he gets my vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubsSuck1 Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 (edited) I'm saddened that cw is getting this. I disliked him before he left. I would like to know the rationale of why people are voting him over actually good posters. Wow, that is one ignorant comment. cwsox was a well respected poster on this boards before one incident caused him to get the boot, even thoguh he left on his own will. This hall of fame thing shouldnt create bad feelings between people, and it should be an opportunity for a select few posters to be recognized. All of the posters have contributed a lot for the site, and to insinuate the Vince was a bad poster is being a jerk about the situation. This shouldn't be a competition for who was/is the "greatest poster ever", but I can see that that is what is starting to happen. edit.. And I know this has been argued to the point where threads have been locked, and I don't want to start some argument over this, but taking your shots like that isn't cool. Edited September 28, 2004 by CubsSuck1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 No reason to argue over it, it's a matter or opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Beast Posted September 29, 2004 Share Posted September 29, 2004 Ah! what is Ss2k4 doing on the ballot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Beast Posted September 29, 2004 Share Posted September 29, 2004 I'm saddened that cw is getting this. I disliked him before he left. I would like to know the rationale of why people are voting him over actually good posters. That could have been the most ignorant post I've seen in weeks. Honestly, cwsox is a great guy. He did good things while he was here, and was a friend to whoever seeked help. I owe the guy for a lot. So please don't dare say that about him. Cheap shots aren't alowed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goober Posted September 29, 2004 Share Posted September 29, 2004 This shouldn't be a competition for who was/is the "greatest poster ever", but I can see that that is what is starting to happen. we all know who would win that contest... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxin' Posted September 29, 2004 Share Posted September 29, 2004 Wow guys, lay off Danman. He's entitled to his own opinion. And Beastly, I disagree with you because Mike is still here and he has many more quality posts, I believe. But then again, I didn't read a lot of CW long posts because I simply don't have that much time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted September 29, 2004 Share Posted September 29, 2004 No reason to argue over it, it's a matter or opinion. Well that makes sense, now doesn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Beast Posted September 29, 2004 Share Posted September 29, 2004 Wow guys, lay off Danman. He's entitled to his own opinion. And Beastly, I disagree with you because Mike is still here and he has many more quality posts, I believe. But then again, I didn't read a lot of CW long posts because I simply don't have that much time. Neither do I, but you needed to get past the time, and he had some real wonderful posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted September 29, 2004 Share Posted September 29, 2004 Neither do I, but you needed to get past the time, and he had some real wonderful posts. No reason to argue over it, it's a matter or opinion. When you feel the need to argue just look at wharris's post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubsSuck1 Posted September 29, 2004 Share Posted September 29, 2004 Wow guys, lay off Danman. He's entitled to his own opinion. And Beastly, I disagree with you because Mike is still here and he has many more quality posts, I believe. But then again, I didn't read a lot of CW long posts because I simply don't have that much time. I might have been misunderstood. I don't have a problem with him having his own opinion. That's fine, but there is a fine line between opinion and insult. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiff Posted September 29, 2004 Share Posted September 29, 2004 That could have been the most ignorant post I've seen in weeks. Honestly, cwsox is a great guy. He did good things while he was here, and was a friend to whoever seeked help. I owe the guy for a lot. So please don't dare say that about him. Cheap shots aren't alowed. Calm down, skippy. Not all that glitters is gold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Beast Posted September 29, 2004 Share Posted September 29, 2004 I might have been misunderstood. I don't have a problem with him having his own opinion. That's fine, but there is a fine line between opinion and insult. Indeed. That is what I was trying to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted September 29, 2004 Share Posted September 29, 2004 I might have been misunderstood. I don't have a problem with him having his own opinion. That's fine, but there is a fine line between opinion and insult. Agree with that. However I'm having a hard time finding the insult. BTW.. from what I know it was more than "one" incident... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted September 29, 2004 Share Posted September 29, 2004 Can't we all just settle and agree that SS2k is a spammer elite? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AssHatSoxFan Posted September 29, 2004 Share Posted September 29, 2004 Can't we all just settle and agree that SS2k is a spammer elite? WAIT this isnt the spamming HOF?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubsSuck1 Posted September 29, 2004 Share Posted September 29, 2004 Agree with that. However I'm having a hard time finding the insult. BTW.. from what I know it was more than "one" incident... He said that people should instead vote for actually good posters. Meaning that cw is a bad poster? Some people might not see that as an insult, but that is how I saw it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danman31 Posted September 29, 2004 Share Posted September 29, 2004 Ok, ok settle down boys. I was merely asking for why people were voting for him. I didn't like him, and I said I was saddened that good posters were getting passed over for someone I didn't like. I wanted your reasoning for voting for him and got it. There was nothing ignorant about my post, I just wanted my question answered. Just because I don't like him doesn't mean everyone has to, that's obvious. Carry on... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted September 29, 2004 Share Posted September 29, 2004 He said that people should instead vote for actually good posters. Meaning that cw is a bad poster? Some people might not see that as an insult, but that is how I saw it. Sorry bout that. I misunderstood also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSteve Posted September 29, 2004 Share Posted September 29, 2004 Ok, ok settle down boys. I was merely asking for why people were voting for him. I didn't like him, and I said I was saddened that good posters were getting passed over for someone I didn't like. I wanted your reasoning for voting for him and got it. There was nothing ignorant about my post, I just wanted my question answered. Just because I don't like him doesn't mean everyone has to, that's obvious. Carry on... That's what I gave you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Beast Posted September 29, 2004 Share Posted September 29, 2004 That's what I gave you. :rolly :rolly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted September 29, 2004 Share Posted September 29, 2004 Can't we all just settle and agree that SS2k is a spammer elite? Did somebody say Spam? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted September 29, 2004 Author Share Posted September 29, 2004 Did somebody say Spam? Spam I am. There have been many excellent people who gave their time and talents to this site. We should be recognizing accomplishments not tearing down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts