GoodAsGould Posted October 5, 2004 Share Posted October 5, 2004 ill make this simple In his 12 wins this year, he has a 2.96 ERA, giving up an averge of 6.6 hits a game. thats why the jury is still out on garland. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted October 5, 2004 Share Posted October 5, 2004 ill make this simple In his 12 wins this year, he has a 2.96 ERA, giving up an averge of 6.6 hits a game. thats why the jury is still out on garland. Do you know his era when he does not win? That is why people do not like him. I am perfectly fine with him only if he is our 5th starter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxfan99 Posted October 5, 2004 Share Posted October 5, 2004 I'm sure most pitchers have good ERA's in the games they win. But I'm not sure why that means anything because Garland made 21 other starts and in those starts is ERA sucked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoodAsGould Posted October 5, 2004 Author Share Posted October 5, 2004 yeah most pitchers have good stats when they win.. except colon... but anyways most of them arent that good... but that stat i guess is for more the people that dont think garland is a good 4th or 5th starter.... any guy that can get 12 wins and not because of run support is a great 4 or number 5 to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.