YASNY Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 And I don't buy any of the pap about loyalty to the organization - the Sox pulled the offer off the table when he got hurt, and won't negotiate until they can examine him- how's that for loyalty. Would you rather the Sox say to Ordonez "Tough break with that career ending injury, but because of loyalty and the fact you are such a class act, we'll give you a gauranteed 5 year $70,000,000 contract." Get serious. For the good of the ballclub, they had to use caution before leaving that kind of money on the table. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLAK Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 Would you rather the Sox say to Ordonez "Tough break with that career ending injury, but because of loyalty and the fact you are such a class act, we'll give you a gauranteed 5 year $70,000,000 contract." Get serious. For the good of the ballclub, they had to use caution before leaving that kind of money on the table. In no way are the Sox wrong for pulling the offer when it became questionable whether he could play. And there is no way Magg's should have signed the old offer, 'very, very fair' or not, without at least testing it against bids from other teams. Heck, I can't buy cardboard boxes for the shop without cross quoting, why is baseball different? My issue is with folks who are defaming Ordonez' character. It seems it's OK for the Sox to pull back from a player after 13 years with the organization 'for the good of the club', but if that player enters the free agent market he is disloyal, greedy and selfish? Folks are trying to have this both ways. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 In no way are the Sox wrong for pulling the offer when it became questionable whether he could play. And there is no way Magg's should have signed the old offer, 'very, very fair' or not, without at least testing it against bids from other teams. Heck, I can't buy cardboard boxes for the shop without cross quoting, why is baseball different? My issue is with folks who are defaming Ordonez' character. It seems it's OK for the Sox to pull back from a player after 13 years with the organization 'for the good of the club', but if that player enters the free agent market he is disloyal, greedy and selfish? Folks are trying to have this both ways. The way you used "for the good of the club" in quotes implies that I have been bashing Magglio and that is not the case. When I have felt the Sox were being bashed unfairly here, I may have said ... they did this because Maggs said that .. or something. I wish Magglio nothing but success. ...... Unless he goes to the Cubs, Yankees, Red Sox, Twins, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 In no way are the Sox wrong for pulling the offer when it became questionable whether he could play. And there is no way Magg's should have signed the old offer, 'very, very fair' or not, without at least testing it against bids from other teams. Heck, I can't buy cardboard boxes for the shop without cross quoting, why is baseball different? My issue is with folks who are defaming Ordonez' character. It seems it's OK for the Sox to pull back from a player after 13 years with the organization 'for the good of the club', but if that player enters the free agent market he is disloyal, greedy and selfish? Folks are trying to have this both ways. I could care less if Maggs would have left the Sox like any other free agent had. But when he started lying to the fans and to the organization, the gloves came off. When he flat out called KW and the organization liars, when he was indeed lying through his teeth burns me. He deserves to be called on it, and he will. He is the same smile for the cameras and tell the fans what they want to hear liar as the other right fielder in Chicago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsox Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 The thing is, he was offered Vlad money, 5 yr 70 mill. Well, its not quite Vlad money, but its pretty damn close. 14 mill per season. That's the one thing I don't understand about Maggs' position in all this....He says he wants Vlad $$$ but doesn't he realize he's not even close to being a Vlad type player?!? Vlad's an All Star, MVP, superstar player....Maggs is a rock solid player but worthy of Vlad $$$?!? I don't think so! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackie hayes Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 That's the one thing I don't understand about Maggs' position in all this....He says he wants Vlad $$$ but doesn't he realize he's not even close to being a Vlad type player?!? Vlad's an All Star, MVP, superstar player....Maggs is a rock solid player but worthy of Vlad $$$?!? I don't think so! IMO he's just posturing, I'm sure he realizes that he's not Vlad-good. Before his injury he could always say that, even if his numbers weren't as good, he was less risky b/c of Vlad's back, and that made him just as valuable. I'm not arguing that position myself, I'm just saying, there are ways it could be 'justified'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Hudler Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 When he flat out called KW and the organization liars, when he was indeed lying through his teeth burns me. He deserves to be called on it, and he will. He is the same smile for the cameras and tell the fans what they want to hear liar as the other right fielder in Chicago. STILL waiting for someone to find the comments Maggs made to start this. I know about the surgery in Austria and his appaent unavailability to the Sox, but what has he said to deserve this venomous response? Anyone? Buehler? Anyone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Hudler Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 It wasn't really a proper quote in the article. Here is what it read after KW's comments: "GM Ken Williams on the news that OF Magglio Ordonez said back in June he felt the organization was taking him for granted." I remember Magg's saying that, or something to that effect, before he got hurt, but I wonder if KW, in October, was aware that Magg's said it in June. I'd sure as heck like to see the comments he made..... or at least learn in what context they were made. Geez, this could be all about NOTHING. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AddisonStSox Posted October 28, 2004 Author Share Posted October 28, 2004 I'd sure as heck like to see the comments he made..... or at least learn in what context they were made. Geez, this could be all about NOTHING. What's stopping you from looking? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLAK Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 I'd sure as heck like to see the comments he made..... or at least learn in what context they were made. Geez, this could be all about NOTHING. Here is article CBS Sportline lifted for their report. Cowley went on to include the KW remark that started this thread. By Joe Cowley Staff writer -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In an interview with the Daily Southtown in June, during which Magglio Ordonez discussed his pending free agency, the four-time All-Star said the last thing he wanted to do was "look like the bad guy in all of this." "This organization has taken me for granted," Ordonez said then. "They're going to try to make me look like the bad guy in all of this. I won't let them." Like I said above, if KW was led to believe that this was recent then he I can see him getting upset. In any case, the is more NOTHING than something here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.