Chisoxfn Posted October 29, 2004 Share Posted October 29, 2004 While I think were all aware of Millwoods slide since the 2nd half of the 2003 season, you can't help but look past some of the good numbers he's put up. And it appears that part of the reason for his down-turn were health related (elbow problems). Now he would have to take a substantial pay-cut and potentially a shorter term deal (its unclear whether he would do that) but at the right price he would be a good option for the White Sox. You can't look past his career numbers: 98-64, 3.89 ERA, 1367.1 INN, 1283 H (1.24 WHIP), 1134 K (7.46 K/9). He has also done a relatively good job limiting the long ball in his career. Assuming he checks out physically, he's definately an option worth looking at, especially if teams look past him in the early part of free agency. Plus he's just 29 years old. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted October 29, 2004 Share Posted October 29, 2004 Rather Odalis Perez or one of the other FA pitchers out there. I don't think it was any coincidence he started struggling after he was moved out of Atlanta, and began pitching in a hitters park (Citizens Bell). Unless he comes cheaply, I think we should look elsewhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted October 29, 2004 Share Posted October 29, 2004 The philles park is nearly as bad as ours. So expect similar numbers if not alittle worse. I don't really think it is a coincidence that his numbers have increased since not being around mazzone. Mazzone is incredible. Turned hampton back into his old form, wright into a stud, and who honestly though thomson would ever have an era under 4? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoodAsGould Posted October 29, 2004 Share Posted October 29, 2004 if you watched thomson's 2nd half on the rangers last year i think a lot of people might have Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted October 29, 2004 Author Share Posted October 29, 2004 if you watched thomson's 2nd half on the rangers last year i think a lot of people might have Ya, I also remember him really showing his stuff in a performance or two against the Sox during that 2nd half. He had great command of all his pitches and looked healthy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punch and Judy Garland Posted October 29, 2004 Share Posted October 29, 2004 thomson mgith have been forseeable but most people though Hampton and Wright were lost causes. Mazzone is incredible and I want no part of Millwood. Would he come on the cheap? Isn't Boras his agent? I just don't trust Kevin Millwood. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Critic Posted October 29, 2004 Share Posted October 29, 2004 Steve Carlton had pretty good career numbers when the Sox picked him up, too.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmmmmbeeer Posted October 29, 2004 Share Posted October 29, 2004 another Boras client. I wouldn't expect a paycut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sox-r-us Posted October 29, 2004 Share Posted October 29, 2004 What is all this love for Odalis-freaking_perez I just do not get? Ever since we heard we may be looking at paulie for Perez last year, everyone seems to be in love with this clown Did any of you see him get hammered in the playoffs? Why is this guy even on our radar? He is worse than Garland... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted October 29, 2004 Share Posted October 29, 2004 another Boras client. Bingo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punch and Judy Garland Posted October 29, 2004 Share Posted October 29, 2004 I wouldn't judge Odalis on only two starts. Black Jack got rocked twice in the 93 playoffs, it happens to good pitchers. He;s a guy who doesn't walk anybody and is still very young. I would be very excited about adding an arm as good as his. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted October 29, 2004 Share Posted October 29, 2004 What is all this love for Odalis-freaking_perez I just do not get? Ever since we heard we may be looking at paulie for Perez last year, everyone seems to be in love with this clown Did any of you see him get hammered in the playoffs? Why is this guy even on our radar? He is worse than Garland... Good control, good GO-AO ratio, good amount of K's, good ERA...the only real negatives are that he didn't throw a lot of innings in the second half and that he'd be going from a real good pitcher's park in the NL to a good hitter's park in the AL. A good thing for us is that he is not known well by many people, and his wins were down last year, and a lot of people look at wins as a good barometer of success(when a lot of times, it isn't). If we could not get an absolute stud like Unit, then Perez is a nice option. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Honda Civic Posted October 29, 2004 Share Posted October 29, 2004 What is all this love for Odalis-freaking_perez I just do not get? Ever since we heard we may be looking at paulie for Perez last year, everyone seems to be in love with this clown Did any of you see him get hammered in the playoffs? Why is this guy even on our radar? He is worse than Garland... Did you see Rolen go 0-for-the-World-Series? He's worse than Crede. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted October 30, 2004 Share Posted October 30, 2004 What is all this love for Odalis-freaking_perez I just do not get? Ever since we heard we may be looking at paulie for Perez last year, everyone seems to be in love with this clown Did any of you see him get hammered in the playoffs? Why is this guy even on our radar? He is worse than Garland... Odalis Perez - 7-6 3.25 ERA Jon Garland - 12-11 4.93 ERA One thing that worries me about Perez though is that he gave up 26 HR's this season in 31 appearances. That number would definitely rise if he pitched at the Cell. FWIW Garland gave up 34. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.