YASNY Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 He had an excellent year for St. Louis. I just don't see him doing it again. See .... that's the hard part about being a GM. If you can't see into the future, you suck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesox91403 Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 See .... that's the hard part about being a GM. If you can't see into the future, you suck. Absolutely agree. Here are Womack's numbers: http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/stats?statsId=5158 This was his first season batting over.300 Also, can anyone tell me what is considered a good on base % Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 Absolutely agree. Here are Womack's numbers: http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/stats?statsId=5158 This was his first season batting over.300 Also, can anyone tell me what is considered a good on base % Barry Bonds had a good OBP. Joe Borchard did not. I hope that helps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesox91403 Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 Barry Bonds had a good OBP. Joe Borchard did not. I hope that helps. Yes, i think I can go from there, Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 Absolutely agree. Here are Womack's numbers: http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/stats?statsId=5158 This was his first season batting over.300 Also, can anyone tell me what is considered a good on base % Good obp is .350 and above. .400 and above obp is just excellent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 They say if you cannot steal 75% safely you might as well not steal at all. He said on-base percentage, not sb percentage, dumbass. Anyways, for a leadoff hitter, .350's usually about as low as I want to go. I'd prefer somewhere around .380, or even more, but I'd like .350 atleast. Anywhere in the .400 territory is usually considered pretty good, and anything of .450 or more is considered very good. Then consider that Barry Bonds had a .609 OBP or so...you realize how insane his season was. That basically means he was on 61% of the time...which is sick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 He said on-base percentage, not sb percentage, dumbass. Anyways, for a leadoff hitter, .350's usually about as low as I want to go. I'd prefer somewhere around .380, or even more, but I'd like .350 atleast. Anywhere in the .400 territory is usually considered pretty good, and anything of .450 or more is considered very good. Then consider that Barry Bonds had a .609 OBP or so...you realize how insane his season was. That basically means he was on 61% of the time...which is sick. Lol, i fixed it before you posted this so ha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 See .... that's the hard part about being a GM. If you can't see into the future, you suck. And if you can't jump to the past with your 20-20 hindsite vision and fix things, you also suck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quickman Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 Buddy our number 5 positon sucked for how many yrs. Look at the number. Kenny and ozzie are sick of that crap. Go for good starting pitching its time to get number 5 guy settled and get wins. No more losing games cause of it amen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.