Rowand44 Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 Hinrich Redd Deng ______ Ilgauskas You're pretty optimistic when it comes to the bulls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 You're pretty optimistic when it comes to the bulls. You cant deny the fact that we could sign two guys to huge deals if we dumped AD for Robinson. That would leave 30 million in cap room. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 You cant deny the fact that we could sign two guys to huge deals if we dumped AD for Robinson. That would leave 30 million in cap room. No doubt, they could but would they?? Anyways the only reason I said that is because you seem to be pretty pessimistic when it comes to the sox. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 No doubt, they could but would they?? Anyways the only reason I said that is because you seem to be pretty pessimistic when it comes to the sox. No way am I optimistic about the Bulls. They won't win 20 games this year, I just needed a f***ing awesome dream. Actually, I'm one of the most pessimistic people ever, about anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 No way am I optimistic about the Bulls. They won't win 20 games this year, I just needed a f***ing awesome dream. Actually, I'm one of the most pessimistic people ever, about anything. Understood, we all need dreams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chisox05 Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 Paxson will get Redd or Allen. We do have a descent team if u look at us on paper. C-Curry PF-Chandler SF-Deng/Nocioni SG-Allen PG-Hinrich Thats a pretty good f***ing team imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 Imo, the Bulls have a bigger need in the low post. The guard/small forward situation is going to be just fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 Great deal for us, I wonder why the Sixers would do this? And as far as free agents go, I have a hard time believing any impact free agent would want to come here anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 Great deal for us, I wonder why the Sixers would do this? And as far as free agents go, I have a hard time believing any impact free agent would want to come here anyway. He is sitting on the bench for them, they want nothing to do with him. He will remain on the bench until he is traded Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mksoxfan Posted December 6, 2004 Author Share Posted December 6, 2004 i agree, the 7ers r looking to trade him. at least we got a guy in davis that makes the same amount of money as robinson and davis might be able to help out iverson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 espn insider has a rumor the Bulls trade Curry to Golden State, Dunleavy goes to the Clippers to play for his dad, and the Bulls get Chris Wilcox and Bobby Simmons. They said Golden State was doing background checks on Curry at the present time. I have no idea why the Clippers would do this, both Wilcox and Simmons are better than Dunleavy, but they ARE the Clippers. Paxson, I'm sure would make this trade in a heartbeat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xero Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 espn insider has a rumor the Bulls trade Curry to Golden State, Dunleavy goes to the Clippers to play for his dad, and the Bulls get Chris Wilcox and Bobby Simmons. They said Golden State was doing background checks on Curry at the present time. I have no idea why the Clippers would do this, both Wilcox and Simmons are better than Dunleavy, but they ARE the Clippers. Paxson, I'm sure would make this trade in a heartbeat. I'd rather do the Curry-Sweetny (sp?) trade... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 I'd rather do the Curry-Sweetny (sp?) trade... Sweetney would be nice to have, but Wilcox is better than Curry, and Simmons is having a breakout season. Either trade would help the Bulls, getting rid of the dog named Curry would be a step in the right direction, but they won't be serious contenders until they acquire one of the top 10 players in the league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Beast Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 I'd really like to keep Davis, I don't like Robinson at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSteve Posted December 7, 2004 Share Posted December 7, 2004 I'd really like to keep Davis, I don't like Robinson at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.