shagar69 Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 can anybody at least summarize the article, thanx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 Bulls get: Bobby Simmons and Chris Wilcox Clippers get: Mike Dunleavy, Jr. Warriors get: Eddy Curry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palehosefan Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 The one I read had the Bulls giving up Curry to Golden State I believe it was, GS sending Mike Dunleavy to his dad(The Clippers) and the Clippers sending Wilcox to the Bulls. The Dybber beat me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shagar69 Posted December 6, 2004 Author Share Posted December 6, 2004 Bulls get: Bobby Simmons and Chris Wilcox Clippers get: Mike Dunleavy, Jr. Warriors get: Eddy Curry wow, i would do it in a heartbeat. if we got ONLY bobby simmons i would do it. BTW is this just a suggestion by Ford, or an actual deal that has a chance of happening Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted December 7, 2004 Share Posted December 7, 2004 wow, i would do it in a heartbeat. if we got ONLY bobby simmons i would do it. BTW is this just a suggestion by Ford, or an actual deal that has a chance of happening It says "a source in Chicago." Basically, it says the Warriors are looking at Curry. wondering if Dunleavy, Sr. is overrating Dunleavy, Jr. and the Bulls would be better if they had Wilcox at the 4 and Chandler at the 5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted December 7, 2004 Share Posted December 7, 2004 wow, i would do it in a heartbeat. if we got ONLY bobby simmons i would do it. BTW is this just a suggestion by Ford, or an actual deal that has a chance of happening It actually has been talked about supposedly. They said the Warriors are in the process of doing background checks on Curry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xero Posted December 7, 2004 Share Posted December 7, 2004 www.bugmenot.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shagar69 Posted December 7, 2004 Author Share Posted December 7, 2004 www.bugmenot.com dude, that doesnt work. u cant use it for insider Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted December 7, 2004 Share Posted December 7, 2004 Clippers would be gettign extremely raped in that deal. Makes not much sense at all why they would do it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish Posted December 7, 2004 Share Posted December 7, 2004 Clippers would be gettign extremely raped in that deal. Makes not much sense at all why they would do it. Daddy wants his baby boy. That is all that deal is about for the Clippers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZoomSlowik Posted December 7, 2004 Share Posted December 7, 2004 I really don't see how that deal makes sense for the Clippers. Simmons has outplayed Dunleavy so far this year. They are the same age and I would assume Dunleavy makes more money due to his draft position. And then they'd throw in Wilcox too? If the Bulls can get this deal, I think It'd be pretty stupid to pass on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
black jack Posted December 7, 2004 Share Posted December 7, 2004 wilcox is a stud. simmons makes this deal an absolute no brainer. i'd give up curry for wilcox straight up. i like the thought of tyson in the middle. he's got the energy to get 12 boards a night and alter a few shots. play a Camby role for us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFanForever Posted December 7, 2004 Share Posted December 7, 2004 wilcox is a stud. simmons makes this deal an absolute no brainer. i'd give up curry for wilcox straight up. i like the thought of tyson in the middle. he's got the energy to get 12 boards a night and alter a few shots. play a Camby role for us. He got another Double Double tonight while Curry didn't do s***. I think Chandler might finally be getting it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted December 7, 2004 Share Posted December 7, 2004 Wow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted December 7, 2004 Share Posted December 7, 2004 I really don't see how that deal makes sense for the Clippers. Simmons has outplayed Dunleavy so far this year. They are the same age and I would assume Dunleavy makes more money due to his draft position. And then they'd throw in Wilcox too? If the Bulls can get this deal, I think It'd be pretty stupid to pass on it. It doesn't. Simmons has been outplaying Dunleavy. The only explaination is it is the Clippers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
black jack Posted December 7, 2004 Share Posted December 7, 2004 PLEASE LET THIS HAPPEN!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted December 7, 2004 Share Posted December 7, 2004 It doesn't. Simmons has been outplaying Dunleavy. The only explaination is it is the Clippers. Like father, like son I suppose. The Warriors really want a high post center, who can pass the ball around, whether Curry is that guy I don't know, but Adonal Foyle certainly ain't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted December 7, 2004 Share Posted December 7, 2004 The latest Eddy Curry trade rumor lived a short life Monday before Los Angeles Clippers general manager Elgin Baylor shot it down. Baylor was dumbfounded by the idea of a three-way deal that had the Bulls sending Curry to Golden State, the Warriors sending small forward Mike Dunleavy to the Clippers and the Clippers sending forward-center Chris Wilcox and forward Bobby Simmons to the Bulls. "I would be crazy to do something like that,'' Baylor said. "Those two guys are having career seasons, and our team is off to a great start, our best in years. Why would I want to mess up a chemistry by giving away two very good players for one? Some of these rumors are downright crazy and really can't be done for salary-cap reasons.'' End of that rumor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 7, 2004 Share Posted December 7, 2004 End of that rumor. Damn, I was all excited too. That would have been the steal of the century for Lazy Eddy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted December 7, 2004 Share Posted December 7, 2004 Damn, I was all excited too. That would have been the steal of the century for Lazy Eddy. If something sounds too good to be true ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.