SoxFan562004 Posted December 17, 2004 Share Posted December 17, 2004 it's going to be great when KW gets a question in spring about the Sox not making huge signings and he lists Hermanson, Dye, AND this signing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted December 17, 2004 Share Posted December 17, 2004 Juan Uribe IS NOT Miguel Tejada. Tejada was a highly regarded prospect with a proven minor league track record. Tejada's success was expected. Uribe is nearly the exact opposite. He was average at best in the minors, and has just began to develop. Uribe has shown some promise and finally had one good year. Tejada's path to success has been long and predictable. There is no guarantee Juan's level of success will continue to climb. I am not saying it won't, but there can no accurate correlations made between Juan Uribe and Miguel Tejada. I guess we'll find out this coming season where he's truly going. One thing is for certain and that he's a defenite upgrade over Jose Valentin and he's coming at roughly half the price. Solid, SOLID move by KW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted December 17, 2004 Share Posted December 17, 2004 Pretty sure Rotoworld said it was a $5 million option for 2008, so I don't know who's wrong here. I am sure rotoworld is right because his option would not jump to nearly double his 2007 salary. Also they got it from the sun times. http://www.suntimes.com/output/sports/cst-spt-sox16.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted December 17, 2004 Share Posted December 17, 2004 I really like this deal. There is no doubt in my mind he would have made more than this in arbitration in the next three years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Hudler Posted December 17, 2004 Share Posted December 17, 2004 I beg to differ. If you look statistically, there seems to be a very close correlation between the two: 1998 Miguel Tejada (22) 2003 Juan Uribe (23) AB 365 316 BA .233 .253 OBP .298 .257 2B 20 19 HR 11 10 SLG .384 .427 BB 28 17 K 86 60 1999 Miguel Tejada (23) 2004 Juan Uribe (24) AB 593 502 BA .251 .283 OBP .325 .327 2B 33 21 HR 21 23 SLG .427 .506 BB 57 32 K 94 96 2000 Miguel Tejada (24) 2005 Juan Uribe (25) AB 607 ????? BA .275 ????? OBP .349 ????? 2B 32 ????? HR 30 ????? SLG .479 ????? BB 66 ????? K 102 ????? Sure Uribe's strike zone issues are a little more pronounced than Tejada's but offensively they are following the same path. Tejeda just was more hyped and got a quicker start. If you dont pay attention to stats, I'm probably not going to win you over, but it doesnt hurt that they're both about 5'10" and 175 pounds and hail from the same town in the Dominican Republic (that last fact is irrelevant, but interesting anyways). The jump from where Uribe is now to where Tejada was in 2000 is not a very big one and I think Uribe can make that jump offensively. He already is very good defensively (not unlike Tejada). I think I've made a fair case for an "accurate correlation," whether you agree with it or not. The thing you missed on is you picked Uribe's 2nd and 3rd seasons (arguably 3rd and 4th if you count the 72 games Uribe played in 2001) to compare with Tejada's 1st and 2nd. You left out 2002 when Juan played 155 games. In total, Uribe had played a combined 448 games in the Majors while Tejada had only played 288, based on the years in your example. I do very much pay attention to numbers. Here are some numbers I pay attention to in this comparison: CAREER BATTING RECORD - Juan Uribe YR Club LG CLASS POS AVG G AB R H TB 2B 3B HR RBI SH SF HB BB IB SO SB CS GDP SLUG OBP TPA 97 Rockies DSL R SS .269 65 234 32 63 75 12 0 0 29 3 3 2 31 0 22 7 6 0 .321 *** 273 98 Rockies ARI R SS .277 40 148 25 41 52 5 3 0 17 3 2 3 12 0 25 8 1 0 .351 *** 168 99 Asheville SAL A SS .267 125 430 57 115 176 28 3 9 46 11 4 6 20 0 79 11 7 0 .409 *** 471 00 Salem CAR A SS .256 134 485 64 124 199 22 7 13 65 4 2 4 38 0 100 22 5 0 .410 *** 533 01 Carolina SOU AA SS .231 3 13 1 3 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 .308 *** 13 Colorado SprPCL AAA SS .310 74 281 40 87 149 27 7 7 48 0 2 2 12 1 43 11 8 0 .530 *** 297 CAREER BATTING RECORD - Miguel Tejada YR Club LG CLASS POS AVG G AB R H TB 2B 3B HR RBI SH SF HB BB IB SO SB CS GDP SLUG OBP TPA 94 Oakland DSL R 2B .294 74 218 51 64 129 9 1 18 62 0 5 0 37 3 36 13 5 0 .592 *** 260 95 Southern OreNWS A SS .245 74 269 45 66 115 15 5 8 44 0 3 2 41 2 54 19 2 0 .428 *** 315 96 Modesto CAL A SS .279 114 458 97 128 210 12 5 20 72 1 7 4 51 3 93 27 16 0 .459 *** 521 97 Huntsville SOU AA SS .275 128 502 85 138 230 20 3 22 97 1 8 7 50 0 99 15 11 0 .458 *** 568 Oakland AL MAJ SS .202 26 99 10 20 33 3 2 2 10 0 0 3 2 0 22 2 0 0 .333 *** 104 98 Edmonton PCL AAA SS .000 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 .000 *** 4 Huntsville SOU AA SS .327 15 52 9 17 29 6 0 2 7 1 2 0 4 0 8 1 0 0 .558 *** 59 Like I said, Tejada's track record was proven and his success was expected. There is no way, before this season you could say the same for Juan Uribe. The guy had a good year. That's a good thing. But I'll wait until I see two in a row before I annoint him in category comparable with an MVP Award winner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted December 17, 2004 Share Posted December 17, 2004 Did anyone know Uribe dumped Scott Boras in place of Marte's agent? Looks as if the White Sox stance on negotiating with Scott Boras influenced this decision. Perhaps Uribe was doing his part to ensuring his place on this team for a long time. Meanwhile, negotiations were said to have been a breeze on the three-year, $9.75 million deal that shortstop Juan Uribe agreed to Wednesday. One reason could be that Uribe left agent Scott Boras last month and switched to Martin Arburua, also Marte's agent. http://www.suntimes.com/output/baseball/cst-spt-randy17.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted December 17, 2004 Share Posted December 17, 2004 Did anyone know Uribe dumped Scott Boras in place of Marte's agent? Looks as if the White Sox stance on negotiating with Scott Boras influenced this decision. Perhaps Uribe was doing his part to ensuring his place on this team for a long time. http://www.suntimes.com/output/baseball/cst-spt-randy17.html Yeah I saw that on the Southtown too, I knew a multiyear contract negotiated with Scott Bora$$ was too good to be true. Also saw this in the same article I read; The Sox are still hoping to reach multiyear deals with outfielders Aaron Rowand and Timo Perez, both of whom are arbitration-eligible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 17, 2004 Share Posted December 17, 2004 Did anyone know Uribe dumped Scott Boras in place of Marte's agent? Looks as if the White Sox stance on negotiating with Scott Boras influenced this decision. Perhaps Uribe was doing his part to ensuring his place on this team for a long time. http://www.suntimes.com/output/baseball/cst-spt-randy17.html Now it all makes sense. So what is the under/over on Joe Crede getting traded or getting a new agent? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greasywheels121 Posted December 17, 2004 Share Posted December 17, 2004 Did anyone know Uribe dumped Scott Boras in place of Marte's agent? Looks as if the White Sox stance on negotiating with Scott Boras influenced this decision. Perhaps Uribe was doing his part to ensuring his place on this team for a long time. http://www.suntimes.com/output/baseball/cst-spt-randy17.html That's pretty cool to see. Props for Uribe changing agents to say he really wanted to be here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted December 17, 2004 Author Share Posted December 17, 2004 Does no one else question a multiyear deal for Timo? I figured he'd be non-tendered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MRKARNO Posted December 17, 2004 Share Posted December 17, 2004 Like I said, Tejada's track record was proven and his success was expected. There is no way, before this season you could say the same for Juan Uribe. The guy had a good year. That's a good thing. But I'll wait until I see two in a row before I annoint him in category comparable with an MVP Award winner. Fair enough. I'm just saying that there is statistical evidence to suggest that it's possible. Uribe is 2 years behind Tejada was, but I dont see why it cant just be that it suddenly just "clicked" for him a little later than it did Tejada. Hype doesnt always equal results. Ask Joe Borchard about that one, but just because one of two similar players are hyped, that doesnt mean that they arent similar. I buy your arguement about Uribe being less likely to approach that level than Tejada himself, but I'm just trying to show everyone what we may have on our hands here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santo=dorf Posted December 17, 2004 Share Posted December 17, 2004 Does no one else question a multiyear deal for Timo? I figured he'd be non-tendered. I was think the same thing too. Multi-year? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Hudler Posted December 17, 2004 Share Posted December 17, 2004 Fair enough. I'm just saying that there is statistical evidence to suggest that it's possible. Uribe is 2 years behind Tejada was, but I dont see why it cant just be that it suddenly just "clicked" for him a little later than it did Tejada. Hype doesnt always equal results. Ask Joe Borchard about that one, but just because one of two similar players are hyped, that doesnt mean that they arent similar. I buy your arguement about Uribe being less likely to approach that level than Tejada himself, but I'm just trying to show everyone what we may have on our hands here. I said all along that Uribe COULD continue on an upward trend. I just want to see him do it another year before I start buying into it and making such lofty comparisons. It's simple. Until he does it again, he is Pokey Reese. If he has another good year, then he proves himself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Hudler Posted December 17, 2004 Share Posted December 17, 2004 Does no one else question a multiyear deal for Timo? I figured he'd be non-tendered. Ditto....... My guess is that is an erroneous report somehow. If they give Timo a multi-year deal, then KW is dumber than...... well, fill in your own blank. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.