Jump to content

A.J. Pierzynski


AddisonStSox

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 155
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

BTW, isn't Davis Garcia's personal catcher?

He did most of the catching of Garcia, but Burke took over as Buehrle's personal catcher. Burke has caught Garcia on a few occasions though. If piersinski is gonna sign with the Sox, it mark the disappearence of Ben Davis. This would have to happen soon, the sox would have to non-tender Davis. Burke is not going anywhere, he'll catch buehrle every fifth day, and would fill in whenever Pierz needed a breather.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure you know him personally.

I know someone that is very, very good friends with A.J., and he tells me how A.J. isn't as much of an ass as people make him out to be, but he's not exactly the nicest guy in the world. The story I heard was that he was real nice up until he made the majors, and then he changed into another person. However, my source told me that A.J. is still a solid guy though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will Burke hit better?

 

I could hit better than Davis. That's why he's a backup.

 

Offense Defense. Somebody said Burke was good at throwing people out. I'd LOVE to see that argument backed up. It was an adventure just for him to catch the ball.

 

I don't hate Burke, he is what he is. AAA fodder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will Burke hit better?

 

I could hit better than Davis. That's why he's a backup.

 

Offense Defense. Somebody said Burke was good at throwing people out. I'd LOVE to see that argument backed up. It was an adventure just for him to catch the ball.

 

I don't hate Burke, he is what he is.  AAA fodder.

He threw out 42% last year. Your boy davis threw out 29%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

some numbers -- SB% -- (I'm to lazy to go back a page to quote it)

Burke was the personal catcher for Buehrle, that increased his number significantly.

 

That being said, there is nothing I saw last season from Davis that indicated that he was a good defensive catcher. His handling of Cotts in that one game where he had 4 "wild pitches" was absolutely pitiful.

 

Burke can't hang on to a ball on a play at the plate though -- it's not like either of these guys are anywhere near good defensively.

 

I think, if you're looking at AJ, you have to ask yourself which player is a better fit for the team.

 

Burke

- Should hit for a higher average than Davis

- cheaper than davis

- poor defense

- MB's personal catcher

 

Davis

- Prolonged slumps

- more power

- more expensive

- poor defense

 

It's clear, to me anyways, that should we sign AJ, Davis should be shown the door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

some numbers -- SB% -- (I'm to lazy to go back a page to quote it)

Burke was the personal catcher for Buehrle, that increased his number significantly.

 

That being said, there is nothing I saw last season from Davis that indicated that he was a good defensive catcher. His handling of Cotts in that one game where he had 4 "wild pitches" was absolutely pitiful.

 

Burke can't hang on to a ball on a play at the plate though -- it's not like either of these guys are anywhere near good defensively.

 

I think, if you're looking at AJ, you have to ask yourself which player is a better fit for the team.

 

Burke

- Should hit for a higher average than Davis

- cheaper than davis

- poor defense

- MB's personal catcher

 

Davis

- Prolonged slumps

- more power

- more expensive

- poor defense

 

It's clear, to me anyways, that should we sign AJ, Davis should be shown the door.

I agree 100%. I don't expect great things out of burke but he is a little bit better in my mind and is gonna be nearly a million cheaper. It is a no brainer in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He threw out 42% last year. Your boy davis threw out 29%.

My boy Davis, prior to last year, threw out 36% in 2001, 44% in 2002, and 35% in 2003.

 

Burke? 0%

 

Fielding Pct: Davis is around .995 for career. Burke? .987

 

I can live with Burke, but it doesn't mean I want to. Pierzynski is leaps and bounds better than both, and Davis is better than Burke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So because he got ran over keep him instead of davis

 

Yes. It's not fair to him. It's not his fault. But the Sox need a new attitude. I'm still a little pissed about how that whole thing went down. I blame Ozzie and MJ ect. But, I'd be willing to bet some of his teammates see Burke as a symbol of a failed season. I'd rather have Davis and AJ.

 

Maybe I'm wrong and Burke will be the rally cry. Like remember the Alamo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My boy Davis, prior to last year, threw out 36% in 2001, 44% in 2002, and 35% in 2003.

 

Burke? 0%

 

Fielding Pct: Davis is around .995 for career. Burke? .987

 

I can live with Burke, but it doesn't mean I want to. Pierzynski is leaps and bounds better than both, and Davis is better than Burke.

Five passed balls for davis, one for burke. For a difference of nearly one million dollars, which can help alot more than some people realize, i would go with burke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fielding Pct: Davis is around .995 for career. Burke? .987

 

I can live with Burke, but it doesn't mean I want to. Pierzynski is leaps and bounds better than both, and Davis is better than Burke.

Pierz is widely regarded as a BAD defensive catcher -- He threw out a whopping 15% last season

 

And Davis must have friend in the official scorer's box. Seriously in that one game where Cotts was credited with 4 WP, 1 flew to the backstop, but the other 3 were PB's no doubt. Fielding percentage? :huh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...