southsider2k5 Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 I agree qwerty, it should have been at least 150. But overall, I love the addition. He has won a World Series before and could help Jon with theat winning mentality and he is good friends with Contreras maybe they will light fires under each others asses to inspire them to work that much harder. If you really take a second to think about, 4 million a year to possibly improve Jon and Jose, plus his stuff, it's a deal. Good point. Miller has had serious injury problems, and is going to get paid more money than Hernandez. And Hernandez has pitched in many big games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 Next year Pauly comes off the books and so does jon. Garland is a free agent at the end of the 2006 season unless they get a new deal worked out. So he will be here two more years unless traded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 Ya I can see it now. Sox refuse to sign Konerko because they are paying El Duque who may never pitch again 4 million a year. This is after Konerko has another .275-.285 35 HR, 100 RBI season. I'll just hope to hell he helps them get the series this year cause I don't like giving him anything guaranteed next year. Maybe have the 2nd year of the contract kick in if he pitches 100 innings this year. Either way too much guaranteed money if this whitesox.com article is correct. Ha....I hope not, that's not what I meant. I'm just saying I think we'll have money to work with. I don't think it's to much when the Lieber's, Wright's, Clement's are getting 7 plus and in the case of Matt 8 plus, when el duque is arguably better then these guys and some of them have injury risks also. I think we'll just have to agree to disagree on this one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 Garland is a free agent at the end of the 2006 season unless they get a new deal worked out. So he will be here two mor years unless traded. Ah...my bad, for some reason I thought he was after this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 Garland is a free agent at the end of the 2006 season unless they get a new deal worked out. So he will be here two mor years unless traded. didn't he just sign a 1 year/$3.4 mil contract for next year? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lvjeremylv Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 Hey. I've tried to have an intelligent conversation with you. But apparently, you aren't capable. So be it. Merry Christmas. :headshake After someone compares a mental midget to 3 stud HOF pitchers who were huge parts of winning a World Series, it's kind of hard to have an intelligent conversation with them. Sorry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 didn't he just sign a 1 year/$3.4 mil contract for next year? That is for 2005. He'll probably get around 5-6 mil for 2006 with the way the market is looking... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 didn't he just sign a 1 year/$3.4 mil contract for next year? They have his rights for 2006 also. They signed him to that deal to avoid arbitration this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lvjeremylv Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 didn't he just sign a 1 year/$3.4 mil contract for next year? Yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 They have his rights for 2006 also. They signed him to that deal to avoid arbitration. sorry, my bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 After someone compares a mental midget to 3 stud HOF pitchers who were huge parts of winning a World Series, it's kind of hard to have an intelligent conversation with them. Sorry. I don't think he's saying Garland is quite the pitcher that these guys have been, however he's saying if you compare stats through a certain point of their careers that they're very comparable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUGGERNAUT Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 It's the base I have problems with. Who do we trust? The Cubune or the Miami Herald? The Cubune: the Sox offered a two-year heavily laden with incentives, worth as much as $4 million. The Herald: http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/sports/10472238.htm?1c ''El Duque'' agreed to a two-year, $8 million incentive laden contract that could be worth as much as $12 million. Pending a physical. The Cubune just said sources & the Herald made reference to his agent. That's way too much! The guy didn't just avg less than 146 ip over 4 yrs. Two of the years topped out at 100 ip. Do the math, & you get about 125-30 ip. No use crying about it. If this is true then that's if for the SOX. No Vazquez & no other starters. He might have a few mil left to get a solid utility player & an experienced C. It's not so much the $ as it is the idea of the SOX overpaying. That's what me the most. It's like the Bears spending close to 40M on a defensive secondary that has to be close to the worst in the NFL. It's sad because the line is good, the linebackers are good, but the secondary blows. That makes the team one of the worst in the league. Arggghhhh! At least the seats will be forest green over the next two years. That's something I wanted since 1991. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 Good point. Miller has had serious injury problems, and is going to get paid more money than Hernandez. And Hernandez has pitched in many big games. 10 bucks says he doesn't get as good of a deal as Hernandez got. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 Southsider ... I qouted the wrong post., Sorry guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 Garland is a free agent at the end of the 2006 season unless they get a new deal worked out. So he will be here two more years unless traded. Or non-tendered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 Southsider ... I qouted the wrong post., Sorry guy. I'll delete it... I couldn't figure out what I did... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 Or non-tendered. Well, ya, i do not see them doing that since we can always use pitching. But it is a possiblity i guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 It's the base I have problems with. Who do we trust? The Cubune or the Miami Herald? The Cubune: the Sox offered a two-year heavily laden with incentives, worth as much as $4 million. The Herald: http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/sports/10472238.htm?1c ''El Duque'' agreed to a two-year, $8 million incentive laden contract that could be worth as much as $12 million. Pending a physical. The Cubune just said sources & the Herald made reference to his agent. That's way too much! The guy didn't just avg less than 146 ip over 4 yrs. Two of the years topped out at 100 ip. Do the math, & you get about 125-30 ip. No use crying about it. If this is true then that's if for the SOX. No Vazquez & no other starters. He might have a few mil left to get a solid utility player & an experienced C. It's not so much the $ as it is the idea of the SOX overpaying. That's what me the most. It's like the Bears spending close to 40M on a defensive secondary that has to be close to the worst in the NFL. It's sad because the line is good, the linebackers are good, but the secondary blows. That makes the team one of the worst in the league. Arggghhhh! At least the seats will be forest green over the next two years. That's something I wanted since 1991. Well the two year 4 mill is worth 4 mill a year. Thats what they are saying. Its what the score was saying. But I thought it was 4 mill a year and that was including the incentives or at least thats what the original posts made it seem. He's better then Grilli, but then again he could get hurt and we'd be stuck with Grilli anyway. And no one is going to tell me Matt Clement or Odalis Perez are as prone to injury as El Duque. Those two have consistently thrown 180 innings over the past few years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUGGERNAUT Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 I don't think he's saying Garland is quite the pitcher that these guys have been, however he's saying if you compare stats through a certain point of their careers that they're very comparable. Yeah, but that's pointless because it's rare for pitchers to break-out as underperformers. Consider RJ. When he was in the AL he was always considered good with a ton of talent but never great. Then he goes to the NL & becomes great. That's more common than an AL pitcher suddenly going from an underperformer to great. The best thing that can be said about Garland is that he's an above average bottom rotation guy who's had great durability over his career. If had better consistency he should have avg'd well over 200 ip in that time. But he doesn't so he typically falls short. There's always hope but many question still to this day whether he has the mental toughness needed to be a good to great SP. No one ever questions his stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 Garland will make it and prove you naysayers wrong. He'll never be Schilling or Johnson...god no, but he'll be good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 Yeah, but that's pointless because it's rare for pitchers to break-out as underperformers. Consider RJ. When he was in the AL he was always considered good with a ton of talent but never great. Then he goes to the NL & becomes great. That's more common than an AL pitcher suddenly going from an underperformer to great. The best thing that can be said about Garland is that he's an above average bottom rotation guy who's had great durability over his career. If had better consistency he should have avg'd well over 200 ip in that time. But he doesn't so he typically falls short. There's always hope but many question still to this day whether he has the mental toughness needed to be a good to great SP. No one ever questions his stuff. I question that mental toughness too. But, the dude is so very young and if you look at the stats these other guys put up at the same age or experience level, you'd realize that many of the Garland critics would have also been critical of these guys who went on to become studs. I don't know if Garland's got "it". But some of the best pitchers in the game today hadn't proved the had "it" at similar points in their careers. I'm just saying, don't give this guy away for someone who will never be a stud, though he may be a better pitcher than Garland is today. Garland does have a chance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lvjeremylv Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 Garland will make it and prove you naysayers wrong. He'll never be Schilling or Johnson...god no, but he'll be good. Oh he might become a good pitcher someday..but it won't be while wearing a White Sox uniform. Going to Dodger Stadium could be the best thing he could do. See: Jeff Weaver. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 Garland will make it and prove you naysayers wrong. He'll never be Schilling or Johnson...god no, but he'll be good. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 Oh he might become a good pitcher someday..but it won't be while wearing a White Sox uniform. Going to Dodger Stadium could be the best thing he could do. See: Jeff Weaver. You're right. Not in Sox uniform .... if he's traded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ISF Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 El Duque. LOL We just payed 2 yrs/8 mil for Grilli to be our 5th starter most of the year. And people say JR is cheap. We could have been paying league minimum for Grilli to be our 5th starter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.