Jump to content

Division Champs?


soxman352000

Recommended Posts

Speed? : Improved with Pods

Rotation? : Improved with El-Duque

Defense? : Improved with Dye.

Hitting? : Improved with healthy Dye, Thomas, & AJ.

Relief? : Improved with Hermannson a lot, Luis a little.

 

Meanwhile the Twinks lost Koskie, Guzman, Mientcy. Re-vamping their IF in 2005. What's the probabilities the new guys will be as good or better D than the old ones?

 

If you were a betting man you would say the CWS improved over last yr's injury plagued team at the same time the Twinks got weaker. That should give the CWS a nod in the div race.

 

But there are intangibles in these races. Can this CWS team beat the pairs of Santana-Radke & Westbrook-Sabathia? Because that's really been the difference in the division. We haven't been able to beat the top pitchers in the ALC or the AL period.

 

All in all I give the CWS a slight edge over the Twinks & CLE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can this CWS team beat the pairs of Santana-Radke & Westbrook-Sabathia? Because that's really been the difference in the division.  We haven't been able to beat the top pitchers in the ALC or the AL period. 

 

All in all I give the CWS a slight edge over the Twinks & CLE.

I slightly disagree. In 2003, for instance, I don't know about the top duo on each of the AL Central teams, but the Sox 1/2 combo at the end of the year was Loaiza and Buehrle, and they combined for a 35-23 record with a 3.53 ERA. That's not Cy Youngesque, but I don't think any duo in the Central that season bettered that. It's certainly as good as any other team. And obviously their offense has been at the top of the division probably each of the last 3-4 seasons. So what's been the problem?

 

It seems to me that the Sox always end up choking at *just* the right time in *just* the right spot. When they need a big pitch, they don't get it. When they need a big hit, they don't get it. When they need a big defensive play, they don't get it. When they need the ball to bounce one way, it bounces the other. SOMETHING always seems to end up going wrong for the White Sox.

 

It all comes down to attitude and actually believing that you can win. If things pan out well for the Sox and their new players can bring a positive outlook to the clubhouse, I can see good things happening in the coming years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

02-04:

Westbrook vs CWS: 3W-1L

Sabathia vs CWS: 5W-2L

Santana vs CWS: 3W-3L

Radke vs CWS: 6W-4L

Maroth vs CWS: 4W-3L

Robertson vs CWS: 2W-1L

Johnson vs CWS: 2W-2L

 

Over the past 3 yrs we do not have a winning record vs the 1-2 starters

of the Twinks, the Tribe, & the Tiggers. You can not expect to win a division as long as that is the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

02-04:

Westbrook vs CWS: 3W-1L

Sabathia    vs CWS: 5W-2L

Santana  vs CWS: 3W-3L

Radke    vs CWS: 6W-4L

Maroth      vs CWS: 4W-3L

Robertson vs CWS: 2W-1L

Johnson    vs  CWS: 2W-2L

 

Dye vs Westbrook: 1000 OPS

Dye vs Sabathia : 1214 OPS

Dye vs Maroth : 1133 OPS

Dye vs Johnson : 0900 OPS

Dye vs Santana : 0878 OPS

Dye vs Radke : 0448 OPS

 

It's improvement over most.

 

AJ vs Westbrook: 583 OPS

AJ vs Sabathia : 333 OPS

AJ vs Maroth : 900 OPS

AJ vs Johnson : 1000 OPS

 

CLE owns him.

 

Pods vs Milwood : 900 OPS

Pods vs Johnson : 1333 OPS

Pods vs Radke : 333 OPS

Pods vs Santana : 333 OPS

 

MIN owns him.

 

Rowand vs Westbrook, Sabathia : 000 OPS, 733 OPS

Rowand vs Maroth, Johnson : 1529 OPS, 629 OPS

Rowand vs Santana, Radke : 750 OPS, 833 OPS

 

Koney vs Westbrook, Sabathia : 1064 OPS, 487 OPS

Koney vs Maroth, Johnson : 735 OPS, 917 OPS

Koney vs Santana, Radke : 538 OPS, 836 OPS

 

Thomas vs Westbrook, Sabathia : 333 OPS, 1263 OPS

Thomas vs Maroth, Johnson : 1081 OPS, 988 OPS

Thomas vs Santana, Radke : 1222 OPS, 817 OPS

 

Uribe vs Milwood, Sabathia : 237 OPS, 789 OPS

Uribe vs Maroth, Robertson : 818 OPS, 1017 OPS

Uribe vs Santana, Radke : 833 OPS, 433 OPS

 

A healthy Dye & Thomas are key to the CWS. They have the best overall success against the top 6 opposing pitchers in the ALC. W/out both of them we can't win the div.

 

Everett vs Westbrook, Sabathia : 1415, 585

Everett vs Johnson, Robertson : 544, 600

Everett vs Santana, Radke : 1056, 399

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(NUKE_CLEVELAND @ Jan 10, 2005 -> 07:00 PM)
The burden of proof is definitely on the Sox at this point.

 

This could be an interesting season. I think the Tigers will be even stronger and the Royals could rebound, and of course Cleveland could get hot. I can't wait until the 40 game mark and see who's contendin and who's pretendin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Texsox @ Jan 10, 2005 -> 07:04 PM)
This could be an interesting season. I think the Tigers will be even stronger and the Royals could rebound, and of course Cleveland could get hot. I can't wait until the 40 game mark and see who's contendin and who's pretendin.

 

 

Everyone keeps saying that Cleveland is ready to make a run at the crown so yeah, things could get a little crazy in the Central this season. But that's part of the fun isin't it. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and if some of the question marks concerning pitching turns to be pretenders, then it is going to be a long summer.

 

 

duke, cont and garland.

 

well it is not fair for me to include garland there, he will give us 10-14 wins and 175+ innings.. i hope he does better being in the #5 hole. but the other 2????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(LDF @ Jan 11, 2005 -> 02:12 AM)
and if some of the question marks concerning pitching turns to be pretenders, then it is going to be a long summer.

duke, cont and garland.

 

well it is not fair for me to include garland there, he will give us 10-14 wins and 175+ innings.. i hope he does better being in the #5 hole. but the other 2????

 

 

You have a valid concern here, but our 3-4-5 slots have a lot less degree of being question marks than last year. Or better yet, they have a better chance of not being a disappointment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(soxman352000 @ Jan 9, 2005 -> 11:08 PM)
With additions such as Hermanson, Podsednik, Hernandez, and Pierzynski, is this the team that finally frigures out a way to beat the Twins and get us into the playoffs? Are there more moves that need to be done in order for the up and coming season to be successful or do think that we have done all we needed to this off season?  :bringit

Im not very sure about that. I like all those additions however we lost significant power in our lineup that we depended on aka lee and mags. I am really excited about our rotation though. Behind Garcia Buehrle Hernadez contreras and garland (who is now 5th in the rotations as opposed to 3rd) they may have the ability to carry them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(shingoisgod @ Jan 11, 2005 -> 10:01 AM)
Im not very sure about that. I like all those additions however we lost significant power in our lineup that we depended on aka lee and mags. I am really excited about our rotation though. Behind Garcia Buehrle Hernadez contreras and garland (who is now 5th in the rotations as opposed to 3rd) they may have the ability to carry them

 

 

I agree. We don't know if this reconfiguration of the Chicago White Sox is going to work at all. It may go right in the crapper.

 

Welcome to Soxtalk! :cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(NUKE_CLEVELAND @ Jan 11, 2005 -> 01:27 AM)
Everyone keeps saying that Cleveland is ready to make a run at the crown so yeah,  things could get a little crazy in the Central this season.  But that's part of the fun isin't it. :D

 

no more lawton though, they will score less runs and i dont see them as a threat, guess we'll find out in the opener vs them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no more lawton though, they will score less runs and i dont see them as a threat, guess we'll find out in the opener vs them

 

You have to take them serious though. Westbrook & Sabathia own winning records vs us & if Milwood can return to his Braves form that could give them the edge over us in the season series. But I would say that IF is pretty big. As big as Contreras winning 15 games for the CWS. If that happens we should win the division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...