Texsox Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 OK, we've improved in these areas. Is it a better mix than offense? You cannot defense against a 450 foot shot. I've been drinking the koolaide, but starting to wonder if it really is this easy, why doesn't every team do it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2HH Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Stop drinking the koolaide! I think the point is, the way we tried doing it the past three years did not work, so we are trying it this way instead. The only alternative is a higher payroll, which we do not have and will not be getting, therefore this is the only feasable answer KW could come up with. Personally, I like it. Should make for a more exciting brand of baseball. -y2 QUOTE(Texsox @ Jan 25, 2005 -> 09:05 PM) OK, we've improved in these areas. Is it a better mix than offense? You cannot defense against a 450 foot shot. I've been drinking the koolaide, but starting to wonder if it really is this easy, why doesn't every team do it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 QUOTE(Texsox @ Jan 25, 2005 -> 09:05 PM) OK, we've improved in these areas. Is it a better mix than offense? You cannot defense against a 450 foot shot. I've been drinking the koolaide, but starting to wonder if it really is this easy, why doesn't every team do it? I think this is a better offense then years past. This team might now score as many runs as it has in the past but I think it'll be more consistant and be able to manufacture runs in big games against good pitching. I'd honestly take this years offense over the ones we've had in the past, jmo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punch and Judy Garland Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 I'll take the pitching and bullpen and the d we have now. I wouldn't dream of taking this offense over the 00, 03, or even the 04 when healthy offense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 QUOTE(Texsox @ Jan 25, 2005 -> 09:05 PM) OK, we've improved in these areas. Is it a better mix than offense? You cannot defense against a 450 foot shot. I've been drinking the koolaide, but starting to wonder if it really is this easy, why doesn't every team do it? You can't defense speed either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamTell Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 I guess I wouldn't be surprised if we have a higher team batting average this year either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
striker Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 The things I look forward to are more consistency from our offense, more consistency in our pitching, a wider range of talent, a solid bench, and the only question mark I think right now is a bullpen spot and Crede. I'm so pumped for the season. I feel like having someone freeze my body until April. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlackSox8 Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 QUOTE(striker62704 @ Jan 25, 2005 -> 10:29 PM) The things I look forward to are more consistency from our offense, more consistency in our pitching, a wider range of talent, a solid bench, and the only question mark I think right now is a bullpen spot and Crede. I'm so pumped for the season. I feel like having someone freeze my body until April. I hate how after each move KW made made me more anxious to get to opening day....if it weren't for time i'd be a happier person...............and younger(even though i'm only 20) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnthraxFan93 Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 I think this is a better offense then years past. This team might now score as many runs as it has in the past but I think it'll be more consistant and be able to manufacture runs in big games against good pitching. I'd honestly take this years offense over the ones we've had in the past, jmo. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> On Paper yes I would take this version of the offesne than years past, lets see how it all works out before we say this one is better. IMO I think the "non" numbers will hurt but our overall numbers will be great.. if the pitching holds up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santo=dorf Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Last time I checked, the Sox set a franchise record for home runs in a season, and they did it with Maggs and Frank missing a combined 198 games (hell, Frank had one at bat in each of the 3 scrub games at Wrigley, so it was closer to 200.) Uribe can provide almost as much pop as Jose, but he can get on a lot more. Iguchi could potentially be an offensive upgrade over Harris/Uribe. Is there any was Joe Crede of 2005 can be worse than the Joe Crede of 2004? Konerko needs to start hitting on the road. AJ is a major offensive upgrade over Olivo/Alomar/Burke/Davis Rowand didn't start hitting until June last season. So the question is, "Is a combination of a healthy Carl Everett, Jermaine Dye, and Scott Podsednik better offensively than a Carlos Lee/Joe Borchard/Ross Gload/Timo Perez combo?" I think so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstralSox Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 WE STILL HAVE MORE THAN ENOUGH POWER!! Sorry, but don't forget Thomas and Ordonez were injured most of the year and we still ended up 2nd/3rd in the league in homeruns. Dye = Lee ...when healthy Uribe 23 hr last year Valentin hit 30hr and hit what, .213? Everybody in our lineup with the exception of Pods and maybe AJ are capable of hitting well over 20 hrs. Don't worry about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlackSox8 Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 QUOTE(santo=dorf @ Jan 25, 2005 -> 10:45 PM) Last time I checked, the Sox set a franchise record for home runs in a season, and they did it with Maggs and Frank missing a combined 198 games (hell, Frank had one at bat in each of the 3 scrub games at Wrigley, so it was closer to 200.) Uribe can provide almost as much pop as Jose, but he can get on a lot more. Iguchi could potentially be an offensive upgrade over Harris/Uribe. Is there any was Joe Crede of 2005 can be worse than the Joe Crede of 2004? Konerko needs to start hitting on the road. AJ is a major offensive upgrade over Olivo/Alomar/Burke/Davis Rowand didn't start hitting until June last season. So the question is, "Is a combination of a healthy Carl Everett, Jermaine Dye, and Scott Podsednik better offensively than a Carlos Lee/Joe Borchard/Ross Gload/Timo Perez combo?" I think so. All you need to say is Pod better than borchard/gload/perez combo....cuz obviously everett and dye are better than a plain Lee. And yes...Pod is better than that combo... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 QUOTE(TheBlackSox8 @ Jan 25, 2005 -> 10:47 PM) All you need to say is Pod better than borchard/gload/perez combo....cuz obviously everett and dye are better than a plain Lee. And yes...Pod is better than that combo... Just for the record your avatar pisses me off Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 All that i know is podsednik is the biggest key to us succeeding along with all five of our starters staying healthy ( mostly hernandez.) If podsednik has a respectable obp i think we make the playoffs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlackSox8 Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Jan 25, 2005 -> 10:49 PM) Just for the record your avatar pisses me off I know :finger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUGGERNAUT Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 I think the difference in years past is that if we got someone on we were always waiting for the bit hit. Now we have better odds at manufacturing a run w/out the big hit. Assuming Iggy can put up something near his 3 yr avg, our offense is down marginally as far as the big hit goes. It's up majorly as far as being able to squeeze out runs with small hits & just putting the ball in play. Every team doesn't play at the Cell. A lot of players looked at the numbers last year & especially Uribe & started looking at the Sox as a potential place to play. I think this trend is going to continue if we're among the top 5 in HR's & runs again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 QUOTE(AstralSox @ Jan 25, 2005 -> 10:46 PM) WE STILL HAVE MORE THAN ENOUGH POWER!! Sorry, but don't forget Thomas and Ordonez were injured most of the year and we still ended up 2nd/3rd in the league in homeruns. Dye = Lee ...when healthy Uribe 23 hr last year Valentin hit 30hr and hit what, .213? Everybody in our lineup with the exception of Pods and maybe AJ are capable of hitting well over 20 hrs. Don't worry about it. This is something I think people are looking over and not even realizing. This team still does have all kinds of power. There is no doubt in my mind that the Sox will still hit around 200 homers. However...Dye does not = Lee when healthy...Dye is a .270 25 80 .800 type player...Caballo is a .310 35 110 .900 type player, with a little more speed too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlackSox8 Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 QUOTE(witesoxfan @ Jan 25, 2005 -> 11:10 PM) This is something I think people are looking over and not even realizing. This team still does have all kinds of power. There is no doubt in my mind that the Sox will still hit around 200 homers. However...Dye does not = Lee when healthy...Dye is a .270 25 80 .800 type player...Caballo is a .310 35 110 .900 type player, with a little more speed too. But better defense and arm come with Dye......which was more of a necessity IMO...The loss of Lee doesn't hurt as much Offensively as the Gaining of Dye helps us Defensively Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 QUOTE(witesoxfan @ Jan 25, 2005 -> 11:10 PM) This is something I think people are looking over and not even realizing. This team still does have all kinds of power. There is no doubt in my mind that the Sox will still hit around 200 homers. However...Dye does not = Lee when healthy...Dye is a .270 25 80 .800 type player...Caballo is a .310 35 110 .900 type player, with a little more speed too. I think a healthy dye at the cell hits 30 and 100. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2HH Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 I agree 100%, I think many people are overlooking the fact that LEE played at US Cellular while Dye played in Oakland, where, as we all know, hitting home runs is a lot harder than it looks...Oakland owned us the past few years BECAUSE of that...we went there thinking 'small park, homer time', only it didn't quite work out that way...the ball seems to die there, while here, it keeps going. Also...people forget Everett has a winners attitude, and after his early season injury last year, combined with the fact he didn't feel as if his team stood a chance, he let himself go...on the Sox, Everett feels he has a REAL chance to win, so unlike last season, we get to see the REAL Everett. I think this guy is VASTLY underrated -- he has the heart of a champion and does ANYTHING to win. QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Jan 25, 2005 -> 11:15 PM) I think a healthy dye at the cell hits 30 and 100. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agame Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 I don't post much, but I thought I could add to this a bit. The biggest change will hopefully be consistency. The thing that has frustrated me in the past is not knowing which team will show up, (5 home runs or no runs). Case in point, the 2003 club had the same players as 2004 but the offense was not too great that year even though pitching stepped up. The way the team is setup now, at least we can keep teams scoring less with our defense and pitching and manufacture the couple of runs that we need to pull of a win. I'd rather win 90-100 games by 1-2 run margin than 80 games by large margins. Obviously we will see if they can execute the game plan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlackSox8 Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 QUOTE(Y2HH @ Jan 25, 2005 -> 11:18 PM) I agree 100%, I think many people are overlooking the fact that LEE played at US Cellular while Dye played in Oakland, where, as we all know, hitting home runs is a lot harder than it looks...Oakland owned us the past few years BECAUSE of that...we went there thinking 'small park, homer time', only it didn't quite work out that way...the ball seems to die there, while here, it keeps going. Also...people forget Everett has a winners attitude, and after his early season injury last year, combined with the fact he didn't feel as if his team stood a chance, he let himself go...on the Sox, Everett feels he has a REAL chance to win, so unlike last season, we get to see the REAL Everett. I think this guy is VASTLY underrated -- he has the heart of a champion and does ANYTHING to win. he was an all star in 2003....can he be in 05. IMO probably not...but it's up to him...not me. He will definitely improve upon 04's numbers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUGGERNAUT Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 All I can say on the Dye vs Lee debate is that most scouts & analysts that covered the off-season believe this signing to have been one of the best. They are expecting a big year out of Dye at the Cell. The fantasy league sites have written the same thing. In addition they expect Lee to decline a little in numbers for the Brewcrew. The potential is there for a Maggs like year out of Dye. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.