greasywheels121 Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 Seattle slugger cited for DUI; spokeswoman says he was not impaired VANCOUVER, Wash. (AP) - New Seattle Mariners first baseman Richie Sexson was cited for drunken driving last weekend after being stopped for speeding. Sexson, who signed a $50 million, four-year, free-agent contract with Seattle in December, was stopped Feb. 5 near his Clark County home. Linda Dozoretz, a spokeswoman for Sexson, confirmed late Friday that he was stopped for speeding and was later ``charged with driving under the influence.'' Dozoretz said in a statement that Sexson was not impaired ``based on the two Breathalyzer tests he later took.'' She said she was confident the charges would be amended. A spokesman for the county prosecutor was not immediately available Friday night. Sexson entered a plea of not guilty on Wednesday, according to court records. Clark County sheriff's Deputy Gregory Chaney said he initially stopped Sexson for speeding, according to two television reports. The deputy estimated Sexson's speed in excess of 50 mph in a 35 mph zone. The deputy said in his report that he suspected Sexson was intoxicated after noticing a ``strong odor of intoxicants emitting from the driver's window,'' and seeing an opened six-pack of beer bottles in the back seat of the car. According to the report, Sexson refused to take a portable breath test at the scene and then failed a series of field sobriety tests. An hour later, Sexson took two breath tests at the sheriff's office, both times registering below Washington's legal intoxication threshold. The sheriff's office said in a statement late Friday that Sexson submitted two breath samples and was then cited for DUI, but the statement did not provide the results of those breath tests. Repeated calls to sheriff's office spokesmen were not returned Friday night. ``It is our understanding Richie was originally stopped for driving over the speed limit,'' Mariners spokesman Tim Hevly said, adding that the team was told Sexson ``took and passed two Breathalyzer tests.'' A career .271 hitter with 200 home runs, the 30-year-old Sexson injured his left shoulder last season with Arizona and didn't play after May, batting .233 with nine homers and 23 RBIs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxmatt Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 What an idiot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 So what, he's got an excuse for sucking it up in Safeco for the next 4 years now huh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queen Prawn Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 If he passed two breathalyzers, how could he be charged with DUI? That doesn't make any sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 QUOTE(Queen Prawn @ Feb 13, 2005 -> 03:10 AM) If he passed two breathalyzers, how could he be charged with DUI? That doesn't make any sense. Someone from Milwaulkee must have put a curse on him or something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queen Prawn Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Feb 12, 2005 -> 10:12 AM) Someone from Milwaulkee must have put a curse on him or something. LOL! That's as good an explanation as any lol! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxmatt Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 According to the report, Sexson refused to take a portable breath test at the scene and then failed a series of field sobriety tests. Thats probably why. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queen Prawn Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 QUOTE(Chisoxmatt @ Feb 12, 2005 -> 10:15 AM) Thats probably why. The last line of the article claims he took two and passed them, that's why I was puzzled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFanForever Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 Only thing I know is that a guy his size would not get drunk off a 6 pack. I don't think he is that much of a lightweight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesox91403 Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 (edited) QUOTE(Queen Prawn @ Feb 12, 2005 -> 10:27 AM) The last line of the article claims he took two and passed them, that's why I was puzzled. I'm puzzled too. This makes no sense. If someone passes a BAC test, they are free to go as long as DUI is the only charge. Actually I am going to edit this based on an assumption. With the BAC being a .7? If IIRC, and the article saying that he took the tests at the station an hour later. Therefore, I am going to assume they are going to attempt to try and prove that he was on his way down and legally drunk at the time of stop. There are various ways to prove this. Hope that helps. Edited February 13, 2005 by whitesox91403 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 MLB's response: "Well, at least it wasn't a 40 dollar whore." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFanForever Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 QUOTE(knightni @ Feb 13, 2005 -> 02:03 AM) MLB's response: "Well, at least it wasn't a 40 dollar whore." :puke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 QUOTE(whitesox91403 @ Feb 12, 2005 -> 07:53 PM) I'm puzzled too. This makes no sense. If someone passes a BAC test, they are free to go as long as DUI is the only charge. Actually I am going to edit this based on an assumption. With the BAC being a .7? If IIRC, and the article saying that he took the tests at the station an hour later. Therefore, I am going to assume they are going to attempt to try and prove that he was on his way down and legally drunk at the time of stop. There are various ways to prove this. Hope that helps. with a BAC of .7 he would be dead. It must be .07 which is under legally drunk in any state. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesox91403 Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Feb 13, 2005 -> 06:40 PM) with a BAC of .7 he would be dead. It must be .07 which is under legally drunk in any state. typo, yes, I meant .07 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Honda Civic Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 The .07 he blew was over an hour after he was stopped... standard in something like your BAL falls about .01 per hour of sobriety... But, one would assume that a guy of Sexson's size metabolizes alcohol at a faster rate than say 115lb. woman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wise Master Buehrle Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 Guys... the answer is very simple. He too two Breathalyzer tests. They simply added them together. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.