GoodAsGould Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 why exactly is a celtics fan trying to talk trash :banghead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiff Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 QUOTE(SoxFan101 @ Mar 6, 2005 -> 12:04 AM) why exactly is a celtics fan trying to talk trash :banghead Hmm, is 16 championships not enough? Or we can get really elementary and rely on the fact that they have a better record and head-to-head than Chicago. But I wasn't even trying to talk s***. I was just bitter about all the assholes who ripped on them a month ago when the Bulls were sooooooooo superior. Just letting you all reap what you sowed. Now you see how up-and-down it really can be. So maybe next time people won't be so quick to judge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ishmookie Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 (edited) :banghead we're in deep trouble if we dont start winning soon. Edited March 6, 2005 by Ishmookie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 Yeah that would be true... We need Deng back, just watch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxman35 Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 i new it was too good to be true the bulls are not going to make the playoff i give up on them they LOST TO THE BUCKS they suck :headshake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 Yep, the sky is falling there is no way we can win 1 game the rest of the season. Step back from the ledge, we're gonna have bad streches. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 Hell, Milwaukee destroyed Seattle the other day, s*** happens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxman35 Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 yeah but we are so unconsistant Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 Since December 15th: 24-12 Real inconsistant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 The Bulls miss Deng because there's no real replacement who can come in and do all the things he can do. Sure Noc will be a player, and he hustles like hell on the court, but he's not a good shooter, and teams will attack him as the weak link. Duhon and Noc aren't really capable NBA starters at this point of their careers, even though Duhon's done a good job at everything but shooting thus far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxman35 Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Mar 5, 2005 -> 11:23 PM) Since December 15th: 24-12 Real inconsistant. yeah well look how they are playing now buddy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 QUOTE(soxman35 @ Mar 6, 2005 -> 12:11 AM) yeah well look how they are playing now buddy Teams lose 3 straight s*** happens. Winning at SA is the toughest win in the NBA , we almost did it. Houstons another damn good team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxman35 Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Mar 6, 2005 -> 12:15 AM) Teams lose 3 straight s*** happens. Winning at SA is the toughest win in the NBA , we almost did it. Houstons another damn good team. yeah but u did not and u lost to the bucks wow there amasing now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
backman Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 this was really disapointing, getting blown out of the water by houston, almost but not really beating the spurs in sanatonio! and blowing the lead over struggling miwalkie, skiles will be bustin some heads! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 QUOTE(soxman35 @ Mar 6, 2005 -> 12:19 AM) yeah but u did not and u lost to the bucks wow there amasing now Yeah no ones ever lost to the Bucks. Apparently, Cleveland, Detroit, Indiana, Houston, Orlando, Boston, and Seattle are all f***ed too? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammerhead johnson Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Mar 6, 2005 -> 04:39 PM) Yeah no ones ever lost to the Bucks. Apparently, Cleveland, Detroit, Indiana, Houston, Orlando, Boston, and Seattle are all f***ed too? Haha, yeah. The Bulls had it won, but they choked and allowed Milwaukee to score 13 unanswered points in the 4th quarter. What are you gonna do? s*** happens. And besides, you can never, ever complain when your 7 man rotation includes 4 rookies and 3 guys who are barely old enough to drink. That's why I always laugh my ass off whenever people think the sky is falling. Get a clue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AngelasDaddy0427 Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 Why exactly wasn't Curry playing? They said he wasn't hurt. Did he piss someone off? Am I missing something? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 QUOTE(Jeckle2000 @ Mar 6, 2005 -> 04:01 PM) Why exactly wasn't Curry playing? They said he wasn't hurt. Did he piss someone off? Am I missing something? He doesn't block out, he doesn't play smart defense, and he doesn't hustle. In each game there has been a specific stupid play that has gotten him yanked. I think mostly it is a culmination of things that are giving him a short rope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoodAsGould Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 i understand Skiles wanting to be strict but i think if Curry played more we could of won that game which kind of pisses me off.... Its ok to make a point to a player or a team but not when that point directly affects the outcome of a game like it did against milwaukee. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 QUOTE(SoxFan101 @ Mar 6, 2005 -> 04:32 PM) i understand Skiles wanting to be strict but i think if Curry played more we could of won that game which kind of pisses me off.... Its ok to make a point to a player or a team but not when that point directly affects the outcome of a game like it did against milwaukee. That's all conjecture. At the same token if Curry was in the game, who's to say that Joe Smith couldn't have scored 30 on Eddy? You never know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.