Sad aspect of globalization

[Soxy]

Languages dying

 

Knowledge Fades As Africa Languages Die

 

By TERRY LEONARD, Associated Press Writer

 

MAPUTO, Mozambique - A U.N. Conference on Trade and Development report on protecting traditional knowledge argues that beyond a devastating impact on culture, the death of a language wipes out centuries of know-how in preserving ecosystems — leading to grave consequences for biodiversity.

 

The United Nations (news - web sites) estimates half of the world's 6,000 languages will disappear in less than a century. Roughly a third of those are spoken in Africa and about 200 already have less than 500 speakers. Experts estimate half the world's people now use one of just eight languages: Chinese, English, Hindi, Spanish, Russian, Arabic, Portuguese and French.

 

Villagers in Indonesia's Kayan Mentarang national park, for example, have for centuries practiced a system of forest management called Tanah Ulen, or "forbidden land." On a rotating basis, elders declare parcels of the forest protected, prohibiting hunting and gathering.

 

Along a boulevard lined with flowering acacia trees, young people in designer clothes and high-heeled shoes chatter on the sidewalk struggling to be heard over the driving Latin rhythms spilling from a nightclub.

 

Maputo's vibrant nightlife lets people forget it is the capital of one of the world's poorest countries. Here you can eat Italian, dance like a Brazilian and flirt in Portuguese.

 

One thing that's in ever shorter supply and perhaps even less demand: Mozambique's own indigenous languages, the storehouse for the accumulated knowledge of generations.

 

"Sons no longer speak the language of their fathers ... our culture is dying," laments Paulo Chihale, director of a project that seeks to train Mozambican youths in traditional crafts.

 

While Mozambique has 23 native languages, the only official one is Portuguese — a hand-me-down tongue from colonial times that at once unifies a linguistically diverse country and undermines the African traditions that help make it unique.

 

Chihale looks up from his cluttered desk at MozArte, the U.N.- and government-funded crafts project, and complains bitterly about how his nation's memory is fading away.

 

"Our culture has a rich oral tradition, oral history, stories told from one generation to another. But it is an oral literature our kids will never hear," says Chihale, who speaks the Chopi language at home.

 

Anthropologists speculate that tribal people whose ancestors have lived for tens of thousands of years on India's Andaman and Nicobar islands survived Asia's tsunami catastrophe because of ancient knowledge. They think signs in the wind, the sea and the flight of birds let the tribes know to get to higher ground ahead of the waves.

 

But finding economic reasons to keep tradition alive can be a challenge.

 

In Mozambique, cheap foreign imports have destroyed the market for local crafts beyond what little can be sold to tourists. Horacio Arab, the son of a basket weaver who learned his father's trade, said he improved his skills at MozArte but then abandoned weaving because he could not make a living.

 

Mozambican linguist Rafael Shambela says the pressures from globalization are often too great to resist. To conserve native languages and culture will require societies to find ways to cast them with an inherent value, he argues.

 

On a small campus along a dirt road south of Maputo, Shambela has joined a government effort to write textbooks and curriculums that will allow public school students to learn in 16 of the country's 23 languages. But the program is limited by Mozambique's poverty.

 

"A language is a culture," says Shambela, who works for Mozambique's National Institute for the Development of Education. "It contains the history of a people and all the knowledge they have passed down for generations."

 

The trade-off in settling on Portuguese as a unifying force after independence in 1975 has been an erosion of the rites and rhythms of traditional life.

 

"From dating to mourning, the rules are becoming less clear," Shambela says.

[WilliamTell]

It does seem sad and I'm not trying to sound mean or anything but I almost feel that it's somewhat better that they learn other languages too. It's just too bad that they have to give their own up. I can't believe there is over 6000 lanquages though, too many in my opinion.

[Soxy]

It does seem sad and I'm not trying to sound mean or anything but I almost feel that it's somewhat better that they learn other languages too. It's just too bad that they have to give their own up. I can't believe there is over 6000 lanquages though, too many in my opinion.

Would you feel that way if YOU spoke one of the language on the verge of extinction? I honestly feel that language and culture are inseparable--so taking language out of a culture is a pretty devastating blow to that community.

 

In one of my linguistics courses the textbook said that, on average, a language disappears about once every other week...

 

Why are more languages bad? I guess I don't understand that, so I would be grateful for a thoughtful response.

 

I guess I would also be more sympathetic to that viewpoint if we weren't such a monolingual culture--i.e. more people were fluent in more languages.

Edited March 7, 2005 by ChiSoxyGirl

[JUGGERNAUT]

Capitalism does not know the definitions of culture, tradition, or honor.

It's a system that by it's very nature consolidates all aspects of civilization down to that which can be mass produced cheaply. Language is no exception.

 

What good is America's right to free speech if that right is governed by capitalist principles? Every nation on the planet is going to face this same dilemma.

 

The nature of capitalism is very much like that of the Borg. Assimilate new cultures, make use of that which can be profitable, & discard the rest. The only thing that stands in it's way is democracy & regulation to protect that which capitalism sees no value in.

[WilliamTell]

But what good is it if 50 people know only 1 langauge the no one else knows. Languages have been dissapearing and reappearing through out time. It's just like the family farm. There are less and less of them because the bigger corperations buy them out. Whether that's also good or bad, you decide.......

Edited March 7, 2005 by WilliamTell

[santo=dorf]

I really get a kick out of people who use the internet to complain about globalization.

[TheBigHurt35]

I don't want to see any language "die," but it's much easier to communicate with others when people are actually able to, you know, understand what each other is saying.

Edited March 8, 2005 by TheBigHurt35

[Texsox]

It does seem sad and I'm not trying to sound mean or anything but I almost feel that it's somewhat better that they learn other languages too. It's just too bad that they have to give their own up. I can't believe there is over 6000 lanquages though, too many in my opinion.

Americans are so adaptable, I remember when we jumped at the chance to switch to the worldwide accepted metric system back in the 70s. Less adaptable societies would have clung to the old system. I am certain we wouldn't have a problem switching to French

[JUGGERNAUT]

Americans are so adaptable, I remember when we jumped at the chance to switch to the worldwide accepted metric system back in the 70s. Less adaptable societies would have clung to the old system. I am certain we wouldn't have a problem switching to French

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Spanglish any one? It's America's new standard.

 

Do you think that would ever happen in China?