LosMediasBlancas Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7129260/ None of this means anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 It discredits him. Now whether he is telling the truth or not, the fact that he is a liar is hanging over him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosMediasBlancas Posted March 9, 2005 Author Share Posted March 9, 2005 Can they still settle? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 They can at anytime until the jury gets the case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyho7476 Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 QUOTE(LosMediasBlancas @ Mar 9, 2005 -> 01:22 PM) http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7129260/ None of this means anything. I don't see how you can say it means nothing. This kids credibility is full of holes now. I hate MJ and would love to see him go to jail just for being a weirdo, but these types of things lead me toward innocence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosMediasBlancas Posted March 9, 2005 Author Share Posted March 9, 2005 The guy has never been convicted of anything and he'll probably settle ro walk. Luckily being a weirdo is not enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 Jackson failed to show up for court today.. supposedly he's at the hospital again.. and supposedly the judge issued a warrant for his arrest if he doesn't show up to court within an hour. What a moron.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 QUOTE(Steff @ Mar 10, 2005 -> 10:56 AM) Jackson failed to show up for court today.. supposedly he's at the hospital again.. and supposedly the judge issued a warrant for his arrest if he doesn't show up to court within an hour. What a moron.. They'll revoke his bail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 QUOTE(YASNY @ Mar 10, 2005 -> 10:58 AM) They'll revoke his bail. Yep.. $3 million bones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBigHurt35 Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 QUOTE(Steff @ Mar 10, 2005 -> 10:56 AM) What a moron.. Finally, we agree on something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 QUOTE(TheBigHurt35 @ Mar 10, 2005 -> 11:00 AM) Finally, we agree on something. Apparently you have me confused with someone else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 IMHO, after they send Michael Jackson to prison, lock up any parent who was stupid enough to allow their young children unsupervised visits with Jackson. Maybe not as punishment, but is it safe for somone that stupid to be walking around?? Seriously, if you were making a list of celebrities to not allow private visits with, Jackson has got to be on your Top 10 list, unless you have a daughter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 He's late.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 So if he's at the hospital, admitted or something, does the warrant still count? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Honda Civic Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 He just showed up, the TV coverage is akin to the OJ/Al Cowlings fiasco. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBigHurt35 Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 I don't know what's more ridiculous: Mr. Jackson's behavior or the fact that it's all over the news. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 This is not a case to be settled, because it's not a civil lawsuit. It's a criminal case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 And by the way, there's NO WAY he is found guilty. You can run a f***ing semi through the holes on the "reasonable doubt" of the evidence just with the testimony thus far. The only slight, and I mean slight, glimmer is if the kid on the stand now (the actual accuser) can fire a missle in his testimony under cross-examiniation and I would say that the chances of that are slim to none. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queen Prawn Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 QUOTE(kapkomet @ Mar 10, 2005 -> 12:53 PM) The only slight, and I mean slight, glimmer is if the kid on the stand now (the actual accuser) can fire a missle in his testimony under cross-examiniation and I would say that the chances of that are slim to none. While I agree with you, one thing that is going through the jury's mind is Jackson's avoidance of court today with the accuser on the stand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 There was a Grand Canyon Wide opening in the Scott Peterson trial, also.. you see where he's sitting... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosMediasBlancas Posted March 10, 2005 Author Share Posted March 10, 2005 I agree, fat chance he's found guilty. As far as the parents who let their kids hang out with Jackson, of course they do, how else are they supposed to set him up? The letters from parents pour in, about poor little Bobby or Suzy who has brain cancer. Hopefully Jackson asks to meet their child, the child spends the night a few times and Cha-Ching. They have to pay those hospital bills somehow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxy Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 QUOTE(kapkomet @ Mar 10, 2005 -> 12:53 PM) And by the way, there's NO WAY he is found guilty. You can run a f***ing semi through the holes on the "reasonable doubt" of the evidence just with the testimony thus far. I don't think he be found guilty, but isn't reasonable doubt only for murder. I thought there was a lesser burden of proof on other cases... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreye Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 QUOTE(Queen Prawn @ Mar 10, 2005 -> 01:54 PM) While I agree with you, one thing that is going through the jury's mind is Jackson's avoidance of court today with the accuser on the stand. They're not allowed to take that into consideration. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queen Prawn Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 QUOTE(mreye @ Mar 10, 2005 -> 01:57 PM) They're not allowed to take that into consideration. They are human and they can try to keep that out of mind as much as possible, but it will color how they see other things in the case. As they say on Law and Order, you can't unring a bell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreye Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 QUOTE(Queen Prawn @ Mar 10, 2005 -> 03:08 PM) They are human and they can try to keep that out of mind as much as possible, but it will color how they see other things in the case. As they say on Law and Order, you can't unring a bell. I hear ya. Under the law they can't, but in one particular juror's mind, that's a different story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.