Jabroni Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 (edited) http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/index Winds Of Change Spring is a time of change for some players. And Jermaine Dye is an example of that. Jerry Crasnick runs down a list of six players hoping for better times with new teams in '05. Story You need ESPN Insider to read the article. Edited March 15, 2005 by Jabroni Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sox1422 Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 (edited) Post removed by Admin Edited March 16, 2005 by southsider2k5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greasywheels121 Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 I'm really glad Dye's here. He's always been one of those guys in baseball I liked; kind of nice having him in Chicago now. He could be the poor man's Robin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punch and Judy Garland Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 I think Dye will be productive but I wouldn't hold my breath for 305-31-99. I really wonder how many steals Pods will end up with. You would think he'd have an increase with such an awful obp last year but more than 70 is hard to imagine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpringfieldFan Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 QUOTE(Punch and Judy Garland @ Mar 15, 2005 -> 05:39 PM) I think Dye will be productive but I wouldn't hold my breath for 305-31-99. I really wonder how many steals Pods will end up with. You would think he'd have an increase with such an awful obp last year but more than 70 is hard to imagine Tim Raines has said that, personally, he would like to see Pods steal a hundred this year. LT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 QUOTE(SpringfieldFan @ Mar 15, 2005 -> 12:15 PM) Tim Raines has said that, personally, he would like to see Pods steal a hundred this year. LT Ya so would the rest of us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 I believe it is illegal to post the entire article from insider. You can rephrase it though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabroni Posted March 15, 2005 Author Share Posted March 15, 2005 I believe it is illegal to post the entire article from insider. You can rephrase it though. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> :headshake :headshake :headshake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSGuy406 Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 QUOTE(Jabroni @ Mar 15, 2005 -> 08:00 PM) :headshake :headshake :headshake ??? I believe qwerty is right. There's a reason they have you pay for EI... Also, isn't that (more or less) why ESPNLite was shut down? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 QUOTE(Jabroni @ Mar 15, 2005 -> 02:00 PM) :headshake :headshake :headshake Yes, let's get soxtalk in trouble. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUGGERNAUT Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 I have found yet another reason to optimistic for 2005. Dye's road stats. 99 R 282/326/489/815 - 309 AB 00 R 301/381/551/932 - 296 AB 01 R 303/361/484/845 - 287 AB 02 R 274/361/464/825 - 252 AB 03 R 136/242/184/426 - 103 AB 04 R 247/301/437/738 - 279 AB Career 272/334/463/797 - 3818 AB He was traded to Oak in 01. The ALW ERA has been significantly lower than the ALC. He should be more than capable of putting up his 2002 #'s with the Sox on the Road. If he does that he's earned his pay. Home wise we have his Cell #'s: 99 Cell 385/407/500/907 00 Cell 273/346/773/1.119 01 Cell 240/296/480/776 That's about 100 AB. He's had only 8 AB's since. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 QUOTE(qwerty @ Mar 15, 2005 -> 02:06 PM) Yes, let's get soxtalk in trouble. dont be such a baby Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 QUOTE(rangercal @ Mar 15, 2005 -> 05:21 PM) dont be such a baby Easy for you to say. :headshake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 QUOTE(Kalapse @ Mar 15, 2005 -> 05:29 PM) Easy for you to say. :headshake you need to stop kissing ass on this board. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 QUOTE(rangercal @ Mar 15, 2005 -> 05:31 PM) you need to stop kissing ass on this board. Since when do I f***ing kiss ass? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 Don't be a baby? You're right let's post Insider articles when it's completely illegal. Qwerty you idiot, stop pointing out when people break the law. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Mar 15, 2005 -> 05:37 PM) Don't be a baby? You're right let's post Insider articles when it's completely illegal. Qwerty you idiot, stop pointing out when people break the law. See now appearently you're kissing ass. If kissing ass is giving a s*** then I guess a lot of us kiss ass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 Haha if in some weird way that's kissing ass then so be it, it's just a stupid thing to get f***ed for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wise Master Buehrle Posted March 16, 2005 Share Posted March 16, 2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted March 16, 2005 Share Posted March 16, 2005 QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Mar 15, 2005 -> 05:40 PM) Haha if in some weird way that's kissing ass then so be it, it's just a stupid thing to get f***ed for. I smelled you coming as soon as I replied to qwerty. you guys must live together. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted March 16, 2005 Share Posted March 16, 2005 QUOTE(rangercal @ Mar 15, 2005 -> 06:15 PM) I smelled you coming as soon as I replied to qwerty. you guys must live together. Yea we do, it's really a great time. I don't give a s*** who you replied to, calling someone a baby for pointing out that someone broke a law is f***ing retarded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted March 16, 2005 Share Posted March 16, 2005 QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Mar 15, 2005 -> 06:19 PM) Yea we do, it's really a great time. I don't give a s*** who you replied to, calling someone a baby for pointing out that someone broke a law is f***ing retarded. this was not the first time I seen something on a message board posted from insider. It also was not the first time I seen something on this board from insider. It was the first time I seen people running scared over it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted March 16, 2005 Share Posted March 16, 2005 Running scared or pointing out something is illeagal? They don't make you pay for it for nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted March 16, 2005 Share Posted March 16, 2005 QUOTE(rangercal @ Mar 15, 2005 -> 06:21 PM) this was not the first time I seen something on a message board posted from insider. It also was not the first time I seen something on this board from insider. It was the first time I seen people running scared over it. That is probally the first time you have seen an entire article posted from insider. It is illegal plain and simple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUGGERNAUT Posted March 16, 2005 Share Posted March 16, 2005 Are you aware of surpnova.org, & lokitorrents.com? Both were shutdown & ressurected as pay sites. Why? Because they decided to see what their sites were with on the open market & in doing opened themselves to a major suit by the MPAA & other intellectual copyright holders. You hear a lot about this stuff & as long as your site remains non-profit & private (to some degree) for the most part you are allowed to exist & no one really pays attention to the IP (intellectual property) laws you violate. But as soon as you try to seek a value to your content the hammer comes down hard. The moral of the story is that out of a sense of loyalty, honor & respect to the fine men & women who run Soxtalk for us all you should adhere to IP laws. It's ok to post the link, make reference to the link, & paraphrase the link but don't reproduce the link in it's entirety. You never know when Jason might decide to see what Soxtalk is worth. I'd hate to be amongst those who ruin it for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.