Kalapse Posted March 29, 2005 Share Posted March 29, 2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamTell Posted March 29, 2005 Share Posted March 29, 2005 QUOTE(Kalapse @ Mar 29, 2005 -> 01:05 PM) LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosMediasBlancas Posted March 29, 2005 Share Posted March 29, 2005 sorry if this is posted elsewhere, strange source, but here it is, 3 paragraphs down: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2005/scor....mlb/index.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilJester99 Posted March 29, 2005 Share Posted March 29, 2005 There is a thread on this "More crap from Minny" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxman352000 Posted March 29, 2005 Share Posted March 29, 2005 QUOTE(EvilJester99 @ Mar 29, 2005 -> 01:17 PM) Minny more than likely trying to stir the pot in hopes it will piss AJ off and he will become a distraction... I don't see it working. Minny can f*** off :fyou Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santo=dorf Posted March 30, 2005 Share Posted March 30, 2005 (edited) QUOTE(Gene Honda Civic @ Mar 29, 2005 -> 12:24 PM) Classic case of a sports writer having too much power and trying to make his own story.... mailto:[email protected] <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Anyone else e-mail this asshole? I see your baseless, half-ass rumor about the White Sox wanting to trade AJ Pierzynski has made it's way to www.cnnsi.com. Do you have a credible "source" or even a "source" for this story? Many members of the White Sox family have talked about AJ and they haven't said anything bad about him because there is nothing that he has done to deserve criticism. AJ talks about how the rumors in SF were overblown, and recently Matt Herges came out and said he regrets making comments to the San Francisco papers about AJ. Remember the story about how AJ gave Joe Borchard $100 for hitting a homer off of Brett Tomko? That doesn't sound like a clubhouse problem to me. Here's some advice from an intelligent baseball fan; Next time you make up a story, be sure that you check the facts so readers don't question your credibility. Under the current CBA, Major League free agents come with an automatic no-trade clause until June 15. It is obvious you were not aware of this while you were "reporting" this "story." Edited March 30, 2005 by santo=dorf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JimH Posted March 30, 2005 Share Posted March 30, 2005 Not to stir the pot here, but because Pierzynski was non tendered by the Giants, does he fall under those same no-trade rules, i.e. can't be traded until June? For the record, I think the column was baseless and without merit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Honda Civic Posted March 30, 2005 Share Posted March 30, 2005 QUOTE(JimH @ Mar 29, 2005 -> 06:13 PM) Not to stir the pot here, but because Pierzynski was non tendered by the Giants, does he fall under those same no-trade rules, i.e. can't be traded until June? For the record, I think the column was baseless and without merit. I wrote a rather terse reply to the guy too, but I didn't send it because I was unsure, because he still hadn't reached arbitration, if he fell under those rules.... There would be nothing worse than calling a guy out for not knowing what he was talking about and stirring the pot, only to be wrong. I glanced through the CBA, but I'm terrible at reading those things. Legal jargon always sounds like exactly the opposite of what it actually says to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sec159row2 Posted March 30, 2005 Share Posted March 30, 2005 the story sounds like a hook put in the water ... and you all just bit.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted March 30, 2005 Share Posted March 30, 2005 QUOTE(JimH @ Mar 29, 2005 -> 06:13 PM) Not to stir the pot here, but because Pierzynski was non tendered by the Giants, does he fall under those same no-trade rules, i.e. can't be traded until June? For the record, I think the column was baseless and without merit. Some time after my posts on the subject, that exact thought crossed my mind. I don't know the answer, however. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Godfather Posted March 30, 2005 Share Posted March 30, 2005 (edited) AJ may be getting traded??? This was said in the st. Paul Pioneer press today. "Word in Chicago is that the White Sox are having second thoughts about their acquisition of ex-Twins catcher A.J. Pierzynski, and might try to trade him soon." Sorry if this has been posted but I just seen it and didnt see anything mentioned on here. This would really shock me if it were true. http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/s...rs/11253831.htm that is the link you may need to sign up for it but it there. Nothing more was stated but was I put in this message though. Edited March 30, 2005 by The_Godfather Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted March 30, 2005 Share Posted March 30, 2005 http://www.soxtalk.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=31411 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilJester99 Posted March 30, 2005 Share Posted March 30, 2005 (edited) Bruce Levineline just said there is no truth to the Sox wanting to trade AJ its Ben Davis they are willing to trade...as was stated b4. He went so far to say that Ben Davis could be traded by the end of today... Edited March 30, 2005 by EvilJester99 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santo=dorf Posted March 30, 2005 Share Posted March 30, 2005 QUOTE(YASNY @ Mar 29, 2005 -> 11:09 PM) Some time after my posts on the subject, that exact thought crossed my mind. I don't know the answer, however. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I quoted you as my source. I did get a response back from him. i'm not smart enough to make up a story. walters I guess that's what they teach journalists in College. :rolly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUGGERNAUT Posted March 30, 2005 Share Posted March 30, 2005 http://rays.tbo.com/rays/MGBXRO03X6E.html Another catcher, A.J. Pierzynski of the White Sox, is on the trading block. Are they that impressed with Widger? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabroni Posted March 30, 2005 Share Posted March 30, 2005 (edited) http://rays.tbo.com/rays/MGBXRO03X6E.html Another catcher, A.J. Pierzynski of the White Sox, is on the trading block. Are they that impressed with Widger? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Where the hell have you been? Bruce LeVineLine reported that A.J. is not on the trading block. He also said that the Sox could trade Davis by the end of the day. Widger would be our our backup and Burke would be our third string catcher in Charlotte. Edited March 30, 2005 by Jabroni Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.