nitetrain8601 Posted March 31, 2005 Share Posted March 31, 2005 ...for if he was playing in the NL and at Wrigley Field in more particular?? I know there's alot of stat heads on this board, so I would like to see his translated stats. I would appreciate it alot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitetrain8601 Posted March 31, 2005 Author Share Posted March 31, 2005 Oh yeah, could someone also give me Prior's translated stats playing in the AL and at the Cell?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santo=dorf Posted March 31, 2005 Share Posted March 31, 2005 The sample sizes are too small, but just remember after coming to the Sox last season, Garcia had a road ERA of 3.25, road WHIP of 1.04, a .585 OPS against on the road , and a 10.15 K/9 on the road. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSGuy406 Posted March 31, 2005 Share Posted March 31, 2005 ERA+ is league adjusted ERA -- I dunno if this is what you're looking for, but if I'm not mistaken, this is a way to compare all pitchers, AL and NL, on an equal basis. (So it takes into account park factors -- just because a pitcher has a bad ERA pitching in Colorado won't mean his ERA+ is terrible): Garcia's career ERA+ is 114 (100 is AVG). His career high is 138, and his career low is 96. For reference, Mark Buehrle has a career 125 ERA+, Jon Garland has a career 101 ERA+, and Pedro Martinez has a career 167. I dunno why I picked those three names, just thought it was a good reference point... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted March 31, 2005 Share Posted March 31, 2005 QUOTE(CWSGuy406 @ Mar 30, 2005 -> 08:57 PM) ERA+ is league adjusted ERA -- I dunno if this is what you're looking for, but if I'm not mistaken, this is a way to compare all pitchers, AL and NL, on an equal basis. (So it takes into account park factors -- just because a pitcher has a bad ERA pitching in Colorado won't mean his ERA+ is terrible): Garcia's career ERA+ is 114 (100 is AVG). His career high is 138, and his career low is 96. For reference, Mark Buehrle has a career 125 ERA+, Jon Garland has a career 101 ERA+, and Pedro Martinez has a career 167. I dunno why I picked those three names, just thought it was a good reference point... Shows that Freddy was a very solid pitcher last year, Mark Buehrle has been very solid his entire career, Jon Garland is actually a slightly above average pitcher(barely), and that Pedro Martinez is god...or a really good pitcher - not sure which. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitetrain8601 Posted March 31, 2005 Author Share Posted March 31, 2005 ^^Thanks alot. That's what I was looking for. Can you give me Prior's??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider17 Posted March 31, 2005 Share Posted March 31, 2005 QUOTE(nitetrain8601 @ Mar 30, 2005 -> 08:32 PM) ...for if he was playing in the NL and at Wrigley Field in more particular?? I know there's alot of stat heads on this board, so I would like to see his translated stats. I would appreciate it alot. QUOTE(nitetrain8601 @ Mar 30, 2005 -> 08:34 PM) Oh yeah, could someone also give me Prior's translated stats playing in the AL and at the Cell?? Sounds like you have a Sox/cub bet going on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted March 31, 2005 Share Posted March 31, 2005 QUOTE(nitetrain8601 @ Mar 30, 2005 -> 09:00 PM) ^^Thanks alot. That's what I was looking for. Can you give me Prior's??? http://www.baseball-reference.com/p/priorma01.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSGuy406 Posted March 31, 2005 Share Posted March 31, 2005 QUOTE(witesoxfan @ Mar 31, 2005 -> 02:59 AM) Shows that Freddy was a very solid pitcher last year, Mark Buehrle has been very solid his entire career, Jon Garland is actually a slightly above average pitcher(barely), and that Pedro Martinez is god...or a really good pitcher - not sure which. If the Sox hadn't traded for Contreras last year, I would have loved for them to give some big bucks to Pedro. I know that's a dream thought, but he's so good... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AngelasDaddy0427 Posted March 31, 2005 Share Posted March 31, 2005 QUOTE(CWSGuy406 @ Mar 30, 2005 -> 09:11 PM) If the Sox hadn't traded for Contreras last year, I would have loved for them to give some big bucks to Pedro. I know that's a dream thought, but he's so good... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Could you imagine a rotation of: Buherle Pedro Garcia Garland McCarthy *Drools* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitetrain8601 Posted March 31, 2005 Author Share Posted March 31, 2005 QUOTE(CWSGuy406 @ Mar 30, 2005 -> 09:11 PM) If the Sox hadn't traded for Contreras last year, I would have loved for them to give some big bucks to Pedro. I know that's a dream thought, but he's so good... Oh god yeah. I was hoping that we would go after a Pedro type in the offseason, even though I know alot of people were against having Pedro this offseason. He would've been nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitetrain8601 Posted March 31, 2005 Author Share Posted March 31, 2005 QUOTE(southsider17 @ Mar 30, 2005 -> 09:01 PM) Sounds like you have a Sox/cub bet going on. Yep, and he lost. He said he would discredit Prior's best year and guarentee that Garcia still didn't have a better ERA+ in any year. He was wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZoomSlowik Posted March 31, 2005 Share Posted March 31, 2005 What was he thinking? Anyone who owns a computer can look and see that Garcia was one of the best in the league in 2001. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.