kapkomet Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 I have not read through any of the game threads, etc. And I have little idea other then MB pitched his ass off, and Shingo got the save. But I will say this, and people that were there or watched, help me out here. Is this not the kind of game that last year, we found ways to lose? 1-0... not the 11-0 or 12-2 crap... the one run, squeaker, mentally tough kind of games... Let's hope this continues, because the mental makeup of a team can go a long ways to win games like these... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greasywheels121 Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 (edited) Exactly. We never won a game last year where just scored 1 run. If we can win games like this during the '05 season, our optimism will be justified. Edited April 5, 2005 by greasywheels121 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Honda Civic Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 Just a pitcher's duel... We won these games at the begining of the year last season too... We started out like 11-1 in 1-run games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Lopez Ghost (old) Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 QUOTE(Gene Honda Civic @ Apr 4, 2005 -> 06:41 PM) Just a pitcher's duel... We won these games at the begining of the year last season too... We started out like 11-1 in 1-run games. Yeah, but I think a lot of those 1-run games were 13 to 12, some of which we were ahead by more but our bullpen of Mike Jackson and Kocheroo let in a lot of runs to get it to a one run game. Completely different animal from today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackie hayes Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 Great game for Buehrle, and it won't be his last one, but... Even Sandy Koufax wouldn't throw more than a few games like that in a full season in this age, based in this stadium. We can't count on this, we need more offense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Hudler Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 QUOTE(jackie hayes @ Apr 5, 2005 -> 12:53 AM) Great game for Buehrle, and it won't be his last one, but... Even Sandy Koufax wouldn't throw more than a few games like that in a full season in this age, based in this stadium. We can't count on this, we need more offense. I'd hope not. The guy is 69 years old!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackie hayes Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 QUOTE(Rex Hudler @ Apr 5, 2005 -> 01:06 AM) I'd hope not. The guy is 69 years old!!!! Cute, real cute. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 QUOTE(Rex Hudler @ Apr 5, 2005 -> 01:06 AM) I'd hope not. The guy is 69 years old!!!! Good one Rex! However, I think at his age that his fastball still might be a tad faster than Shingo's changeup. Your thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 Thank God for Buerhle. Anyone else on the Sox staff pitching this game and its an L. Buerhle really relies on the catcher to call the game, he rarely shakes them off. I think AJ calling the game will do nothing but make Buerhle even more effective. The guy gives up 2 hits and walks 1, and coerces 2 DPs. Totally dominating. The offense was offensive, but maybe Westbrook had something to do with that. Any time you score 1 run and win it goes in the column of the other 42 games Hawk and DJ always talk about when you win 60 and lose 60, its how you do in the rest that determines your success. I still can't get over how great Buerhle was today. One of the better performances you will ever see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabroni Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 Westbrook was dealing. He looked every bit as good as his 3.38 ERA of last season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 Westbrook had amazing sink and location on his pitches. I was thrilled when we scored the one run. After last years opener, it was great to win a game without choking away a 9th inning lead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JimH Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 I was at the game, in great seats. Westbrook was a stud today, every bit as good as Buehrle. Iguchi and Podesdnik both looked overmatched today but I was not shocked, Westbrook was that good. Buehrle and Shingo were better ... it ended up as a win, and IMO credit is due to Pierzynski, he called a magnificent game. Sox did just enough executing on offense to get it done. Very frankly with the way those two starting pitchers were dealing, I'm surprised anyone scored. It was a pitchers duel, plain and simple. One win in the column, let's focus on Wednesday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 QUOTE(JimH @ Apr 4, 2005 -> 08:15 PM) I was at the game, in great seats. Westbrook was a stud today, every bit as good as Buehrle. Iguchi and Podesdnik both looked overmatched today but I was not shocked, Westbrook was that good. Buehrle and Shingo were better ... it ended up as a win, and IMO credit is due to Pierzynski, he called a magnificent game. Sox did just enough executing on offense to get it done. Very frankly with the way those two starting pitchers were dealing, I'm surprised anyone scored. It was a pitchers duel, plain and simple. One win in the column, let's focus on Wednesday. No doubt that AJ and MB were in the rocking chair today. No sooner would Mark get the ball back from the previous pitch, and he would have his sign and be in the windup again. It was a thing of beauty. Groundball, after groundball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSGuy406 Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Apr 5, 2005 -> 02:22 AM) No doubt that AJ and MB were in the rocking chair today. No sooner would Mark get the ball back from the previous pitch, and he would have his sign and be in the windup again. It was a thing of beauty. Groundball, after groundball. I was watching the 1978 (I think that was the year) game where Bucky Dent hti the homerun to win it for the Yankees, and my dad turns and tells me, "That's what was so much better about the game back then than it is today." And he tells me to look at the pitcher, and, just like Buehrle, it was get the sign, throw it, get the sign, throw it. Nice and quick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 (edited) QUOTE(CWSGuy406 @ Apr 4, 2005 -> 08:29 PM) I was watching the 1978 (I think that was the year) game where Bucky Dent hti the homerun to win it for the Yankees, and my dad turns and tells me, "That's what was so much better about the game back then than it is today." And he tells me to look at the pitcher, and, just like Buehrle, it was get the sign, throw it, get the sign, throw it. Nice and quick. The big difference is that many managers call games from the dugout, which slows it down a bit. When you have a battery like AJ and MB, Ozzie could go Jerry Manuel and take a nap. Edited April 5, 2005 by southsider2k5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That funky motion Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 We would have been the team last year,to have the error and lose the game. It was also nice to see a packed house,with only a couple of fights!!! = Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted April 5, 2005 Author Share Posted April 5, 2005 Interesting observations. I think AJ might be the single biggest signing this offseason. It's nice to have a decent catcher back there that can handle this pitching staff. That alone will win ballgames. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSGuy406 Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 One more observation (after watching the replay on Comcast) -- the sound on Comcast is absolutely terrible. They better clean that up ASAP, it was pretty poor... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilJester99 Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 QUOTE(CWSGuy406 @ Apr 4, 2005 -> 08:58 PM) One more observation (after watching the replay on Comcast) -- the sound on Comcast is absolutely terrible. They better clean that up ASAP, it was pretty poor... Thats how their sounds has been the whole time... so low its almost muffled half the time...its terrible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Hudler Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 QUOTE(JimH @ Apr 5, 2005 -> 02:15 AM) I was at the game, in great seats. Westbrook was a stud today, every bit as good as Buehrle. Iguchi and Podesdnik both looked overmatched today but I was not shocked, Westbrook was that good. Buehrle and Shingo were better ... it ended up as a win, and IMO credit is due to Pierzynski, he called a magnificent game. Sox did just enough executing on offense to get it done. Very frankly with the way those two starting pitchers were dealing, I'm surprised anyone scored. It was a pitchers duel, plain and simple. One win in the column, let's focus on Wednesday. Westbrook was very good...... I was surprised to find that he actually threw more strikes than Buehrle. Their pitch count was almost the same as well. Both guys were excellent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonkeyKongerko Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 May 13, 2003, White Sox 1, Baltimore 0. I don't mind winning by more than one since we had all those one-run games last year. It's nice to know we're capable of winning 1-0. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilMonkey Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 QUOTE(Jabroni @ Apr 5, 2005 -> 01:12 AM) Westbrook was dealing. He looked every bit as good as his 3.38 ERA of last season. I have to second that statement. It was only one game, but give credit to Westbrook pitching his butt off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Honda Civic Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 Everyone remarking that Westbrook was dealing... Take a mental picture of his sinker..... OK now recall Jon Garland's best sinker. The two are not even close. I'm a big Jon Garland fan, but don't let anyone tell you how great his stuff is. It just doesn't stack up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sox-r-us Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Apr 5, 2005 -> 02:33 AM) The big difference is that many managers call games from the dugout, which slows it down a bit. When you have a battery like AJ and MB, Ozzie could go Jerry Manuel and take a nap. Did you just have to mention Manuel? After seeing the Illini lose a close one, I will go postal if anyone mentions his name again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonkeyKongerko Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 I did see AJ looking over quite a bit but maybe it was just for possible pitchout signs when Indians were on base. I also only remember AJ and Mark having one or two conferences. It seemed like they were on the same page the whole game. I don't think Cleveland hit any balls hard that had a chance of being fair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.