gettysburg32 Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 Garland 4 IP, 4 H, 0 R, 48 pitches (32 strikes) Getting ahead of most hitters, just as impressive as the first 4 games so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 That's a play that Crede should have made. He overdove it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santo=dorf Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 :headshake Garland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 Garland's inability to strike out a batter is pathetic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confederate_48 Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 Typical Garland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxy Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 wtf just happened here??????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyho7476 Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 How about some strikeouts Jon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 Was I the only one who thought that was a routine flyball off Stewart's bat? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gettysburg32 Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 side note - TB 11, Oakland 1 - 7th inning @ TB Zito - 3.1 IP, 11 R, 8 ER, 2 HRs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 What type of odds can I get that Garland and Crede won't be on the Sox next year? I would say there's a 80 pct chance of neither of them being with the team next year, and I wouldn't be upset about that at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSGuy406 Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 QUOTE(fathom @ Apr 10, 2005 -> 12:27 AM) Was I the only one who thought that was a routine flyball off Stewart's bat? Same here. Good to see Jon settle down. Folks, we knew the streak of great outings was going to end, and Jon is still having a pretty good outing, so long as he can give us another inning or two of shutout ball. Time for the offense to get us one more. Jon isn't throwing many straight fastballs today. I thought he could have got Stewart on a four-seamer to the outside corner. And, is it just me, or is this ump's strikezone awfully small today? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 There's something wrong with that radar gun. No way are these 2 pitchers hitting 109-110. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 Yes, this umpire has the smallest strike zone I've ever seen. It hasn't really hurt us yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSGuy406 Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 Wow -- that pitch hasn't been a strike all day, yet now it's a strike against Konerko. I hate that -- inconsistent strike zones suck. Call it the same all day, I won't b****, but that can't be a strike for Radke, yet not for Garland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 11 in a row retired by Radke. I'm not exactly confident that we're going to pull this game out, especially with Rincon and Nathan lurking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSGuy406 Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 Someone tell our offense to wake up. :banghead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 QUOTE(fathom @ Apr 9, 2005 -> 06:35 PM) 11 in a row retired by Radke. I'm not exactly confident that we're going to pull this game out, especially with Rincon and Nathan lurking. Dude. Chill the hell out. It's tied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSGuy406 Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 Oyyy -- Jon... :headshake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 QUOTE(NUKE_CLEVELAND @ Apr 10, 2005 -> 12:36 AM) Dude. Chill the hell out. It's tied. Nuke, when their pitcher is mowing down our offense, and Garland has been known for his meltdowns, you don't have to be a genius to realize that the Sox chances are not great in a tied game. The Twins have a tremendous bullpen, so if they get a run this inning or the next, we're in a lot of trouble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 We should intentionally walk Ford here. Cuddyer is a definite double play threat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSGuy406 Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 Crede, you f***in' bum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSGuy406 Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 f*** YEAH JON! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 Wow, good pitch by Garland. Not sure what Crede was thinking, Lecroy was very close to the base when he went after him. Lets get a grounder Jon....and he does! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santo=dorf Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 QUOTE(fathom @ Apr 9, 2005 -> 07:40 PM) We should intentionally walk Ford here. Cuddyer is a definite double play threat. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chimpy2121 Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 Thank god for the DP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts