Jump to content

Merit increases...


Steff

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Apr 12, 2005 -> 11:48 AM)
Our company has given us accross the board increases ever since I have been here.  Reviews, attendence, work ethic; none of that matters here.  And now no one cares or works particularly hard because of that.

 

 

Really...? That's weird. I have to have my people's increases in today and I'm wondering what the rest of the world is getting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Apr 12, 2005 -> 11:48 AM)
Our company has given us accross the board increases ever since I have been here.  Reviews, attendence, work ethic; none of that matters here.  And now no one cares or works particularly hard because of that.

 

That's so typical in today's business world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Apr 12, 2005 -> 11:52 AM)
That's typical of the company I work for though... They are really backwards when it comes to productivity.

 

FWIW we have gotten 3% for the last 3 years.

 

 

I have a pool and can distribute up to 6%. Anything I save the company loves of course.. :rolly I don't have any empolyees that I feel deserve the full 6%.. but several are right at 5%. Sounds like that might be too much.. :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(YASNY @ Apr 12, 2005 -> 11:54 AM)
In my opinion, Steff, you are doing things the right way.

 

 

It's a lot of effing work... but it's fair. I have some slackers and I don't think it's fair to just give them a raise if they aren't pulling their weight. When I meet with them they are aware of the pool amount and I give them a detailed explination of why I subtracted points and we discuss it. That way when they get their % they are not surprised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Steff @ Apr 12, 2005 -> 11:56 AM)
It's a lot of effing work... but it's fair. I have some slackers and I don't think it's fair to just give them a raise if they aren't pulling their weight. When I meet with them they are aware of the pool amount and I give them a detailed explination of why I subtracted points and we discuss it. That way when they get their % they are not surprised.

 

 

Sounds to me like you could have a simple formula. Rate them on a scale of 1 to 5, and let that be their percentage.

Edited by YASNY
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(EvilJester99 @ Apr 12, 2005 -> 11:56 AM)
s*** if you're giving out 5% raises your employees will be loving you me thinks. Plus are you hiring?? hehe :bang

 

 

You don't want to work here.. the staff accountants I oversee aren't paid scale. It's sick. Most of them have been here 10+ years and their salary reflects those wages. I'm the highest paid in the financial department that's not an executive and I've only been here 5 years. Not that I'm complaining, but that's messed up for those at the same grade level who have been here lots longer than I.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Steff @ Apr 12, 2005 -> 11:00 AM)
You don't want to work here.. the staff accountants I oversee aren't paid scale. It's sick. Most of them have been here 10+ years and their salary reflects those wages. I'm the highest paid in the financial department that's not an executive and I've only been here 5 years. Not that I'm complaining, but that's messed up for those at the same grade level who have been here lots longer than I.

Yeah that is pretty s***ty that someone who has been there for 10 years is making the same or maybe even less than someone who has been there less time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(YASNY @ Apr 12, 2005 -> 11:58 AM)
Sounds to me like you could have a simple formula.  Rate them on a scale of 1 to 5, and let that be their percentage.

 

 

That's how I do it.. but then I have to take my % formulation and stick it into the scale that the executives want it in. It's so confusing. They don't use a straight %. Some empolyees get weird %'s like a 3.4.. or a 5.2.. it's strange. :bang

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(EvilJester99 @ Apr 12, 2005 -> 12:02 PM)
Yeah that is pretty s***ty that someone who has been there for 10 years is making the same or maybe even less than someone who has been there less time.

 

That is totally wrong. It's all about $$$$. If you are making the company $$$, then they should pay you more $$$. Not becasue you've been there longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Steff @ Apr 12, 2005 -> 12:04 PM)
That's how I do it.. but then I have to take my % formulation and stick it into the scale that the executives want it in. It's so confusing. They don't use a straight %. Some empolyees get weird %'s like a 3.4.. or a 5.2.. it's strange.  :bang

 

Ok .. rate them on a scale of 1 to 10 and divide by 2 for their %

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(EvilJester99 @ Apr 12, 2005 -> 12:02 PM)
Yeah that is pretty s***ty that someone who has been there for 10 years is making the same or maybe even less than someone who has been there less time.

 

Their explination is that I have a degree.. the thing is.. several people under me don't have one.. but know a lot more than me and are more valuable to the company because they know more stuff. I have never been a fan of a piece of paper = more $$. IMO experience should be a larger factor in pay rating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well most empty suits think because you carry a degree you will know more than anyone and that in itself is BS. I would rather have someone who has experience and actually knows their job than someone with a degree and may not know the job as well. I see that all the time here at my job...the more degrees you carry the more they love you but its seems most times the more degrees they have the less they know about the job here...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(YASNY @ Apr 12, 2005 -> 12:05 PM)
That is totally wrong.  It's all about $$$$.  If you are making the company $$$, then they should pay you more $$$.  Not becasue you've been there longer.

 

 

Positions like staff accountants don't make the company $$ though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(EvilJester99 @ Apr 12, 2005 -> 12:09 PM)
Well most empty suits think because you carry a degree you will know more than anyone and that in itself is BS. I would rather have someone who has experience and actually knows their job than someone with a degree and may not know the job as well. I see that all the time here at my job...the more degrees you carry the more they love you but its seems most times the more degrees they have the less they know about the job here...

 

 

 

Definitely. I had to interview a girl a few weeks ago.. ink still wet on the degree... she didn't know one thing about People Soft - which we use a lot... interviewed another woman in her mid 40's who had no degree but could literally write PS queries... they wanted me to hire the one with the degree.. :banghead

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fact is, you have an education that tells people that you set goals and work for them. That's all a college degree is. Fair, or unfair, it's about showing that you have goals and you see them through.

 

I have a master's degree and a CPA, and it don't mean s*** to me. But it sure does open up doors that I would not have otherwise. It blows my mind that the letters CPA behind my name gets me to where I am, but there certainly are a lot of people that have way more knowledge then I do.

 

Merit - my f'ed up company that I just left was at 2%. :fyou old company. Actually it's funny, I was just looking at all that at my present company and they are anywhere between 2.9 and 4.3%, depending on department.

 

You should tie their scores to their percentage. If they do average work, they get the company 3%. If they are above, they get above, according to the rating system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(kapkomet @ Apr 12, 2005 -> 12:13 PM)
You should tie their scores to their percentage.  If they do average work, they get the company 3%.  If they are above, they get above, according to the rating system.

 

 

 

That's how it works out in the end. I just have to detail how I got there which is a pain in the ass. They don't even really look at it.. unless I give out, what they think is, too much.. then they are in my office wanting me to explain.. :lolhitting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...